RE: Pro vs Relationship...

RE: Pro vs Relationship... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

GreedyTop -> RE: Pro vs Relationship... (9/20/2011 8:10:37 AM)
because she repeatedly claims they ARE hers, Roch...

PeonForHer -> RE: Pro vs Relationship... (9/20/2011 8:41:31 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Rochsub2009 Lots of people use pictures that aren't their own. You don't actually believe that some of the people on here are cartoons, do you? [;)]x Shame if not, though. The OP's avatar has a fine turnout on the upper balcony.

CeriseNin -> RE: Pro vs Relationship... (9/20/2011 8:47:03 AM)
If she poses in the same background, shoves a spoon between her boobs and snaps a pic, we'll know it's really her. A big spoon. Kelli. You're gonna need it.

PeonForHer -> RE: Pro vs Relationship... (9/20/2011 8:47:18 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CBTinDALLAS Male subs/slaves... Would you rather have immediate gratification by going with a Pro Domme, or stay on the various websites waiting for THE ONE? What is the incentive for that you bring to the table for someone to consider you as a potential mate? Ok, to answer seriously: I'm somewhat like Rochsub. My turn-on is power exchange. I can't turn up to see a woman for two hours, switch on that feeling, then switch it off afterwards. I don't get turned on by being whipped, flogged, or restricted in any way, without that feeling of power exchange in place. It takes a bit of heat and a bit of chemistry, over an extended period of time. And it takes two personalities to click.

PeonForHer -> RE: Pro vs Relationship... (9/20/2011 8:48:46 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CeriseNin If she poses in the same background, shoves a spoon between her boobs and snaps a pic, we'll know it's really her. A big spoon. Kelli. You're gonna need it. Er . . . that's too much into woman-speak for me to have a clue what you're talking about. Sorry . . . .

CeriseNin -> RE: Pro vs Relationship... (9/20/2011 8:53:46 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer quote: ORIGINAL: CeriseNin If she poses in the same background, shoves a spoon between her boobs and snaps a pic, we'll know it's really her. A big spoon. Kelli. You're gonna need it. Er . . . that's too much into woman-speak for me to have a clue what you're talking about. Sorry . . . . It was pretty clear, I thought, but I have jet-lag. So... She claims the pic is her. You posted: Shame if not, though. The OP has a fine turnout on the upper balcony. If she poses the same way, in the same background with a spoon between her upper balcony, it's proof the pic is her. The boobs on the pic are HUGE, hence the big spoon. Now, since I have jet-lag, which gives me a case of the stupid, it's possible I completely misunderstood your post.

Killerangel -> RE: Pro vs Relationship... (9/20/2011 8:59:06 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Rochsub2009 quote: ORIGINAL: Killerangel OP, I would also like to know why you are using pictures that don't appear to be yours according to the tineye search. Unless you are claiming ownership of them? Lots of people use pictures that aren't their own. You don't actually believe that some of the people on here are cartoons, do you? [;)] I'm not sure what the big deal is with Kellie's pictures. Even if it's not her, so what? If someone actually decides to meet her, they'll quickly realize that the pictures weren't her, or weren't recent. So why does anyone else cares? On this thread the OP has seemed to claim ownership of the pictures she is using which is fraud if they do not in fact belong to her. How many times do people get ticked off when their personal pictures are stolen and used elsewhere? Plus, the OP is being rude to another over the pictures that poster is using- which happen to be attractive ones and they are also of that poster. Generally I don't have any issues about people using whatever pics they want if they are public property or belong to the user, and I'm not disingenuous to think that people here look like flowers or animals or whatever. The TOS states if you claim a picture is yourself and use it, then it better belong to you. I don't appreciate someone falsely representing themselves in order to make a buck, get attention, or to poke fun at others.

PeonForHer -> RE: Pro vs Relationship... (9/20/2011 9:17:58 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CeriseNin It was pretty clear, I thought, but I have jet-lag. Ah - OK, as you were. I thought I was reading about some fascinating way of testing for various characteristics of boobs that was entirely new to me.

