Epytropos -> RE: Free Market question (9/27/2011 2:34:06 PM)
|
Fraud implies that someone has been tricked. If someone has been tricked, that in turn implies that they had no agency in what occurred. If they failed to exercise due diligence, then they accepted fraud as an acceptable risk. If they accepted it, they had agency in it, which means it wasn't fraud. At least, that's how I imagine the reasoning would go. Personally I don't fully agree with it, but I could definitely see a compelling argument being made in a social darwinist or objectivist model.
|
|
|
|