RE: It's not him; it's us

RE: It's not him; it's us (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Sanity -> RE: It's not him; it's us (10/1/2011 9:28:02 AM)
Statements of fact isnt the same as "blaming" [:D]

mnottertail -> RE: It's not him; it's us (10/1/2011 9:28:37 AM)
http://www.network54.com/Forum/56912/message/1288331567/Bush+blamed+Clinton+for+a+lot+of+things lol. what a worm.

mnottertail -> RE: It's not him; it's us (10/1/2011 9:58:05 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Statements of fact isnt the same as "blaming" [:D] You are a man that will not be blamed then. Jack the Ripper.

Sanity -> RE: It's not him; it's us (10/1/2011 10:03:07 AM)
Uh huh, "what a worm" is right. Did you not even bother to read any of your ridiculous cites... [:D]

slvemike4u -> RE: It's not him; it's us (10/1/2011 10:11:33 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RacerJim quote: ORIGINAL: Moonhead Why is it less acceptable for the Kenyan to blame stuff on the chimp than it was for the chimp to blame stuff on Clinton? It isn't like Clinton left your economy in half as bad a mess as the chimp did, after all... Maybe it's less acceptable because the Kenyan isn't eligible to be POTUS in the first place. Nevermind that "the chimp" didn't make the economy half as bad a mess during eight years as the Kenyan has in less than three years. Is birther nonsense considered a kink? I am trying to be careful with the whole new politeness here....so do we view birther nonsense as a legitimate kink(one that is seemingly highly favored amongst the rasict set),however if it is not accepted as a kink....I can slam the hell out of it ...can't I?

tazzygirl -> RE: It's not him; it's us (10/1/2011 10:19:47 AM)
Its not a kink, darlin.

slvemike4u -> RE: It's not him; it's us (10/1/2011 10:24:56 AM)
Oh,well that's good to know,that being what it is than it is totally acceptable for me to state(without violating TOS ) that it is a belief clung to by a group of idiotic rasict assholes? one can't be too careful these days aout ruffling feathers and all [:)]

tazzygirl -> RE: It's not him; it's us (10/1/2011 10:40:47 AM)
Yeah, those feathers can get you into alot of trouble. [;)]

Fightdirecto -> RE: It's not him; it's us (10/1/2011 11:03:15 AM)
The buck was successfully passed... [image]local://upfiles/42188/57957B834ED642848526869B5A5D2074.jpg[/image]

MasterSlaveLA -> RE: It's not him; it's us (10/1/2011 11:29:47 AM)
The only thing "soft" is Baroccoli OLiar's polling numbers... he's grasping at straws.

TheHeretic -> RE: It's not him; it's us (10/1/2011 11:37:08 AM)
Well, I can agree with your post regarding those poll numbers, MSLA (in fact, the best approval he's getting at the moment is from Rasmussen), but there is just one little thing. It's very easy, too easy even because he provides so many opportunities, to question and criticize this President without resorting to the stupid name-calling that the left so embraced during the Bush administration. Must you follow their path through the gutter?

tazzygirl -> RE: It's not him; it's us (10/1/2011 11:38:29 AM)
Not everyone on the left embraced that, Rich.

TheHeretic -> RE: It's not him; it's us (10/1/2011 11:39:53 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Not everyone on the left embraced that, Rich. True, Tazzy. A whole lot just stood back, and smirked in condoning silence.

tazzygirl -> RE: It's not him; it's us (10/1/2011 11:44:52 AM)
hmm.. I wasnt silent. But thats just me.

MasterSlaveLA -> RE: It's not him; it's us (10/1/2011 11:48:24 AM)
I hate the fucker (for his policies)... he had one of the greatest opportunites to be the hero of the free world and fucking blew it over political ideology and social engineering. Fuck him!!! Kudos to you for your generosity, but he's a scumbag in my book, and I'm more than comfortable in saying so. Again, kudos to you for wanting to stay above the fray, but when he now blames US for HIS and HIS ADMINISTRATION'S failings?!! FUCK HIM!!! quote: ORIGINAL: TheHeretic Well, I can agree with your post regarding those poll numbers, MSLA (in fact, the best approval he's getting at the moment is from Rasmussen), but there is just one little thing. It's very easy, too easy even because he provides so many opportunities, to question and criticize this President without resorting to the stupid name-calling that the left so embraced during the Bush administration. Must you follow their path through the gutter?

TheHeretic -> RE: It's not him; it's us (10/1/2011 11:51:16 AM)
See? That wasn't so hard, was it? Of course, now stating that I want to "stay above the fray," may hurt your credibility even more. [:D]

MasterSlaveLA -> RE: It's not him; it's us (10/1/2011 11:55:07 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheHeretic See? That wasn't so hard, was it? I stated, "FUCK HIM!!!" (more than once) and called him a "scumbag"... so I'm not so sure that puts me outside the woods on ths one. [:D] lol

Lucylastic -> RE: It's not him; it's us (10/1/2011 11:57:46 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheHeretic quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Not everyone on the left embraced that, Rich. True, Tazzy. A whole lot just stood back, and smirked in condoning silence. would thou like me to point out where I feel "some" people stood by in smirking silence on other parts of this board? both sides , just to be fair?

TheHeretic -> RE: It's not him; it's us (10/1/2011 12:03:36 PM)
You don't really do, "both sides" very well, do you, Lucy? The most consistent displays of hate speech towards this President on the board are coming from a particular UK poster who thinks he's amusing and clever (his mother must have told him so).

Lucylastic -> RE: It's not him; it's us (10/1/2011 12:09:12 PM)
I can count ten right of left who have far more depth of hate than Mood who has consistantly explained why he calls him the Kenyan. yet you NEVER comment on those

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875