RE: William Kristol on the debate (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Owner59 -> RE: William Kristol on the debate (9/24/2011 6:02:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:

I think a lot of people would prefer a "slobby tubby" who thinks and acts like a real man over "uh uh uh" meterosexual boy any day


Okay ... go ahead and run Christie... you just gotta promise me that if he gets the party's nod you guys will do the right thing and find a running mate that looks like Art Carney


Christy isn`t running for POTUS in '12'.

He hasn`t even finished his 2nd year here in NJ.A half term governor isn`t going to win president,no matter what party or how popular they are.

There`s been rumors that he plans to run, using Jersey as a spring board.

It wouldn`t look good him announcing, half way through his 1st term.It would confirm criticism that he`s in it for himself and not here to make Jersey a better state.

And obviously,cons haven`t gotten the memo yet but his approval rating has tanked.

Newser) – Maybe the message here is: Don’t mess with teachers. Chris Christie’s approval rating has dropped, according to a new Bloomberg poll, with more than half of New Jersey residents now saying they wouldn’t support his reelection. Respondents objected to a variety of Christie’s policies, with 65% opposing his cuts in education spending, 58% opposing his removal of a surcharge on the state’s highest earners, and 51% opposing the cancellation of a planned tunnel to New York.

Christie’s favorability rating is now at 43%, while teachers, whom he tussled with on benefits and pay, are at 76%. “Teachers I know got laid off because of him,” said one respondent. “He’s not in favor of the average working person.” That view seemed pervasive: 68% believed Christie stands with the business community, while just 22% said he sides with “ordinary New Jerseyans.”

http://www.newser.com/story/122252/chris-christies-approval-rating-tanks.html

Jersey`s credit rating was just lowered and the joy ride in the state trooper chopper and his mishandling of it after made him look weak and hypocritical,considering everything is getting cut.We had the nations best schools when he took over and seems bent on ruining that too.

I really don`t get the appeal Christie has for cons nation-wide.He`s a dunce and has fucked up quite a bit and hasn`t really delivered here.Maybe it`s the "fox affect",leaving cons uninformed and out of the loop,but he`s a loser.

But if you cons want him,you can have him.He`s no Reagan,believe me.Reagan could at least act like a president.

The only explaination I can come up with as to why Chris Christie looks so good to republicans is that the present slate of republican candidates looks so awful.

Christie as superstar,......... really shows that are many cons that are jusrt completely clueless.

There`s no "there" there with him.lol

If cons are thinking he`s the spark that`ll "energise the base",they need to get a fuck`n grip. [:D]




Fellow -> RE: William Kristol on the debate (9/24/2011 6:20:44 PM)

I agree with W. Kristol: Republican candidates look bad. Ron Paul is a different story, but he is not a mainstream Republican anyway. W. Kristol, of course, is not allowed to mention Paul. Lot of things will happen between now and the summer 2012. I hope Ron Paul will run as an independent. With Obama approval rating in negative territory he will have real chance of winning. Especially, when he will find a way to communicate a clear vision what his policies would be.  Now Paul is scary for many who think lot of things will be taken away from them. The economy will tank further for sure, and it will increase Paul's chances.




imperatrixx -> RE: William Kristol on the debate (9/24/2011 6:24:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967

We'll get on that when you retroactively denounce all the fucking hippy protesters who spit and threw shit on our returning Vietnam Vets... It's only been 36 years, you hypocritical Bigot.



What they did was completely wrong and disgusting. They were rabid ideological idiots.

Your turn.




Owner59 -> RE: William Kristol on the debate (9/24/2011 6:32:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: imperatrixx


quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967

We'll get on that when you retroactively denounce all the fucking hippy protesters who spit and threw shit on our returning Vietnam Vets... It's only been 36 years, you hypocritical Bigot.



What they did was completely wrong and disgusting. They were rabid ideological idiots.

Your turn.

It also never happened.

A myth.




FirmhandKY -> RE: William Kristol on the debate (9/24/2011 7:02:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

quote:

ORIGINAL: imperatrixx

quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967

We'll get on that when you retroactively denounce all the fucking hippy protesters who spit and threw shit on our returning Vietnam Vets... It's only been 36 years, you hypocritical Bigot.


What they did was completely wrong and disgusting. They were rabid ideological idiots.

Your turn.

It also never happened.

A myth.

It's a myth that it's a myth, Owner.  [8D]

Firm




FirmhandKY -> RE: William Kristol on the debate (9/24/2011 7:05:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

As for your question Firm....no I don't,but I do believe that in the context sanity used it that it was meant as one....and further I believe you know that....so why the question ?

I agree that it was meant in a belittling manner.

My point was harking back to several arguments I've had with other "liberals" about the use of the term "neo-con".  I don't know if you were one of them.

The argument was that the use of "neo-con" was simply a descriptive, non-pejorative term.  My contention was that any term intended as an insult, is an insult.  Be it "neo-con" or "metrosexual".

Firm




Owner59 -> RE: William Kristol on the debate (9/24/2011 7:11:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

quote:

ORIGINAL: imperatrixx

quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967

We'll get on that when you retroactively denounce all the fucking hippy protesters who spit and threw shit on our returning Vietnam Vets... It's only been 36 years, you hypocritical Bigot.


What they did was completely wrong and disgusting. They were rabid ideological idiots.

Your turn.

It also never happened.

A myth.

It's a myth that it's a myth, Owner.  [8D]

Firm




Prove it.

