RE: Court Rules: Atheism is a Religion (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


gungadin09 -> RE: Court Rules: Atheism is a Religion (10/15/2011 1:10:14 AM)

Let's see if i can get this right. Strong atheism means believing that god does not exist. Without qualifying the term, just saying "atheism" or "atheist" can mean a number of different things. For example, the word "atheist" can mean someone who hasn't decided to believe there isn't a god, but hasn't decided to believe there is one, either.

pam




SpanishMatMaster -> RE: Court Rules: Atheism is a Religion (10/15/2011 1:23:50 AM)

Enjoy the American way, blnymph . Ich gehe jetzt zur Demo.

quote:

ORIGINAL: gungadin09

Let's see if i can get this right. Strong atheism means believing that god does not exist. Without qualifying the term, just saying "atheism" or "atheist" can mean a number of different things. For example, the word "atheist" can mean someone who hasn't decided to believe there isn't a god, but hasn't decided to believe there is one, either.

pam

Correct :)




DeviantlyD -> RE: Court Rules: Atheism is a Religion (10/15/2011 1:29:01 AM)

Oh brother. [8|]




gungadin09 -> RE: Court Rules: Atheism is a Religion (10/15/2011 1:44:05 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


In my opinion the "stretch" is to talk about Atheism as if it was some kind of monolithic belief system. "Atheism" can mean more than one thing, and therein (I think) lies much of the problem.

K.



Out of curiosity, do You believe that any of the word's possible meanings qualify as a religion?

ETA: Do You think strong atheism does? Do You think the belief system of the prisoner in question does?

pam




MyMasterStephen -> RE: Court Rules: Atheism is a Religion (10/15/2011 2:03:31 AM)

TLDR

But, just out of interest, what do these atheists study in their study group...?




DarthVaderOfLove -> RE: Court Rules: Atheism is a Religion (10/15/2011 3:16:41 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HeatherMcLeather

quote:

Atheism is as much of a religion as pacifism is a battle strategy.
It may be an excellent analogy as SMM contends, but the court disagrees with you, so it really doesn't matter that much does it? [:D]

I'm not sure they would disagree with me. Pacifism was the battle strategy that Gandhi used to get the British out of India. Just because there was no guns involved doesn't make it any less effective.

Atheism answers the question "Is there a God?", as effectively as a religion does. Isn't that what religion is for? To provide an answer for the big unknown? What if the answers is "I don't know and I don't care"? It's still an answer.

I guess what should first be determined is what constitutes a religion. What purpose does it serve in a person's life and could Atheism provide a similar function.




GotSteel -> RE: Court Rules: Atheism is a Religion (10/15/2011 5:58:51 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
While I'm pleased that the court allowed the formation of the study group, I find it difficult to imagine what else besides a Deity could occupy "a place parallel to that filled by God" in Theism. Somewhere along the way to this decision we've fallen down the rabbit hole if jailed brokers can start religious study groups on the grounds that their god is Money.



I find it hard to believe that this precedent would ever be extended to capitalism but I agree that said definition was a trip down the rabbit hole. However that trip didn't happen in this atheism case. Fittingly that definition comes from a court case in the 60's.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0398_0333_ZO.html

People were being denied conscientious objector status and thrown in jail because their morality wasn't considered sufficiently religious in nature. So in order to give the rest of us equal protection under the law, we've ended up with a definition of religion that doesn't necessarily have anything to do with religion.




SpanishMatMaster -> RE: Court Rules: Atheism is a Religion (10/15/2011 6:59:50 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarthVaderOfLove
I guess what should first be determined is what constitutes a religion.
Page 17, first posting. Maybe you can do something with it. Best regards.




GotSteel -> RE: Court Rules: Atheism is a Religion (10/15/2011 7:32:59 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarthVaderOfLove
I guess what should first be determined is what constitutes a religion.


Yeah....I've got to agree with Spanish on this one. Last time I had a thread on atheism it went 50 pages without any resolution as to the definition of atheism. Not only would you have to get that solved, you also need to get a consensus of what religion and belief are to get anywhere in the squabble here. [sm=banghead.gif]






Real0ne -> RE: Court Rules: Atheism is a Religion (10/15/2011 7:34:27 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SpanishMatMaster

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarthVaderOfLove
I guess what should first be determined is what constitutes a religion.
Page 17, first posting. Maybe you can do something with it. Best regards.


