allthatjaz -> RE: Squirting, gals have the fear of pee all over themselves? (9/14/2011 8:50:46 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: mysubhasatemper Female ejaculation is believed to originate in the Skene's gland. It is not clear that all women have a Skene's gland, or at least a functional Skene's gland. Women who do not possess a functional Skene's gland are not physically capable of ejaculating, which might explain the variation you are seeing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skene%27s_gland Talk to your Sub. Assuming you understand the anatomy and know what you are doing, she simply may not be capable of squirting. It's not the end of Rome if she can't. Yep, and the skene gland is only small and can only at best produce a couple of ounces of fluid. I recall one set of research where the women 'all squirters' had their bladders drained and catheterized before being stimulating into squirting. Some of the women excreted small amounts of milky-white fluid from the urethra outside of the catheter tube. Others expelled something like 900 ml straight into the catheter bag but how could this be so if their bladders had been drained? They concluded that this large amount of fluid must of come from post draining kidney output. The fluid in the catheter bags was tested and all results were consistent. The concentration was greatly reduced making the fluid clear and odorless. It was lacking creatine and urea (two components normally found in urine). It wasn't strictly urine but an altered form of urine from a chemical process that goes on when a woman's being sexually stimulated. So is a large gush ejaculation fluid or piss? its probably both but the piss is clear and odorless through chemical change during sexual excitement. More and more women are bragging, (I blame it on the porn industry) about how much they squirt. Its no longer about being able to ejaculate, its about how much you can ejaculate! If you can’t produce a tidal wave then you simply aren’t doing it right!! I don’t see a problem with a gush containing diluted urine but it seems that many women do. What I don't understand is, the amount of men and women who adamantly insist there is no urine mixed in with this huge output of ejaculation fluid (is that because they think urine is dirty?) and that all of this fluid has come out of some magic pouch, when every researcher working specifically on this subject will tell you otherwise. One scene gland researcher recently said, even if it were possible for the scene glands to swell to half pint capacity, the pain and discomfort would be unbearable but more importantly, the damage to the urethra would be irreparable. I don't think we should be overly convinced by watching porn. Commercial porn is all smoke and mirrors. There is big money to be made in delivering a fantasy in cinematic form. When it comes to squirting, what most camera girls produce is a steady stream of liquid (urine) that they break up and make gushy, by a patting motion of the hand. Insertions and expert patting can make that pee look like ‘explosions’
|
|
|
|