RE: Yet another lying Republican piece of shit.... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Lucylastic -> RE: Yet another lying Republican piece of shit.... (9/12/2011 9:31:23 PM)

http://www.youtube.com/user/nikkihaley#p/a/u/1/bBOhqiP9GUE
at 7.30..
Down on River Site, they were hiring a few hundred people, and when we sat down and talked to them -- this was back before the campaign -- when we sat down and talked to them, they said of everybody they interviewed, half of them failed a drug test, and of the half that was left, of that 50 percent, the other half couldn't read and write properly,"
no she isnt lying is she....




tazzygirl -> RE: Yet another lying Republican piece of shit.... (9/12/2011 9:34:26 PM)

“Down on River Site, they were hiring a few hundred people, and when we sat down and talked to them — this was back before the campaign — when we sat down and talked to them, they said of everybody they interviewed, half of them failed a drug test, and of the half that was left, of that 50 percent, the other half couldn’t read and write properly,” Haley said.

“That’s what we have in South Carolina,” she continued. “We don’t have an unemployment problem. We have an education and poverty problem.”

It may be an unemployment problem after all. Jim Giusti, a spokesman for the Department of Energy, which owns the River Site, told HuffPost he had no idea what Haley was talking about with regard to applicants flunking a drug test.

“Half the people who applied for a job last year or year 2009 did not fail the drug test,” Giusti said. “At the peak of hiring under the Recovery Act we had less than 1 percent of those hired test positive.

The River Site doesn’t even test applicants. “We only test them when they have been accepted,” Giusti said.

http://scjusticewatch.org/2011/09/12/cold-busted-srs-disputes-haleys-drug-testing-claim/




Raiikun -> RE: Yet another lying Republican piece of shit.... (9/12/2011 9:36:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

My standards are 18 USC 1001.


Which states "knowingly and willfully."

It doesn't change the standard from which I've already stated.




Lucylastic -> RE: Yet another lying Republican piece of shit.... (9/12/2011 9:36:15 PM)

grins at tazzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzy, three nope four different web sources and two video sources
I bet he still doesnt believe its true




Raiikun -> RE: Yet another lying Republican piece of shit.... (9/12/2011 9:37:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

http://www.youtube.com/user/nikkihaley#p/a/u/1/bBOhqiP9GUE
at 7.30..
Down on River Site, they were hiring a few hundred people, and when we sat down and talked to them -- this was back before the campaign -- when we sat down and talked to them, they saidof everybody they interviewed, half of them failed a drug test, and of the half that was left, of that 50 percent, the other half couldn't read and write properly,"



Fun with bolding! =)




tazzygirl -> RE: Yet another lying Republican piece of shit.... (9/12/2011 9:39:04 PM)

Her claim is she spoke to the people at the River Site... and they told her that. According to the River Site, they have no clue what she is talking about.

Care to spin that one?




Raiikun -> RE: Yet another lying Republican piece of shit.... (9/12/2011 9:39:36 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

grins at tazzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzy, three nope four different web sources and two video sources



I've seen the same sources and watched the same videos, you're just missing the part I am trying to point out.

quote:


I bet he still doesnt believe its true


Strawman, I've stated no belief either way.




Raiikun -> RE: Yet another lying Republican piece of shit.... (9/12/2011 9:41:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Her claim is she spoke to the people at the River Site... and Jim Giusti told her that. According to Jim Giusti at River Site, Jim Giusti has no clue what she is talking about.

Care to spin that one?


Fixed for accuracy. She didn't state who at River Site she spoke to. Maybe it wasn't Jim?




Lucylastic -> RE: Yet another lying Republican piece of shit.... (9/12/2011 9:45:24 PM)

sorry Im english, what she said in plain english, the way she said it??
six resources..and still you have no proof of anything to back up your assertion
not strawman at all
just an opinion on your lack of refuting ability




tazzygirl -> RE: Yet another lying Republican piece of shit.... (9/12/2011 9:45:41 PM)

LOL

I assure you Jim would have found out who told her that long before making a statement to the press a four days later. She has yet to comment on Jim's statement.

