Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

James Carville on Obama


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> James Carville on Obama Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
James Carville on Obama - 9/16/2011 7:34:34 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
James Carville had some very interesting comments on CNN about Obama.

Here is the link to the entire talk.  It also has a video.

The first few paragraphs:

People often ask me what advice I would give the White House about various things. Today I was mulling over election results from New York and Nevada while thinking about that very question. What should the White House do now? One word came to mind: Panic.

We are far past sending out talking points. Do not attempt to dumb it down. We cannot stand any more explanations. Have you talked to any Democratic senators lately? I have. It's pretty damn clear they are not happy campers.

This is what I would say to President Barack Obama: The time has come to demand a plan of action that requires a complete change from the direction you are headed.

He then goes on to give specific actions he believes that Obama should take. 

All of which I believe are now too late, too little.

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: James Carville on Obama - 9/16/2011 7:40:27 AM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
Bill Clinton was elected to his second term because he listened to James Carville. He knew he had to move to the middle and he did so. Obama will listen to no one, and will not be re elected because of it.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: James Carville on Obama - 9/16/2011 7:56:06 AM   
DomYngBlk


Posts: 3316
Joined: 3/27/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

James Carville had some very interesting comments on CNN about Obama.

Here is the link to the entire talk.  It also has a video.

The first few paragraphs:


People often ask me what advice I would give the White House about various things. Today I was mulling over election results from New York and Nevada while thinking about that very question. What should the White House do now? One word came to mind: Panic.

We are far past sending out talking points. Do not attempt to dumb it down. We cannot stand any more explanations. Have you talked to any Democratic senators lately? I have. It's pretty damn clear they are not happy campers.

This is what I would say to President Barack Obama: The time has come to demand a plan of action that requires a complete change from the direction you are headed.


He then goes on to give specific actions he believes that Obama should take. 

All of which I believe are now too late, too little.

Firm



If only. Yet, he will win in a landslide cause the Republican party can't get out of their own way...

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: James Carville on Obama - 9/16/2011 8:04:38 AM   
tolovetolaugh


Posts: 648
Joined: 4/30/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

If only. Yet, he will win in a landslide cause the Republican party can't get out of their own way...


Agreed, they need to bring McCain back with a non crazy VP candidate.
As it is, I don't think Obama needs to worry about reelection with what his opposition is comprised of, which takes away his proper motivation to follow good advice and fix things.
I can't understand why every single one of the republican candidates are ape shit crazy. They have rational politicians... I know they do!


_____________________________


That which yields, is not always weak. —
Jacqueline Carey (Kushiel's Dart)

I wrote a porn!
http://www.collarchat.com/m_3840531

(in reply to DomYngBlk)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: James Carville on Obama - 9/16/2011 9:41:44 AM   
MileHighM


Posts: 400
Joined: 10/8/2009
Status: offline
McCain?!?!?!!? That guy looks worse than Cheney now.

It ain't just and R problem. The parties are so controlled by their own partisan hackery, only a ideologue can squeek through the primary. Until one party opens up their primaries to drown out the kooks....We are doomed

(in reply to tolovetolaugh)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: James Carville on Obama - 9/16/2011 9:49:50 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tolovetolaugh

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

If only. Yet, he will win in a landslide cause the Republican party can't get out of their own way...


Agreed, they need to bring McCain back with a non crazy VP candidate.
As it is, I don't think Obama needs to worry about reelection with what his opposition is comprised of, which takes away his proper motivation to follow good advice and fix things.
I can't understand why every single one of the republican candidates are ape shit crazy. They have rational politicians... I know they do!

I hate to disagree with you and DYB, but I do, on a couple of points.

First, while we are still a little more than a year away from the election, unless there is some major (really major) change in the world of politics, the odds against Obama getting re-elected are about 90% or so.

Second, the Republican candidates aren't "ape shit crazy".  You just happen to disagree with some of them (or all of them) on a basic philosophy of life, and have bought into the memes grown and sheltered by their philosophical opponents over the decades, to the point that any disagreement with "conventional wisdom" is seen as "ape shit crazy" instead of based on a differing philosophy.