Lockit -> RE: Pro vs Relationship... (9/20/2011 12:11:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lockit quote: ORIGINAL: CBTinDALLAS ]I have many relationships in the D/s community. Before you judge my RECENT picture, maybe you should look at yours-if you can even see the old black and white, faded, net covered pic. So you are saying you aren't that other person? You know me... I link my proof. Care to go there, I have a bit of spare time today. So this is a recent picture of you. I did say I had a bit of spare time yesterday, today, not so much, but I took the time to do as promised. I decided to do a little search based on something I saw when I first got to CM a number of years ago. Something about what I saw back then reminded me of something I had been seeing in more recent years. So I took a little walk on the wild side and did a search of female dominants in Dallas, from way back. I actually found more than I thought I would and whoa... I won't record everything I found here as that would take a bit longer than I have today and would be too long, but I think I can highlight enough to prove that you are at least questionable in honesty and with your pictures. Your posting style, word useage and interests give you away. I mean, everyone uses words and everyone may have some similarity in interest and posting sytle, but this much? I think not. I went with those dominants that said the same things, used the same phrases in discribing themselves and in posting style. If you just read the profiles, you can see the similarities. Same location, same pro status, wanting the same professional men with similar discriptions... etc. Then there are the posts here on the forums. That kind of sealed the deal for me. You have a unique sytle of writing. From the style of your nicknames... it was much easier to find you. DallasDominatrix and GoddessinDallas were very interesting, same phrases, same location and pictures! Not of boobies from some young hot body and I would think very real. DallasDominatrix didn't post much, but GoddessinDallas did. Same posting style. These two profiles had some of the same phrases but what was most interesting was the journal post on each being the exact copy found on each profile. Now... the connection between those two profiles with more current profiles. DommeKeliDallas has two introductions and is compassionate just as CBTinDallas is. Seeking the same types of men, same posting style on the boards and whoa those titties! The topics you post about as Keli are similar to the topics you posted about as the Goddess. In one intro as Keli you say you will do what other domina's won't do. In postings by Keli you say there are things you will not do and dislike. Like doing anal sex with a man and you make many comments on those do me submissives that want to do oral. Hey I can agree with that oral one as they all think they are gods gift to women with their tongue and want to do it for hours... but that isn't the point here. Proving you have many faces and boobie shots... some not your own... and providing the links as promised. So here we go.... I won't link to profiles, but anyone can do a search like I did or look up the names. First Keli introduction: http://www.collarchat.com/m_3202341/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#3202341 Second Keli introduction: http://www.collarchat.com/m_3253322/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#3253774 Keli posting style: http://www.collarchat.com/m_3205865/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#3205865 and http://www.collarchat.com/m_3293417/mpage_5/key_/tm.htm#3293958 CBT introduction: http://www.collarchat.com/m_3839092/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#3839092 Where she is compassionate just as Keli is. CBT posting style: This thread and http://www.collarchat.com/m_3851884/mpage_2/key_/tm.htm#3852406 GoddessinDallas posting style: http://www.collarchat.com/m_1130962/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#1130962 Where she seems to think the same way about sticking a plastic dick in a man's smelling ass just like Keli does and found here: http://www.collarchat.com/m_3260200/mpage_1/key_smelly/tm.htm#3260200 I rest my case now that I have kept my promise.

xxblushesxx -> RE: Pro vs Relationship... (9/20/2011 12:38:19 PM)
Yep. I remembered her. I'm glad someone had the time to look them up.

Arpig -> RE: Pro vs Relationship... (9/20/2011 3:25:51 PM)
Well, personally I don't give a crap who the OP is, I'm going to answer the question, which was... quote: Would you rather have immediate gratification by going with a Pro Domme, or stay on the various websites waiting for THE ONE? A pro domme serves the same basic function as a hooker. If you can't do without and can't find anybody who will give it to you, then you pay for it. Simple, quick, and easy.

PeonForHer -> RE: Pro vs Relationship... (9/20/2011 3:36:11 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Arpig Well, personally I don't give a crap who the OP is, I'm going to answer the question, which was... quote: Would you rather have immediate gratification by going with a Pro Domme, or stay on the various websites waiting for THE ONE? A pro domme serves the same basic function as a hooker. If you can't do without and can't find anybody who will give it to you, then you pay for it. Simple, quick, and easy. Not as simple, quick and easy as finding some suitable porn and cracking one off, though. A hand-shandy a day keeps the doctor away, I always say.

LadyHibiscus -> RE: Pro vs Relationship... (9/20/2011 3:41:47 PM)
Both frugal and efficient! Well done. [:D]

PeonForHer -> RE: Pro vs Relationship... (9/20/2011 4:03:12 PM)
I don't know about 'frugal', Lady Hib. If a woman were to sit down on my bedroom carpet with no knickers on, she'd probably end up preggers. Seems a bit wasteful to me.

zephyroftheNorth -> RE: Pro vs Relationship... (9/20/2011 4:05:10 PM)
Doesn't the squelchiness bother you?