I already have page 17 second post response to yours.




Real0ne -> RE: Court Rules: Atheism is a Religion (10/15/2011 7:41:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarthVaderOfLove
I guess what should first be determined is what constitutes a religion.


Yeah....I've got to agree with Spanish on this one. Last time I had a thread on atheism it went 50 pages without any resolution as to the definition of atheism. Not only would you have to get that solved, you also need to get a consensus of what religion and belief are to get anywhere in the squabble here. [sm=banghead.gif]





Its because people are  trying to create new definitions that do not exist.

in the second post on page 17 I explain the whole sequence of events.

]A]Theos the root means *no God*

The court imo called it correctly


quote:

Atheism is, among other things, a school of thought that takes a position on religion, the existence and importance of a supreme being, and a code of ethics. As such, we are satisfied that it qualifies as Kaufman’s religion for purposes of the First Amendment claims he attempting to raise.


and I expanded it in several other posts to show how core belief as stated is religion.


This is from the judge bouviers law dictionary:

quote:

provides that" congress shall make no lawrespecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." See tory, Const. 1870; Miller, Const. 645. Congress cannot pass a law for the government of a territory which prohibits the free exercise of religion; 98 U. S. 162; religion is not defined in the constitution, its meaning there must be ascertained elsewhere.

Jefferson was the leader of the movement for placing this clause in the constitution; id. See 12 Hening's Stat. 84; 1 Jeff. Works 45,79; 2 id. 355; 8 id. 113.

This provision and that relating to religious tests (q. v.) are limitations upon the power of congress only ; Cooley, Const. 205; perhaps the fourteenth amendment may give additional securities if needful; id.

By establishment of religion is meant the setting up of a state church, or at least the conferring upon one church of special favors which are denied to others; 1 Tuck. Bla. Com. App. 296; 2 id. App. n. G.   <--DomKen is having a bird with this one)



With the exception of these provisions, the preservation of religious liberty is left to the states. The various state guarantees have been summed up by Judge Cooley, who says that under American constitutions the following things are unlawful:
1. Any law respecting the establishment of religion.
2. Compulsory support by taxation or otherwise of religious instruction.
3. Compulsory attendance upon religious worship.
4. Restraints upon the free exercise of religion according to the dictates of conscience.
5. Restraints upon the expression of religious belief.
Const. Lim. 575.



ATHEIST. One who denies or does not believe in the existence of a God.

Such persons are, at common law, incapable of giving testimony under oath, and, therefore, incompetent witnesses. Bull. N. P. 392. See 1 Atk. Ch. 21; 2 Cow. 431, 433, n.; 5 Bias. 18; 13 Vt. 362; 17 111. 541. To render a witness competent, there must be superadded a belief that there will be a punishment for swearing falsely, either in world or the next; 14 Mass. 184; 1 Greenl. Ev. § 370; Tayl. Ev. 1175. See 7 Conn. 68; 18 Johns. 98; 17 Wend. 460; 2 W. & S. 262; 26 Pa. 274; 10 Ohio 121. The disability resulting from atheism has been wholly or partly removed in many of the states of the United States; 1 Greenl. Ev. § 369, n. See, generally, 1 Sm. L. Cas. 737.


BELIEF. Conviction of the mind, arising not from actual perception or knowledge, but by way or inference, or from evidence received or information derived from others.

Belief may evidently be stronger or weaker according to the weight of evidence adduced in favor of the proposition to which belief is granted or refused; 4 S. & R. 137;



You can have a strong of weak belief it does not change the fact that it is still a belief.






Real0ne -> RE: Court Rules: Atheism is a Religion (10/15/2011 8:05:23 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: gungadin09

Let's see if i can get this right. Strong atheism means believing that god does not exist. Without qualifying the term, just saying "atheism" or "atheist" can mean a number of different things. For example, the word "atheist" can mean someone who hasn't decided to believe there isn't a god, but hasn't decided to believe there is one, either.

pam


Now there is a rabbit hole.

If a weak athiest does not know then the more proper definition would follow "gnosis" as I said several times already.

The word to adjust would be [A]"gnostic" since agnostic is derived from gnosis.

Right now people are linguistically deficient and frankly imo just throwing shit at the wall trying to make something stick.

