RE: Religious Wrong gets smacked down again (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


tazzygirl -> RE: Religious Wrong gets smacked down again (9/3/2011 6:02:37 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Later abortions are available... from a qualified physician, in a hospital... not in an abortion center. And he/she better be able to show proof that the procedure was medically necessary.

Late term abortions are not available upon demand ...

1.4% are after 20 weeks.
Of those, 0.8% are past 24 weeks. Roughly between 1000 and 1200 a year.


So, you're advocating more laws permitting government Intrusion into people's private medical relation with their doctors?

What ever happened to "Small Government?" Now you want to use MY TAX DOLLARS to monitor what doctors and patients do?

How many more bureaucrats do you plan to hire? How many millions do you plan on wasting?

If a patient and doctor violate your rules, since it's murder, shouldn't the doctor and mother be both put to death?



What are you on about? Those are the laws. Any chart can be pulled for review. At any time a complaint can be made and those charts will be pulled. Since late term abortions are rare, they will be pulled anyways.




tazzygirl -> RE: Religious Wrong gets smacked down again (9/3/2011 6:04:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

Vote the way you want dickhead. I'll vote the way I want. States don't define abortion as murder. That would be unconstitutional. What they're beginning to do however, is define life as beginning at conception.


And in doing so, they hope to eventually overturn RvW.

I have no problem with life beginning at conception.

I also have no problem being pro-choice.


Then you have no problem condoning murder.


Do you support ending life support? People are given that decision to make everyday. This is no different.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Religious Wrong gets smacked down again (9/3/2011 6:56:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

Vote the way you want dickhead. I'll vote the way I want. States don't define abortion as murder. That would be unconstitutional. What they're beginning to do however, is define life as beginning at conception.


And in doing so, they hope to eventually overturn RvW.

I have no problem with life beginning at conception.

I also have no problem being pro-choice.


Then you have no problem condoning murder.


Do you support ending life support? People are given that decision to make everyday. This is no different.


Huge difference. Life support is ended when it is determined that a person no longer has a life ahead of them. An unborn child has a whole lifetime ahead of them. You will fail on every possible argument in favor of abortion once you admit that there is a human life. All you have left is the mothers right to murder. good luck with that.




farglebargle -> RE: Religious Wrong gets smacked down again (9/3/2011 8:54:53 PM)

quote:

You will fail on every possible argument in favor of abortion once you admit that there is a human life.


What's so special about human life? There's billions of them on the planet and more every day.

Shit, we pay people to kill other humans -- with YOUR tax dollars.

Are you saying that the 14 year old girl gang-raped to death by US Troops didn't a whole lifetime ahead of her?

Well, not after the US Troops murdered her family, gang raped her, and murdered her, but you get the point.

If it's murder, then what makes the fetus murdered with private funds more important than the 14 year old girl murdered with your tax dollars?

Is it because the 14 year old wasn't an American?




farglebargle -> RE: Religious Wrong gets smacked down again (9/3/2011 9:00:07 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Later abortions are available... from a qualified physician, in a hospital... not in an abortion center. And he/she better be able to show proof that the procedure was medically necessary.

Late term abortions are not available upon demand ...

1.4% are after 20 weeks.
Of those, 0.8% are past 24 weeks. Roughly between 1000 and 1200 a year.


So, you're advocating more laws permitting government Intrusion into people's private medical relation with their doctors?

What ever happened to "Small Government?" Now you want to use MY TAX DOLLARS to monitor what doctors and patients do?

How many more bureaucrats do you plan to hire? How many millions do you plan on wasting?

If a patient and doctor violate your rules, since it's murder, shouldn't the doctor and mother be both put to death?



What are you on about? Those are the laws. Any chart can be pulled for review. At any time a complaint can be made and those charts will be pulled. Since late term abortions are rare, they will be pulled anyways.


How many people are you planning on hiring to do that? It's a full time government job with benefits and pensions, and I want to know how much of My Tax Dollars you're planning spending to enforcing your Christian-Sharia Law...




tazzygirl -> RE: Religious Wrong gets smacked down again (9/3/2011 9:25:33 PM)

quote:

How many people are you planning on hiring to do that? It's a full time government job with benefits and pensions, and I want to know how much of My Tax Dollars you're planning spending to enforcing your Christian-Sharia Law...


Hospitals do it as a routine part of care. Its called medical case review. Insurance companies perform the same review, especially as late term abortions can be expensive. Teaching hospitals review almost every case as a standard of care.

No new hiring needs to be done.




farglebargle -> RE: Religious Wrong gets smacked down again (9/3/2011 9:27:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

How many people are you planning on hiring to do that? It's a full time government job with benefits and pensions, and I want to know how much of My Tax Dollars you're planning spending to enforcing your Christian-Sharia Law...


Hospitals do it as a routine part of care. Its called medical case review. Insurance companies perform the same review, especially as late term abortions can be expensive. Teaching hospitals review almost every case as a standard of care.

No new hiring needs to be done.



But RIGHT NOW the Hospital isn't reporting it to the Government, right?

So. Who does the Hospital file their reports with going forward?

