Arpig
Posts: 9930
Joined: 1/3/2006 From: Increasingly further from reality Status: offline
|
Your problem FE, is that I, and most others on here, comprehend far to well. Despite your turgid and overy convoluted posting style, we can see through it and know you for the lying little shit you are. How about I give you a recap of the lies, falsehoods, misrepresentations and just general bullshittery you have engaged in on this thread alone. quote:
As to your report, one person on another thread said that he found male sexual acts to be disgusting, which naturally (to you) leads to the question of "why is this attitude so predominantly a hetero male attitude?" quote:
Because it suits your purpose to find it thus, as would be taken by such standards of evidence as elicited here. http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3826743 quote:
Except that that's not what she's really saying, as noted by your claim above. http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3827152 quote:
Hetero men are not "conditioned" by nurture to be repulsed by the actual male homosexual activity itself, nature already did that, long time ago, same time as when nature made men and women different. http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3827257 quote:
Again, it's not the thought of two men together, it's having to actually watch the proceedings that are in discussion here. http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3827284 quote:
I made a clear distinction between the natural repulsion of the intimate acts themselves and the "concept" of like genders being attracted to each other at all, sorry if that was missed. http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3827416 quote:
I did indeed make a distinction there, but if we get to what thought means, what would you describe it as other than visualization or other self-sensed imagining of some sort? Are you trying to tell us that the "idea" spoken of exists in its own void, without any mental sensory foundation at all? http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3827477 quote:
Particular model or not, we do not lose everything from the biology that the planet started with, elsewise we have no DNA, no RNA, no bacteria in the ground, nor in our gut. Which is to say we wouldn't be here. Unless you think nature is as stupid as humans and just tosses out the last 200 million year process as soon as a newer layer is added. http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3827506 quote:
In my haste to propose that tires were better that sleds for cars, I stumbled upon a 'model' for concrete tires. If people need a better model to grasp the concept of tires vs. sleds (understandable), then they are available. http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3827515 quote:
That essentially eliminated a model as requirement to explain geology and evolution as a whole. http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3827516 quote:
As to the fellow that said that the idea disgusted him, and then the OP taking that ball and running with it ... (throws hands up) Drama seeks drama, all I can say. http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3827532 quote:
The OP expressed her opinion that all hetero males are as represented by the one example she gave. I stated that a small percentage of lesbians despise men on general principle. quote:
But since you've provided such irrefutable evidence in your mind for veracity of the OP's sentiment, you can then explain to us here why you are a homophobe. http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3827824 quote:
Projection noted. http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3827838 quote:
In any case, different responses speak to different posts, the first being a rhetorical generalization that spoke to another's explicit generalization: quote:
It is interesting that you think that les quatre have more experience with homophobes than everybody else, but I can't say surprising. http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3827917 quote:
Your lies are OK, but mine are not. (even the latter being what would be obvious to thinking people as imperfect paraphrasing) http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3827982 quote:
Its in one of your first responses to mine, which most others here comprehended just fine, whether you did or not, and was pointed out in my following response http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3828027 and originally http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3828029 before you edited it out. quote:
I am sure that most anyone here can see the broadmindedness and lack of generalization or gross oversimplification and dearth of inherent bigotry in those statements, http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3828054 quote:
In other words, you are both too stupid and too lazy to read back in the thread yourself http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3828074 quote:
What is Cheri arguing against, exactly, or is that asking too much? http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3828098 quote:
My response was not an intentional contention, but rather a response to your own specious contention, as proposed in the OP. quote:
This is probably not your fault, but the OP led many posters here to equate the natural hetero male vs. hetero male repulsion of the idea, the witnessing of, the thought of, etc. of male intimacy, which repulsion is in place not by nurture, but nature, as then proposed to be part and parcel of rejection of the idea of two men wanting to be together at all, even intimate when at home. Why any of that would concern the rest of us at all (especially you) is not understandable to me. quote:
Natural male/male repulsion has never, and still does not, equate to male rejection of m/m relationships outright. Society can alter that, no question, the nurture part of it regarding rejection of the concept. quote:
It's up to you as to strength of your argument (if there is one) whether to base it on that one example or not. http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3828165 quote:
Considering the OP, I can can only wish you luck there. http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3828185 quote:
Your focus is on hetero men who are uncomfortable, to say the least, about the idea of intimate contact among males. I think that the ground has been well covered, long before this thread, but dead horses always attract the whip for many. I merely brought attention to the fact that some few lesbians are not merely uncomfortable, but actually are taken quite aback, some fewer even horrified at the idea of heterosexual encounter. http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3828262 The only posts in which you didn't try pulling a fast Eddy move were the following six, of which five are mere insults so don't really apply, though they are baseless insults so they should. http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3827720 http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3828074 http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3828106 http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3828288 http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3828302 So....that gives us a rate of 80% of your posts contain bullshit in one form or another 15% are insults based on your own previous bullshit version of reality and are therefore also basically bullshit. Which leaves us a staggering 5% of you posts have been free of bullshit on this thread. Well done Fast Eddy, you made it to 5%!!!
< Message edited by Arpig -- 8/30/2011 4:14:23 PM >
_____________________________
Big man! Pig Man! Ha Ha...Charade you are! Why do they leave out the letter b on "Garage Sale" signs? CM's #1 All-Time Also-Ran
|