Contentment
Posts: 63
Joined: 5/27/2011 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Awareness The word which comes to mind is "milquetoast". You define yourself in terms of "not being submissive" but frankly your constant references to patience and being willing to wait are all attributes of the standard vanilla approach to women. Frankly, I strongly suspect you just get off on holding a woman down while you're fucking her and probably have some sadistic desires which you've picked up from low-grade porn. From this, you've inferred you must be dominant, but you really don't exhibit any of the traits and look more like you're trying to construct a persona which you think will be pleasing - an approach which totally goes against any notions you might have of dominance. The best I could say is that you might be a top, but that's about it. I will agree that I'm probably closer to vanilla than a general dominant Vs submissive. I am not submissive, which it is why I list it as such instead of specifically calling myself a dom. I am stubborn, free-willed, and not about to serve another without my own selfish reasons. I would make a very lousy sub, slave, or pet. It is true that I try to be pleasing on such a site. I don't really see the error in this. Every other user's page does this to a certain degree. Some less than others. In reality, I'm good natured as a general rule. Perhaps your version of dominance prefers cruelty, mine doesn't. I believe in dominance, I take action when needed. I will say no, use means needed to solve a situation when it arises, but I'm not a fool that honestly believes that the dominant one is the one that gives the most orders. The dominant one is the one in control when it matters. To this end, I often find positive reinforcement, optimism and social behavior much more effective than mere violent disciplinary measures. When needed, I prefer the pressure points or binding techniques to be most useful. Restraints or just holds also function. I do like creating rules and am keen on punishments for broken rules, but I won't create a rule that I can't consistently punish as it's a wasted effort. But this is a personality thing, not a sexual thing. I'm not overly interested in sex*. I "get off" on reactions. This isn't strictly sexual, but often can be. Pain in others is often a reaction to things, this can be fun. This could also be called torture, though I don't really think it qualifies. I find involuntary reactions to be especially amusing. Pleasure, surprise, excitement, and sometimes violent reactions can also be very enjoyable. I am on this site because I'm seeking a female or females that are interested in this sort of thing. I'd prefer to find an output for my odd desires where the other party would be willing, as opposed to finding an unwilling participant. *Yeah, not kidding. I'm a male that really isn't terribly interested in sex. It's not an issue of not able to get sex, but seriously a lack of desire for it. I enjoy the reactions involved with the other party, certainly, but I can be just as happy with other, non-sexual reactions (does depend on what happens).
< Message edited by Contentment -- 10/14/2011 10:25:38 PM >
|