LadyHibiscus -> RE: Pro vs Relationship... (9/20/2011 4:05:37 PM)
So...your carpet has crunchy spots? Ew.

hardcybermaster -> RE: Pro vs Relationship... (9/20/2011 5:08:44 PM)
fuck me. how long did it take? was it really worth it? quote: ORIGINAL: Lockit quote: ORIGINAL: Lockit quote: ORIGINAL: CBTinDALLAS ]I have many relationships in the D/s community. Before you judge my RECENT picture, maybe you should look at yours-if you can even see the old black and white, faded, net covered pic. So you are saying you aren't that other person? You know me... I link my proof. Care to go there, I have a bit of spare time today. So this is a recent picture of you. I did say I had a bit of spare time yesterday, today, not so much, but I took the time to do as promised. I decided to do a little search based on something I saw when I first got to CM a number of years ago. Something about what I saw back then reminded me of something I had been seeing in more recent years. So I took a little walk on the wild side and did a search of female dominants in Dallas, from way back. I actually found more than I thought I would and whoa... I won't record everything I found here as that would take a bit longer than I have today and would be too long, but I think I can highlight enough to prove that you are at least questionable in honesty and with your pictures. Your posting style, word useage and interests give you away. I mean, everyone uses words and everyone may have some similarity in interest and posting sytle, but this much? I think not. I went with those dominants that said the same things, used the same phrases in discribing themselves and in posting style. If you just read the profiles, you can see the similarities. Same location, same pro status, wanting the same professional men with similar discriptions... etc. Then there are the posts here on the forums. That kind of sealed the deal for me. You have a unique sytle of writing. From the style of your nicknames... it was much easier to find you. DallasDominatrix and GoddessinDallas were very interesting, same phrases, same location and pictures! Not of boobies from some young hot body and I would think very real. DallasDominatrix didn't post much, but GoddessinDallas did. Same posting style. These two profiles had some of the same phrases but what was most interesting was the journal post on each being the exact copy found on each profile. Now... the connection between those two profiles with more current profiles. DommeKeliDallas has two introductions and is compassionate just as CBTinDallas is. Seeking the same types of men, same posting style on the boards and whoa those titties! The topics you post about as Keli are similar to the topics you posted about as the Goddess. In one intro as Keli you say you will do what other domina's won't do. In postings by Keli you say there are things you will not do and dislike. Like doing anal sex with a man and you make many comments on those do me submissives that want to do oral. Hey I can agree with that oral one as they all think they are gods gift to women with their tongue and want to do it for hours... but that isn't the point here. Proving you have many faces and boobie shots... some not your own... and providing the links as promised. So here we go.... I won't link to profiles, but anyone can do a search like I did or look up the names. First Keli introduction: http://www.collarchat.com/m_3202341/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#3202341 Second Keli introduction: http://www.collarchat.com/m_3253322/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#3253774 Keli posting style: http://www.collarchat.com/m_3205865/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#3205865 and http://www.collarchat.com/m_3293417/mpage_5/key_/tm.htm#3293958 CBT introduction: http://www.collarchat.com/m_3839092/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#3839092 Where she is compassionate just as Keli is. CBT posting style: This thread and http://www.collarchat.com/m_3851884/mpage_2/key_/tm.htm#3852406 GoddessinDallas posting style: http://www.collarchat.com/m_1130962/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#1130962 Where she seems to think the same way about sticking a plastic dick in a man's smelling ass just like Keli does and found here: http://www.collarchat.com/m_3260200/mpage_1/key_smelly/tm.htm#3260200 I rest my case now that I have kept my promise.

Lockit -> RE: Pro vs Relationship... (9/20/2011 5:12:19 PM)
About twenty minutes tops and yes.

LadyHibiscus -> RE: Pro vs Relationship... (9/20/2011 5:16:18 PM)
Huzzah, Lockit! The truth is out there!

PeonForHer -> RE: Pro vs Relationship... (9/20/2011 5:19:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth Doesn't the squelchiness bother you? That's not a problem, Zeph. As Lady Hib has hinted, it goes crunchy. I like the crackle under my feet as I get up in the mornings. I come over all organic and close to nature and stuff.

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 [4] 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875