Its pretty difficult to have a weak "no God" or a weak "void God", however using gnosis stipulating no knowledge of God while still technically a subset of atheist "no God" expresses a weaker position on the matter.

It seems pretty well defined already without too much modification needed if at all

Its sort of like a light bulb, how do you get a light that is 1/2 on?

Its either on or off.  (glowing dimmly btw is not 1/2 on LOL)





Real0ne -> RE: Court Rules: Atheism is a Religion (10/15/2011 8:39:24 AM)

Normally I do not use wiki but I have to admit they have this one fairly correct.


quote:


Religion (plural religions)

    A collection of practices, based on beliefs and teachings that are highly valued or sacred.

(look at the level of conviction on "both" sides!)

    Any practice that someone or some group is seriously devoted to.

        (At this point, Star Trek has really become a religion.)

  Any ongoing spiritual practice one engages in, in order to shape their character or improve traits of their personality.

  An ideological and traditional heritage.

      If you examine various churches throughout the world, you will find religion expressed in diverse ways.

[edit] Usage notes

Generally speaking, certain groups that do not acknowledge the existence of one or more deities, such as Buddhism, are still religious, though some people prefer a definition of religion that discourages non-theistic groups from identifying as religious.

Others are in favor of a more inclusive definition of religion that recognizes that everyone has their own set of religious beliefs.

Avoid calling religious institutions that should be called churches, religions.



the suffixes -ous simply mean pertaining to what preceded it and the suffix -ism creates the object out of what preceded it.









Real0ne -> RE: Court Rules: Atheism is a Religion (10/15/2011 8:49:49 AM)

Which of course brings us to the point of:  What gave the state the authority of "ESTABLISHING"  a government respecting NO religion but their own?

Government at least in America should have been with literally no exception "advisory" to the people (not rulers of the people) because in the final analysis it comes down to the court regardless of how much government a country has or has not.  (and the court should be a jury of peers as intended in the constitution, with the judge as an advisor to the court *which IS the jury*)

That is why the purpose of "legitimate" government is to protect "rights", presumably of the "people" as "individuals", OUR rights, not their rights and NOT the people as subject-citizens "under" atheist rule of government.

Therefore the purpose of government is to acknowledge all religion without establishing any of them as a state church, not what they are doing now which is the establishment of atheism as the government religion and destroying all culture to create their own brand of  atheist culture.

You cannot be a subject citizen and have unalienable rights any more than you can be an atheist without the construction of a belief even if that construction is a "decision" to take no position.

Strong weak or indifferent an atheist is still "Godless" and so is an agnostic as a result of the construction by a conscious decision which creates a believe that you will govern yourself in accord with, hence a or "your" personal religion.

Used correctly this could open the door to "self governance" as it was intended and freedom "from" government and the services they "offer" [puke] at the end of a barrel of a gun.

Now unalienable rights come from God, the most any government can do is "grant privileges" and privileges as we have all seen come and go with the mood and entitlements.

Unalienable rights are rights that no man or government can strip you of under any circumstances.

Which begs the question; How can an atheist have anything more than 2nd class "civil" rights, which are in fact government granted privileges?

So since unalienable rights originate from God, and atheists do not believe in God......  see where this goes?

I see the rulings as balancing the scales and providing remedy where remedy did not exist, of course that was not the purpose but it is the end game.




HeatherMcLeather -> RE: Court Rules: Atheism is a Religion (10/15/2011 9:34:07 AM)

quote:

And i think it's quite a stretch to say that atheism is a religion.
And I don't, I think it is perfectly obvious that it can be considered a religion. So to my way of thinking, it fits perfectly within the parameters in the 1st Amendment as written. I don't see any stretching of the wording here, in fact, to deny atheism said protection would be interpreting the wording beyond its meaning in my eyes. Nothing said on this thread has in any way altered my opinion or legitimately challenged my original premise, so as far I am concerned, it still stands.




SpanishMatMaster -> RE: Court Rules: Atheism is a Religion (10/15/2011 9:42:57 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel
Last time I had a thread on atheism it went 50 pages without any resolution as to the definition of atheism.
That's the reason I stick with the Oxford, even if I do not like it much. It is clear, pretty standard (at least for British English) and online.
Better a bad definition than no definition, IMHO.




