DomYngBlk
Posts: 3316
Joined: 3/27/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY quote:
ORIGINAL: tolovetolaugh quote:
ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk If only. Yet, he will win in a landslide cause the Republican party can't get out of their own way... Agreed, they need to bring McCain back with a non crazy VP candidate. As it is, I don't think Obama needs to worry about reelection with what his opposition is comprised of, which takes away his proper motivation to follow good advice and fix things. I can't understand why every single one of the republican candidates are ape shit crazy. They have rational politicians... I know they do! I hate to disagree with you and DYB, but I do, on a couple of points. First, while we are still a little more than a year away from the election, unless there is some major (really major) change in the world of politics, the odds against Obama getting re-elected are about 90% or so. Second, the Republican candidates aren't "ape shit crazy". You just happen to disagree with some of them (or all of them) on a basic philosophy of life, and have bought into the memes grown and sheltered by their philosophical opponents over the decades, to the point that any disagreement with "conventional wisdom" is seen as "ape shit crazy" instead of based on a differing philosophy. In other words, if you aren't careful and thoughtful, you become a prisoner of others' framing, not of your own powers of discernment. Often, what political and philosophical opponents do is to isolate a phrase, a sentence, an interview and then use straw-manning, isolation and prior assumptions and form it into a slanted analysis in order to isolate and destroy basic trust and understanding that people are holistic individuals, not simply ideological constructs. I don't think Obama is "dumb" simply because he said that there are 57 states. Nor do I think he is "intelligent" simply because he has presented some good speeches (or takes credit for taking out bin Laden). Taken as an individual, I believe that he believes what he says, and that he really does wish the best for the US and its citizens. I just think that he is blind to the fact that his personal construct of reality hasn't seemed to mesh real well with what is actually happening in the world, and is either unable or unwilling to change some of his key assumptions. Same with some of the Republican candidates. However several of them have shown that they are willing to change their assumptions when presented with facts that do not conform to reality. Whether you wish to call this "flip flops" or "willing to reconsider" will depend on your own positions and construct, and whether or not you believe that any of them have a core of beliefs that is based on some unalterable principles. Or if they have no core beliefs and are simply pandering. Firm Which of the "others" are willing to reconsider?
|