Show one news artical,one police report,one news reel or vid, showing such a thing happened.

You cons had to make shit up back then as you have to now.Why would that have changed?




FirmhandKY -> RE: William Kristol on the debate (9/24/2011 7:16:55 PM)

Owner,

I'm not even going to bother looking again.  I've done it before, and I'm familiar with the "myth" argument, and know that it is flawed.

I'd ask that you consider looking yourself, and when you do so, work it like you were in debate class, and had to take a position that you disagreed with.

Firm




Owner59 -> RE: William Kristol on the debate (9/24/2011 7:18:20 PM)

Firm falls flat.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: William Kristol on the debate (9/24/2011 7:19:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Firm falls flat.


The day we need a history lesson from a comic book character we'll let you know.




FirmhandKY -> RE: William Kristol on the debate (9/24/2011 7:25:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Firm falls flat.

Owner,

I personally was in the military starting in 1979, and met and worked with active duty soldiers who claim that this happened to them.

Could they have been making it up?  Possibly.  But the events they described to me were accurate as to times and locations, and their service.

Also, the last time this came up, there was at least one public figure who served in the military in Vietnam to whom it occurred and went on record with the details in order to debunk the "myth that it is a myth".  I don't remember who, but it wasn't that long ago.

All I am doing is suggesting you go a bit beyond your own biases and do a little original research, rather than repeat comforting ideological speaking points that fit your own biases.

Grow a little, in other words.

Firm




Owner59 -> RE: William Kristol on the debate (9/24/2011 7:29:14 PM)

So ya`ll think the extreme dirty tricks like death panels,the new black panther smear and Braitbart,birthers etc., are recent events?


Please children.






willbeurdaddy -> RE: William Kristol on the debate (9/24/2011 7:29:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Firm falls flat.

Owner,

I personally was in the military starting in 1979, and met and worked with active duty soldiers who claim that this happened to them.

Could they have been making it up?  Possibly.  But the events they described to me were accurate as to times and locations, and their service.

Also, the last time this came up, there was at least one public figure who served in the military in Vietnam to whom it occurred and went on record with the details in order to debunk the "myth that it is a myth".  I don't remember who, but it wasn't that long ago.

All I am doing is suggesting you go a bit beyond your own biases and do a little original research, rather than repeat comforting ideological speaking points that fit your own biases.

Grow a little, in other words.

Firm



Dont humor him. It happened every single fucking day and he knows it. I had guys leaving Brooke in a wheelchair that were harassed.




Owner59 -> RE: William Kristol on the debate (9/24/2011 7:42:47 PM)

Right,..after you were pull`n GIs of the field at 17 years old?

Phony.

And bullshit.

You keep good company there,Firm.[:D]




slvemike4u -> RE: William Kristol on the debate (9/24/2011 7:49:05 PM)

Very true Firm,as is the use of "leftists" or "libtards".... And I know a certain poster that is fond of doing such things,in that light I would ask that you never interpet how I address that poster to suggest that I would converse with you in a similar fashion.
One gets the respect he shows ....




willbeurdaddy -> RE: William Kristol on the debate (9/24/2011 7:55:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Right,..after you were pull`n GIs of the field at 17 years old?

Phony.

And bullshit.

You keep good company there,Firm.[:D]


You cant even cross the street without help, much less subtract.




Sanity -> RE: William Kristol on the debate (9/24/2011 8:09:01 PM)


Youre a hypocrite to single me out for... what is it, a supposed lack of "tolerance" over my metrosexual boy remark when it was in response to, what was it, a "sloppy tubby" remark

Police your own before you start crying about others

Its just tit for tat, if youre really this sensitive, insecure and thin skinned you probably shouldnt be posting here

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Very true Firm,as is the use of "leftists" or "libtards".... And I know a certain poster that is fond of doing such things,in that light I would ask that you never interpet how I address that poster to suggest that I would converse with you in a similar fashion.
One gets the respect he shows ....




Owner59 -> RE: William Kristol on the debate (9/24/2011 8:11:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Youre a hypocrite to single me out for... what is it, a supposed lack of "tolerance" over my metrosexual boy remark when it was in response to, what was it, a "sloppy tubby" remark

Police your own before you start crying about others

Its just tit for tat, if youre really this sensitive, insecure and thin skinned you probably shouldnt be posting here

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Very true Firm,as is the use of "leftists" or "libtards".... And I know a certain poster that is fond of doing such things,in that light I would ask that you never interpet how I address that poster to suggest that I would converse with you in a similar fashion.
One gets the respect he shows ....



here....



[sm=violin.gif]




LadyPact -> RE: William Kristol on the debate (9/24/2011 8:17:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59
It also never happened.

A myth.

Baloney.




Sanity -> RE: William Kristol on the debate (9/24/2011 8:41:55 PM)


Thanks zero, thats very appropriate accompaniment for crybaby mikes wailing [:D]

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Youre a hypocrite to single me out for... what is it, a supposed lack of "tolerance" over my metrosexual boy remark when it was in response to, what was it, a "sloppy tubby" remark

Police your own before you start crying about others

Its just tit for tat, if youre really this sensitive, insecure and thin skinned you probably shouldnt be posting here

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Very true Firm,as is the use of "leftists" or "libtards".... And I know a certain poster that is fond of doing such things,in that light I would ask that you never interpet how I address that poster to suggest that I would converse with you in a similar fashion.
One gets the respect he shows ....



here....



[sm=violin.gif]





Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875