In other words, if you aren't careful and thoughtful, you become a prisoner of others' framing, not of your own powers of discernment.

Often, what political and philosophical opponents do is to isolate a phrase, a sentence, an interview and then use straw-manning, isolation and prior assumptions and form it into a slanted analysis in order to isolate and destroy basic trust and understanding that people are holistic individuals, not simply ideological constructs.

I don't think Obama is "dumb" simply because he said that there are 57 states.  Nor do I think he is "intelligent" simply because he has presented some good speeches (or takes credit for taking out bin Laden).  Taken as an individual, I believe that he believes what he says, and that he really does wish the best for the US and its citizens. 

I just think that he is blind to the fact that his personal construct of reality hasn't seemed to mesh real well with what is actually happening in the world, and is either unable or unwilling to change some of his key assumptions.

Same with some of the Republican candidates.  However several of them have shown that they are willing to change their assumptions when presented with facts that do not conform to reality.  Whether you wish to call this "flip flops" or "willing to reconsider" will depend on your own positions and construct, and whether or not you believe that any of them have a core of beliefs that is based on some unalterable principles.  Or if they have no core beliefs and are simply pandering.

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to tolovetolaugh)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: James Carville on Obama - 9/16/2011 9:50:47 AM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
Yeah lovetolaugh ,they do have rational politicians...the problem is that in order to get through their nomination proccess rationality has to go out the window.The party has been hijacked by their fringe,resulting in nominating completely unelectable candidates.Look at the lineup for their most recent debate...the only halfway sensible man on that platform was Huntsman,and what are his chances of coming out of primary season with the nomination.....zip,zero,nada.The rush to the far right in order to gain the nomination virtually guarantees a loss in the general.


_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to MileHighM)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: James Carville on Obama - 9/16/2011 9:51:14 AM   
DomYngBlk


Posts: 3316
Joined: 3/27/2006
Status: offline
Gotta be kidding. Obama looks like fukin einstein compared to what the R's are doing. Romney has yet to fully realize he is in the wrong party. Hunstman has dumbed himself down to bachmann and perry. grandpa......is worried about perry raising his taxes and if his check from halliburton is coming......cain and gingrich? stantorum? lol........come on be serious.

(in reply to MileHighM)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: James Carville on Obama - 9/16/2011 9:54:28 AM   
lovmuffin


Posts: 3759
Joined: 9/28/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tolovetolaugh

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

If only. Yet, he will win in a landslide cause the Republican party can't get out of their own way...


Agreed, they need to bring McCain back with a non crazy VP candidate.
As it is, I don't think Obama needs to worry about reelection with what his opposition is comprised of, which takes away his proper motivation to follow good advice and fix things.
I can't understand why every single one of the republican candidates are ape shit crazy. They have rational politicians... I know they do!



Disagree with both of you. Obama winning in a landslide is wishful thinking.  I'm not saying things couldn't somehow change but as of now, politically, he's in it up to his neck.  Any one of those guys, even Bachman or Paul could beat him.

McCain lost because there wasn't much enthusiasm from conservatives and he ran a crappy campaign.  If anything Palin was more help than a detriment. With a person who can articulate conservatism well (Gingrich), democrats are toast.

< Message edited by lovmuffin -- 9/16/2011 9:55:14 AM >


_____________________________

"Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world." Unknown

"Long hair, short hair—what's the difference once the head's blowed off." - Farmer Yassir

(in reply to tolovetolaugh)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: James Carville on Obama - 9/16/2011 9:55:13 AM   
DomYngBlk


Posts: 3316
Joined: 3/27/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: tolovetolaugh

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

If only. Yet, he will win in a landslide cause the Republican party can't get out of their own way...


Agreed, they need to bring McCain back with a non crazy VP candidate.
As it is, I don't think Obama needs to worry about reelection with what his opposition is comprised of, which takes away his proper motivation to follow good advice and fix things.
I can't understand why every single one of the republican candidates are ape shit crazy. They have rational politicians... I know they do!

I hate to disagree with you and DYB, but I do, on a couple of points.

