Support (international) terrorism – why not?

Support (international) terrorism – why not? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Antikapitalista -> Support (international) terrorism – why not? (9/26/2011 3:29:15 PM)
I wonder why there is so much moral panic about terrorism... I do support terrorism, especially international terrorism (while somehow condemning domestic terrorism), purely on humanitarian grounds. The logic is simple: terrorism greatly saves human lives and property, while still being able to achieve the same political goals as war. So, why is there so much moral panic and fear-mongering about terrorism?! More specifically: why is war celebrated and terrorism is condemned?

Lucylastic -> RE: Support (international) terrorism – why not? (9/26/2011 3:32:07 PM)
lose someone to terrorism and then tell me how you feel until then you are beneath contempt bye bye

Antikapitalista -> RE: Support (international) terrorism – why not? (9/26/2011 3:36:31 PM)
Lose someone in war and then tell me how you feel. Until then, you are beneath contempt.

DomKen -> RE: Support (international) terrorism – why not? (9/26/2011 3:44:04 PM)
You are a loathsome and repellent excuse for a human being. Terrorism does not save lives and does not prevent war. It is a cowards way of waging war against an enemy he cannot defeat with ideas or arms.

Slavehandsome -> RE: Support (international) terrorism – why not? (9/26/2011 3:46:56 PM)
Every day we pay taxes, we support terrorism, war, and tyranny.

Lucylastic -> RE: Support (international) terrorism – why not? (9/26/2011 3:46:57 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Antikapitalista Lose someone in war and then tell me how you feel. Until then, you are beneath contempt. I have, whats your point...my point still stands

Slavehandsome -> RE: Support (international) terrorism – why not? (9/26/2011 3:48:31 PM)
How is it different between losing someone in war versus losing someone in terrorism?

Lucylastic -> RE: Support (international) terrorism – why not? (9/26/2011 3:49:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Slavehandsome Every day we pay taxes, we support terrorism, war, and tyranny. just stop supporting the GOP then, its easy sheesh

Slavehandsome -> RE: Support (international) terrorism – why not? (9/26/2011 3:50:21 PM)
The Democrats got us into Libya.

Lucylastic -> RE: Support (international) terrorism – why not? (9/26/2011 3:50:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Slavehandsome How is it different between losing someone in war versus losing someone in terrorism? ihope you never have to find out

Slavehandsome -> RE: Support (international) terrorism – why not? (9/26/2011 3:52:13 PM)
But how is it different losing someone to war versus losing someone to terrorism?

Lucylastic -> RE: Support (international) terrorism – why not? (9/26/2011 3:52:17 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Slavehandsome The Democrats got us into Libya. Nato got you into libya

Slavehandsome -> RE: Support (international) terrorism – why not? (9/26/2011 3:53:26 PM)
So NATO are terrorists?

Lucylastic -> RE: Support (international) terrorism – why not? (9/26/2011 3:55:04 PM)
and that has to do with what?

Slavehandsome -> RE: Support (international) terrorism – why not? (9/26/2011 3:56:23 PM)
If Libya isn't Obama's 'fault', then Iraq isn't W's 'fault'.

Antikapitalista -> RE: Support (international) terrorism – why not? (9/26/2011 3:59:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic I have, whats your point...my point still stands Well, my point was exactly the same as yours... Does it mean that it is now beneath contempt?

Lucylastic -> RE: Support (international) terrorism – why not? (9/26/2011 4:01:21 PM)
LMAO hahhahhahahhahahhahahha awwwwww thats so cute, adding nothing from nothing means iraq isnt bushes fault? careful dear chap you are in danger of twirling so fast you are gonna disapear up your own hole. enjoy the ride. Snortle

Slavehandsome -> RE: Support (international) terrorism – why not? (9/26/2011 4:02:04 PM)
So how is losing someone to war different from losing someone to terrorism?

Antikapitalista -> RE: Support (international) terrorism – why not? (9/26/2011 4:03:19 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Slavehandsome So NATO are terrorists? Now Aggressive Terrorist Organization?

Antikapitalista -> RE: Support (international) terrorism – why not? (9/26/2011 4:06:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: Slavehandsome The Democrats got us into Libya. Nato got you into libya Obviously not, Slavehandsome is right. They had started bombing Libya almost 2 weeks before they shielded themselves behind NATO.

Page: [1] 2 3 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875