Owner59 -> RE: Mass Physics Grad scooped in terror sting (9/29/2011 8:28:39 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: samboct I've built and flown model airplanes for some 40 years. This is one of those areas where there's lots of fantasy, and not much math. 1) There is a weight limit of 55 lbs for model aircraft in the US- waivers have to be granted if you're going to fly anything larger. 2) While some models can readily exceed 100 mph, and other models can carry a payload of 5 lbs or so, its not so easy to combine the two. Furthermore, there are going to be range issues- model airplanes that can exceed 100 mph can only do so for a few minutes- they either burn through a lot of fuel or batteries in a hurry. 3) Making a bomb that can actually do damage to a building requires both an explosive and a casing. Often, bombs have more mass in casings than in explosives. The casing becomes shrapnel which does damage- often blast does very little. 4) Using conventional explosives in WWII, a general purpose bomb weighed 500 lbs. A bomb this size would readily take out a house or even several houses close together, but a building the size of the Capitol or the Pentagon- which was barely mussed when an airliner whacked in? How much damage can a lousy 5 lb bomb do- especially one carried in a framework of very light materials which will help absorb the blast? This whole idea is fantasy.... Sam Well that`s probably true.But the criminal intent was there.It would have been more symbolic than anything. I disagree that the jet didn`t do much damage.Over-all no,but to the impact point,quite a lot.The fire ball penetrated 3 or 4 concrete walls into the center. The model wouldn`t have scraped paint off but might have been a PR coup for the radials.
|
|
|
|