Look someone is lying... the only one with any motive to lie is Haley herself, someone who has been wanting drug testing since day one in office, someone who is in charge of a state with unemployment thats only better than California and Nevada.

I own up when Obama is wrong.

I really dont understand the rose colored glasses republicans wear all the time.




Raiikun -> RE: Yet another lying Republican piece of shit.... (9/12/2011 9:50:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


not strawman at all


A strawman is when you're attacking an argument someone didn't make. Which you did when you said that I didn't believe it.

I'd like to mention not once have I said that I didn't believe it, and even acknowledged it as a real possiblity that she did lie.

I never claimed she didn't lie, at all. My original "assertion" was to ask if anyone had more details, because that statement wasn't enough *on it's own* to call someone "a lying sack of shit."

Therefore, any statement that "I don't believe it's true" is a strawman by definition.




Raiikun -> RE: Yet another lying Republican piece of shit.... (9/12/2011 9:53:49 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Look someone is lying... the only one with any motive to lie is Haley herself, someone who has been wanting drug testing since day one in office, someone who is in charge of a state with unemployment thats only better than California and Nevada.



See, now that right there I agree with, circumstancially she'd have good reason to lie about it, so I wouldn't be surprised in the *slightest* if she did. I wouldn't be ready to call anyone a "lying sack of shit" based on that info though.

quote:

I really dont understand the rose colored glasses republicans wear all the time.


I don't understand the rose colored glasses worn by either party...one of the reasons why I'm neither.




tazzygirl -> RE: Yet another lying Republican piece of shit.... (9/12/2011 9:57:02 PM)

And, see, I would. Ducks and all that.




Lucylastic -> RE: Yet another lying Republican piece of shit.... (9/12/2011 9:57:44 PM)

nope wrong... I can share an opinion with someone about what I think you will say..thats NOT a strawman. I didnt aim it at you..
Try again
HOw about you find something to PROVE your assertion of how it went..
Cmon... you can do it cant you?




Raiikun -> RE: Yet another lying Republican piece of shit.... (9/12/2011 9:58:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

HOw about you find something to PROVE your assertion of how it went..
Cmon... you can do it cant you?


How about you tell me what my assertion is of how it went?

Oh wait, I didn't make one. Hence...strawman. =)




Lucylastic -> RE: Yet another lying Republican piece of shit.... (9/12/2011 10:10:10 PM)

oooooh arentyou cute
NOT
you said my strawman was "I bet he still doesnt believe its true"
as you got that part wrong, theres no strawman, but now you want to jump to pretending you can change the goalposts.
NOPE
not tonite
you said maybe and could way to many times,to be intellectually honest and then wriggle out of it.. come up with something that says she didnt lie and was mistaken and then I will talk to you again
I am not holding my breath




Raiikun -> RE: Yet another lying Republican piece of shit.... (9/12/2011 10:11:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

you said my strawman was "I bet he still doesnt believe its true"
as you got that part wrong, theres no strawman, but now you want to jump to pretending you can change the goalposts.


Oh that part is still a strawman, as it was stating a positive assertion on my belief in the present tense that didn't exist.

quote:

come up with something that says she didnt lie


I never claimed she didn't lie. I'm not sure why you're arguing as though I did.




Lucylastic -> RE: Yet another lying Republican piece of shit.... (9/12/2011 10:12:01 PM)

wronggggggggggggggggggg




Raiikun -> RE: Yet another lying Republican piece of shit.... (9/12/2011 10:16:49 PM)

What about it is wrong?

You stated that I didn't believe it's true, and are arguing on that basis.

So, unless you can prove I made that assertion that I don't believe it's true, it's a strawman.

(Edit for clarity)




farglebargle -> RE: Yet another lying Republican piece of shit.... (9/13/2011 5:01:27 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun


quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

My standards are 18 USC 1001.


Which states "knowingly and willfully."

It doesn't change the standard from which I've already stated.


Yes. She didn't fact-check, and therefore had no reason to believe her claim was true.

Then, with full knowledge of her negligence, she knowingly and willfully made this material misrepresentation.




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875