First, while we are still a little more than a year away from the election, unless there is some major (really major) change in the world of politics, the odds against Obama getting re-elected are about 90% or so.

Second, the Republican candidates aren't "ape shit crazy".  You just happen to disagree with some of them (or all of them) on a basic philosophy of life, and have bought into the memes grown and sheltered by their philosophical opponents over the decades, to the point that any disagreement with "conventional wisdom" is seen as "ape shit crazy" instead of based on a differing philosophy.

In other words, if you aren't careful and thoughtful, you become a prisoner of others' framing, not of your own powers of discernment.

Often, what political and philosophical opponents do is to isolate a phrase, a sentence, an interview and then use straw-manning, isolation and prior assumptions and form it into a slanted analysis in order to isolate and destroy basic trust and understanding that people are holistic individuals, not simply ideological constructs.

I don't think Obama is "dumb" simply because he said that there are 57 states.  Nor do I think he is "intelligent" simply because he has presented some good speeches (or takes credit for taking out bin Laden).  Taken as an individual, I believe that he believes what he says, and that he really does wish the best for the US and its citizens. 

I just think that he is blind to the fact that his personal construct of reality hasn't seemed to mesh real well with what is actually happening in the world, and is either unable or unwilling to change some of his key assumptions.

Same with some of the Republican candidates.  However several of them have shown that they are willing to change their assumptions when presented with facts that do not conform to reality.  Whether you wish to call this "flip flops" or "willing to reconsider" will depend on your own positions and construct, and whether or not you believe that any of them have a core of beliefs that is based on some unalterable principles.  Or if they have no core beliefs and are simply pandering.

Firm



Which of the "others" are willing to reconsider?

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: James Carville on Obama - 9/16/2011 9:55:31 AM   
SternSkipper


Posts: 7546
Joined: 3/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

McCain?!?!?!!? That guy looks worse than Cheney now.


Lon or Dick?


_____________________________

Looking forward to The Dead Singing The National Anthem At The World Series.




Tinfoilers Swallow


(in reply to MileHighM)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: James Carville on Obama - 9/16/2011 10:00:25 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

Which of the "others" are willing to reconsider?

I'd say all of them, to one extent of another.

I think Bachmann and Paul are in the group "least likely to ..."

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to DomYngBlk)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: James Carville on Obama - 9/16/2011 10:01:56 AM   
DomYngBlk


Posts: 3316
Joined: 3/27/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: tolovetolaugh

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

If only. Yet, he will win in a landslide cause the Republican party can't get out of their own way...


Agreed, they need to bring McCain back with a non crazy VP candidate.
As it is, I don't think Obama needs to worry about reelection with what his opposition is comprised of, which takes away his proper motivation to follow good advice and fix things.
I can't understand why every single one of the republican candidates are ape shit crazy. They have rational politicians... I know they do!



Disagree with both of you. Obama winning in a landslide is wishful thinking.  I'm not saying things couldn't somehow change but as of now, politically, he's in it up to his neck.  Any one of those guys, even Bachman or Paul could beat him.

McCain lost because there wasn't much enthusiasm from conservatives and he ran a crappy campaign.  If anything Palin was more help than a detriment. With a person who can articulate conservatism well (Gingrich), democrats are toast.


Will need to give me another one. People see gingrich as a man that is mean and dumped his wife in the hospital while she was with cancer. No way that is going to win. Plus the tone of his voice is too high....

(in reply to lovmuffin)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: James Carville on Obama - 9/16/2011 10:07:35 AM   
DomYngBlk


Posts: 3316
Joined: 3/27/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

Which of the "others" are willing to reconsider?

I'd say all of them, to one extent of another.

I think Bachmann and Paul are in the group "least likely to ..."

