Banks Took $6B in Reinsurance Kickbacks, Investigators Say (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Lucylastic -> Banks Took $6B in Reinsurance Kickbacks, Investigators Say (9/7/2011 3:57:34 AM)

Enlightening read

http://www.americanbanker.com/issues/176_173/mortgage-reinsurance-respa-kickbacks-hud-investigation-doj-1041928-1.html

Many of the country's largest banks received $6 billion in kickbacks from mortgage insurers over the course of a decade, according to a previously undisclosed investigation by the Inspector General of the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

The allegations, since referred to the Department of Justice, stem from lenders' demand that insurers cut them in on the lucrative business of insuring the mortgages they produced during the housing boom.

In exchange for the their business, companies such as Citigroup Inc, Wells Fargo & Co, SunTrust Banks Inc. and Countrywide allegedly required reinsurance partnerships on generous terms that violated the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, a 1974 law prohibiting abusive home sales practices.

During a two-day presentation in the summer of 2009, HUD's team presented DOJ attorneys with a thick binder of evidence that major banks had engineered a decade-long kickback scheme, people familiar with the investigation say.

Documents from the investigation show that the inspector general's staff concluded that banks and insurance companies had created elaborate financial structures that had the appearance of reinsurance but failed to transfer significant amounts of risk to their bank underwriters.

Some of the deals were designed to return a 400% profit on a bank's investment during good years and remain profitable even in the event of a real estate collapse.

Making matters worse, banks allegedly forced unknowing consumers to buy more insurance than they needed and failed to properly disclose the reinsurance agreements, another RESPA violation.




pahunkboy -> RE: Banks Took $6B in Reinsurance Kickbacks, Investigators Say (9/7/2011 5:16:26 AM)

LOL




samboct -> RE: Banks Took $6B in Reinsurance Kickbacks, Investigators Say (9/7/2011 5:32:30 AM)

More people should have rooms reserved in hotels with bars on the windows....and big roommates named Bubba.

Thanks for posting the article Lucy.

Sam




EternalHoH -> RE: Banks Took $6B in Reinsurance Kickbacks, Investigators Say (9/7/2011 5:34:42 AM)

The only reason Madoff is in jail today is because his con was too damn small.




FirstQuaker -> RE: Banks Took $6B in Reinsurance Kickbacks, Investigators Say (9/7/2011 7:38:58 AM)

In this case (at least south of the border) they might have been hoisted by their own asses, since much of the robosigning scandals have lead to titles being questionable and the title insurers being the ones left holding the bag and being responsible for paying the damages.

quote:

Counties across the United States are discovering that illegal or questionable mortgage paperwork is far more widespread than thought, tainting the deeds of tens of thousands of homes dating to the late 1990s.
The suspect documents could create legal trouble for homeowners for years.Already, mortgage papers are being invalidated by courts, insurers are hesitant to write policies, and judges are blocking banks from foreclosing on homes. The findings by various county registers of deeds have also hindered a settlement between the 50 state attorneys general who are investigating big banks and other mortgage lenders over controversial mortgage practices.
The problem of shoddy mortgage paperwork, which comprises several shortcuts known collectively as “robo-signing,” led the nation’s largest banks, including Bank of America Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Wells Fargo & Co., and other lenders to temporarily halt foreclosures nationwide last fall.
At the time, “robo-signing” was thought to be contained to the affidavits that banks file when a mortgage is issued and somebody buys a house. The documents are used to prove they have the right foreclosure if the homeowner isn’t making mortgage payments. Companies that process mortgages said they were so overwhelmed with paperwork that they cut corners.
But now, as county officials review years’ worth of mortgage paperwork, in some cases combing through one page at a time, they are finding suspect signatures Ñ either signed with the same name by dozens of different people, improperly notarized or signed without a review of the facts in the paperwork Ñ on all sorts of mortgage documents, dating as far back as 1998, The Associated Press has found.
-
Robo-signed mortgage docs date back to late 1990s

And naturally the insurance companies will be looking to sue those banks and mortgage companies responsible to recoup their losses . . .

I would stay tuned and see just where this leads up, but I suspect the banks will not be keeping much if any of that 6 billion, if indeed they don't end up spending money on rectifying this..





Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125