HeatherMcLeather -> RE: Court Rules: Atheism is a Religion (10/15/2011 9:57:38 AM)

quote:

That's the reason I stick with the Oxford
No, you stick with it because it fits your argument. Try these.
Merriam-Webster:
quote:

2: a: a disbelief in the existence of deity. b: the doctrine that there is no deity
Dictionary.com:
quote:

1. the doctrine or belief that there is no God.
thefreedictionary.com:
quote:

1. Disbelief in or denial of the existence of God or gods.
2. The doctrine that there is no God or gods.
Cambridge Dictionary:
quote:

someone who believes that God or gods do not exist
Webster-dictionary.com <I think its a copy of the 1913 edition>:
quote:

1. The disbelief or denial of the existence of a God, or supreme intelligent Being.
Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English Online:
quote:

the belief that God does not exist
yourdictionary.com:
quote:

the belief that there is no God, or denial that God or gods exist


I could go on, but as you can see, there are a multitude of online dictionaries that define the word in such a way that your argument simply doesn't hold water.

Also, please note the appearance of the word "doctrine" in these definitions, a word that has been used to differentiate between religion and other philosophies




SuzeCheri -> RE: Court Rules: Atheism is a Religion (10/15/2011 10:02:29 AM)

Quoted so SMM will see it, because, as far as I know he hasn't hidden this account yet. [:D]
quote:

ORIGINAL: HeatherMcLeather

quote:

That's the reason I stick with the Oxford
No, you stick with it because it fits your argument. Try these.
Merriam-Webster:
quote:

2: a: a disbelief in the existence of deity. b: the doctrine that there is no deity
Dictionary.com:
quote:

1. the doctrine or belief that there is no God.
thefreedictionary.com:
quote:

1. Disbelief in or denial of the existence of God or gods.
2. The doctrine that there is no God or gods.
Cambridge Dictionary:
quote:

someone who believes that God or gods do not exist
Webster-dictionary.com <I think its a copy of the 1913 edition>:
quote:

1. The disbelief or denial of the existence of a God, or supreme intelligent Being.
Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English Online:
quote:

the belief that God does not exist
yourdictionary.com:
quote:

the belief that there is no God, or denial that God or gods exist


I could go on, but as you can see, there are a multitude of online dictionaries that define the word in such a way that your argument simply doesn't hold water.

Also, please note the appearance of the word "doctrine" in these definitions, a word that has been used to differentiate between religion and other philosophies






GotSteel -> RE: Court Rules: Atheism is a Religion (10/15/2011 10:04:08 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: HeatherMcLeather
And I don't, I think it is perfectly obvious that it can be considered a religion. So to my way of thinking, it fits perfectly within the parameters in the 1st Amendment as written. I don't see any stretching of the wording here, in fact, to deny atheism said protection would be interpreting the wording beyond its meaning in my eyes. Nothing said on this thread has in any way altered my opinion or legitimately challenged my original premise, so as far I am concerned, it still stands.


As far as I can tell in reading the ruling the court doesn't seem to agree that it's a religion. This is one of those cases of a news article going for sensationalism over accuracy. They seem to refer to it as nonreligion.....well maybe it would be easier to just quote another section:

"The Establishment Clause itself says only that
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment
of religion,” but the Court understands the reference to
religion to include what it often calls “nonreligion.” In
McCreary County, it described the touchstone of
Establishment Clause analysis as “the principle that the
First Amendment mandates government neutrality between
religion and religion, and between religion and nonreligion.”"

Really, the ruling is an interesting read and not at all like the op's article presented it as. I'd encourage those of us in this discussion to give it a look.




tazzygirl -> RE: Court Rules: Atheism is a Religion (10/15/2011 10:05:04 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarthVaderOfLove
I guess what should first be determined is what constitutes a religion.


Yeah....I've got to agree with Spanish on this one. Last time I had a thread on atheism it went 50 pages without any resolution as to the definition of atheism. Not only would you have to get that solved, you also need to get a consensus of what religion and belief are to get anywhere in the squabble here. [sm=banghead.gif]



Guess what GS, not an argument between us yet and its been how many days? [:D]

But I am going to ask you a question... however, if you feel its better for its own thread, do let me know.

What is an atheist vs an agnostic? And a follow up. What is the difference between a hard atheist, a "regular" atheist (if that term is appropriate) and a soft atheist as someone else has suggested?








Page: <<   < prev  17 18 [19] 20 21   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875