New Government Employees.




tazzygirl -> RE: Religious Wrong gets smacked down again (9/3/2011 9:27:15 PM)

quote:

Life support is ended when it is determined that a person no longer has a life ahead of them. An unborn child has a whole lifetime ahead of them.


Without the mother, there is no life expectancy... which is why its centered around viability. When a fetus reaches the age of viability, it becomes murder. Simple enough for most people to understand.




LiveByYourNature -> RE: Religious Wrong gets smacked down again (9/3/2011 9:30:59 PM)

So you are both celebrating a judge upholding the doctor's right to make a quick buck by advocating and performing the murder of innocent children AND the right of an organization to help parents make better decisions than to get pregnant through selfish actions and then abort that child in a fit of whimsy?

Hmm .. that's a mixed message!




tazzygirl -> RE: Religious Wrong gets smacked down again (9/3/2011 9:37:50 PM)

quote:

But RIGHT NOW the Hospital isn't reporting it to the Government, right?

So. Who does the Hospital file their reports with going forward?

New Government Employees.


Yes, the hospitals do report cases of gross negligence. Other physicians report them. Medical staff report them. I testified against two Doctors myself after we nurses reported a physician to our risk management manager, who investigated and turned them in to the state.

Where do you get your information?




tazzygirl -> RE: Religious Wrong gets smacked down again (9/3/2011 9:38:54 PM)

quote:

So you are both celebrating a judge upholding the doctor's right to make a quick buck by advocating and performing the murder of innocent children AND the right of an organization to help parents make better decisions than to get pregnant through selfish actions and then abort that child in a fit of whimsy?


Selfish actions? That one you are going to have to elaborate upon.




farglebargle -> RE: Religious Wrong gets smacked down again (9/3/2011 9:39:49 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

But RIGHT NOW the Hospital isn't reporting it to the Government, right?

So. Who does the Hospital file their reports with going forward?

New Government Employees.


Yes, the hospitals do report cases of gross negligence. Other physicians report them. Medical staff report them. I testified against two Doctors myself after we nurses reported a physician to our risk management manager, who investigated and turned them in to the state.

Where do you get your information?


But that's not what they're talking about. They're talking about governmental review of all abortion records, to further stigmatize women.

You can't do that without hiring people to collect the reports.




tazzygirl -> RE: Religious Wrong gets smacked down again (9/3/2011 9:43:23 PM)

They are already required to report those cases to the state.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Religious Wrong gets smacked down again (9/3/2011 10:48:47 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

Life support is ended when it is determined that a person no longer has a life ahead of them. An unborn child has a whole lifetime ahead of them.


Without the mother, there is no life expectancy... which is why its centered around viability. When a fetus reaches the age of viability, it becomes murder. Simple enough for most people to understand.


Not simple enough for most pro-choicers to understand, Im afraid.




farglebargle -> RE: Religious Wrong gets smacked down again (9/3/2011 10:52:33 PM)

If it's murder, then what makes the fetus murdered with private funds more important than the 14 year old girl murdered with your tax dollars?




tazzygirl -> RE: Religious Wrong gets smacked down again (9/3/2011 10:53:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

Life support is ended when it is determined that a person no longer has a life ahead of them. An unborn child has a whole lifetime ahead of them.


Without the mother, there is no life expectancy... which is why its centered around viability. When a fetus reaches the age of viability, it becomes murder. Simple enough for most people to understand.


Not simple enough for most pro-choicers to understand, Im afraid.


Oh its quite simple, willbe. Too simple, and too understandable, for a right winger like yourself to manipulate.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Religious Wrong gets smacked down again (9/3/2011 10:56:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

If it's murder, then what makes the fetus murdered with private funds more important than the 14 year old girl murdered with your tax dollars?

Is it because the 14 year old wasn't an American?



wtf are you ranting about now?




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Religious Wrong gets smacked down again (9/3/2011 10:58:38 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

Life support is ended when it is determined that a person no longer has a life ahead of them. An unborn child has a whole lifetime ahead of them.


Without the mother, there is no life expectancy... which is why its centered around viability. When a fetus reaches the age of viability, it becomes murder. Simple enough for most people to understand.


Not simple enough for most pro-choicers to understand, Im afraid.


Oh its quite simple, willbe. Too simple, and too understandable, for a right winger like yourself to manipulate.


Odd you should say that, since if you know enough about me to make an assessment than you would also know that I fucking agree with your last post, which takes a strikingly different tone than your usual feminist bullshit.




farglebargle -> RE: Religious Wrong gets smacked down again (9/3/2011 10:59:08 PM)

The unanswered question. You agreed with the hypothesis that once it's viable it's murder.

So, again, my point. If it's murder, why aren't you calling for the prosecution of the mother and the doctor for murder?

And if it's murder fetuses with private funds, why is that worse than murdering a 14 year old girl with tax dollars?




tazzygirl -> RE: Religious Wrong gets smacked down again (9/3/2011 11:01:31 PM)

Pro-choice isnt about abortion... its about the woman's right to make that decision for herself. I never want to take that away from any woman. Would I get one myself? Nope. But I will be damned if I will settle back and allow someone in government to decide that issue for all women.




Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
4.699707E-02