Saddam Hussein predicted in 1993 that America would overspend on wars (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Iamsemisweet -> Saddam Hussein predicted in 1993 that America would overspend on wars (10/9/2011 8:27:14 PM)

http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/10/saddam-hussein-predicted-in-1993-that-america-would-overspend-di

When coalition forces marched into Baghdad in April of 2003, one of the many spoils of war were hundreds of hours of audio recording between Saddam Hussein and his inner circle. In the forthcoming The Saddam Tapes: The Inner Workings of a Tyrant’s Regime, 1978–2001, transcripts provide a rare glimpse into the dictator’s inner monologue on everything from the Iran-Iraq War to relations with George W. Bush’s administration and its ties to oil and gas companies.
But it is a passage from a January 1993 meeting on relations with the incoming  Clinton administration that offers perhaps the most penetrating look at Hussein’s foresight and strategic acumen. In describing “the new international situation,” the late Iraqi leader looks into the future, and analyzes American foreign policy—making predictions that in the intervening years, in part, come to pass. Here, in an excerpted portion, he discusses the United States’ foray into Somalia in the early 1990s:
Saddam: “If the Americans continue such politics, they are going to face major troubles. Why would anyone want to elect an American? What did he say to him to influence him? He will probably say to him that he promises to improve the economic situation. How could he improve the economic situation with American soldiers spread all over the world?
 
Their economy will never improve with the expenses they spent in the Gulf and in Europe. They spent $68 billion in the Gulf, and in Europe, they spent $128 billion. If America does not withdraw its troops from all over the world, its economy could never improve. America is not in its youth phase. America is at the edge of elderliness and at the beginning phase of old age. This is nature, once you reach [inaudible]. The man might delay the deterioration; however, I cannot imagine the deterioration continuing. I mean it is impossible to give up its role of interference and influencing, and the latest foolishness made people apprehend it more and forced the blocks to move faster than before.
 
If America implemented a good policy, made a political difference in the world, emphasized improving the economy, etc, America would earn more respect from the rest of the world; however, it is not afraid at all. This means it is not aware of the consequences. That might result in close relations with China, the Soviet Union and India, Japan with Asia. Germany will develop to be an industrial threat and France will overspread the world markets. It will cause a major chaos all over the world.”
 
Unidentified Man: “Sir, yesterday, as Your Excellency knows, the American president stated that the first thing he needs to do is allocate funds for the American troops overseas, [inaudible]. He made such a statement yesterday at the conference.”
 
Saddam: “It is impossible for him to do that in order to improve his economy. He could save a billion dollars from here, a million dollars from somewhere else, another two million from another place that could be useful, but it would not heal his wound that is so deep it cannot be healed unless he turns to the military budget.”





SpanishMatMaster -> RE: Saddam Hussein predicted in 1993 that America would overspend on wars (10/9/2011 8:34:08 PM)

Eisenhower predicted it about 1953.
But the USA have no overspent on wars. They have "underincomed" on richs.




popeye1250 -> RE: Saddam Hussein predicted in 1993 that America would overspend on wars (10/9/2011 11:48:55 PM)

Big whoops, Pee Wee Herman could have made that prediction.




Fellow -> RE: Saddam Hussein predicted in 1993 that America would overspend on wars (10/10/2011 3:14:54 AM)

Whatever image politicians project publicly, behind the scenes the global politics for major players is related to cheap access to resources. Imperial politics worked well for the US during post WW II era. The US gained a lot: they consume disproportionally to their population (~5 times) and own a large proportion of the World's wealth. Russians who tried to copy the policies got only scraps and ended up paying more for their positions than they benefited.  Russians (Soviet Union) lost because lack of economic strength behind the politics. The last was weakened by low productivity, cheap natural resources prices (imposed by the US) and strong US dollar. Last twenty years or so there has been a transition from Cold War politics to something else. The  US has not played its cards well. They have shot themselves into the head. The two parties have essentially destroyed the country. It has become corrupt, productive economy essential for the empire has been shipped abroad, international reputation has been ruined. Saddam was no prophet: US opposition predicted the fall almost continuously during Cold War period. It did not have to happen. NWO project based on neo-liberal globalization the US and the World elites try to execute is on shaky ground. The most importantly, it leaves out the US general population as a beneficiary. 




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
2.929688E-02