Firm



Agree to disagree....rick santorum? Newt? ......I know what they are going to say, before they say it and I don't even listen to them

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: James Carville on Obama - 9/16/2011 10:08:53 AM   
lovmuffin


Posts: 3759
Joined: 9/28/2007
Status: offline
OOPs

< Message edited by lovmuffin -- 9/16/2011 10:11:39 AM >


_____________________________

"Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world." Unknown

"Long hair, short hair—what's the difference once the head's blowed off." - Farmer Yassir

(in reply to DomYngBlk)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: James Carville on Obama - 9/16/2011 10:09:54 AM   
lovmuffin


Posts: 3759
Joined: 9/28/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: tolovetolaugh

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

If only. Yet, he will win in a landslide cause the Republican party can't get out of their own way...


Agreed, they need to bring McCain back with a non crazy VP candidate.
As it is, I don't think Obama needs to worry about reelection with what his opposition is comprised of, which takes away his proper motivation to follow good advice and fix things.
I can't understand why every single one of the republican candidates are ape shit crazy. They have rational politicians... I know they do!



Disagree with both of you. Obama winning in a landslide is wishful thinking.  I'm not saying things couldn't somehow change but as of now, politically, he's in it up to his neck.  Any one of those guys, even Bachman or Paul could beat him.

McCain lost because there wasn't much enthusiasm from conservatives and he ran a crappy campaign.  If anything Palin was more help than a detriment. With a person who can articulate conservatism well (Gingrich), democrats are toast.


Will need to give me another one. People see gingrich as a man that is mean and dumped his wife in the hospital while she was with cancer. No way that is going to win. Plus the tone of his voice is too high....







   Other than "no way he's going to win", all that may be true but this guy has been saying some pretty profound stuff over the years. I was bitterly disappointed that he didn't jump in the last time.  He's a walking brain on steroids.  I would suggest he can overcome the baggage.


< Message edited by lovmuffin -- 9/16/2011 10:10:39 AM >


_____________________________

"Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world." Unknown

"Long hair, short hair—what's the difference once the head's blowed off." - Farmer Yassir

(in reply to lovmuffin)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: James Carville on Obama - 9/16/2011 10:19:31 AM   
DomYngBlk


Posts: 3316
Joined: 3/27/2006
Status: offline
Nothing I can do about his baggage. Can't see women, even republican women voting for him for dropping it on his wife while she was sick. If that is his style. what else is he able to do. Actually would be great to have him win the nomination. Would give Democrats a chance to put a stake in the heart of the Right Wing cause we both know he can't shut up

(in reply to lovmuffin)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: James Carville on Obama - 9/16/2011 10:24:16 AM   
SternSkipper


Posts: 7546
Joined: 3/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

James Carville had some very interesting comments on CNN about Obama.


Hell yeah ... Mr. Leghorn sure did... tell me something on the QT... given this passage below:

"No -- fire a lot of people. This may be news to you but this is not going well. For precedent, see Russian Army 64th division at Stalingrad. There were enough deaths at Stalingrad to make the entire tea party collectively orgasm."

You guys aren't really spanking it to pictures of Stalingrad, are ya?


_____________________________

Looking forward to The Dead Singing The National Anthem At The World Series.




Tinfoilers Swallow


(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: James Carville on Obama - 9/16/2011 10:26:29 AM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
Minorities came out in huge numbers to help elect Obama. Since he has done nothing to help them, I wonder just how many will come out to give him a second term. I'm guessing not so many.

(in reply to DomYngBlk)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: James Carville on Obama - 9/16/2011 10:38:13 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

James Carville had some very interesting comments on CNN about Obama.

Here is the link to the entire talk.  It also has a video.

The first few paragraphs:

People often ask me what advice I would give the White House about various things. Today I was mulling over election results from New York and Nevada while thinking about that very question. What should the White House do now? One word came to mind: Panic.

We are far past sending out talking points. Do not attempt to dumb it down. We cannot stand any more explanations. Have you talked to any Democratic senators lately? I have. It's pretty damn clear they are not happy campers.

This is what I would say to President Barack Obama: The time has come to demand a plan of action that requires a complete change from the direction you are headed.

He then goes on to give specific actions he believes that Obama should take. 

All of which I believe are now too late, too little.

Firm



Cherry picking quotes again Firm?

You know Carville is a liberal, and you also know that he was stating that Obama was conceding too much to the Republicans.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> James Carville on Obama Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109