Romney's Inconvenient Truth (or is it just the pants?) (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


SternSkipper -> Romney's Inconvenient Truth (or is it just the pants?) (10/12/2011 4:42:16 PM)

Here's the Inconvenient Truth from the 'anointed' Future Cult Leader of the Free World (if you believe the culture of corporate liars trying to shove him down america's throat)

WHAT THE FUCK IS UP WITH THE PANTS... And they were on Obama as "urkell"

[image]local://upfiles/18637/AA20AB0C93C04149B45ABE910F8F70A7.jpg[/image]

Okay, so what I want to know is this... Many of you right wingers have in THE EVERY RECENT PAST BEEN ALL OVER ANYONE WHO EVEN MENTION GLOBAL WARMING AS A MAN-MADE TREND (And I want to say right here and now, I give KY a walk on this one cause he is a Cain Man and he has made his point of view known and done his best to present some science supporting his point of view)... But I want to know how you can justify this knowing in advance that this as ANY IDIOT KNOWS WILL BE A BIG ISSUE POST ELECTION ... IT WON'T GO AWAY, AND HE WILL HAVE TO TAKE ACTION... So how are you going to deal with his GOREAN HYPOCRACY?




Lucylastic -> RE: Romney's Inconvenient Truth (or is it just the pants?) (10/12/2011 4:43:51 PM)

he looks like hes hatching a diamond




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Romney's Inconvenient Truth (or is it just the pants?) (10/12/2011 4:51:39 PM)

He said the same thing he's been saying for years...he doesnt know how much emissions contribute to it. As a result he focuses on whats important:

"I am uncertain how much of the warming, however, is attributable to man and how much is attributable to factors out of our control. I do not support radical feel-good policies like a unilateral U.S. cap-and-trade mandate. Such policies would have little effect on climate but could cripple economic growth with devastating results for people across the planet."




mnottertail -> RE: Romney's Inconvenient Truth (or is it just the pants?) (10/12/2011 4:54:29 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

He said the same thing he's been saying for years...he doesnt know how much emissions contribute to it. As a result he focuses on whats important:

"I am uncertain how much of the warming, however, is attributable to man and how much is attributable to factors out of our control. I do not support radical feel-good policies like a unilateral U.S. cap-and-trade mandate. Such policies would have little effect on climate but could cripple economic growth with devastating results for people across the planet."



You think that after years of not fucking knowing, he might think that he would be asked the question and at least fuckin lie.....

No, ignorant, and proud of it. might would could should.....

I DON'T know, I don't KNOW!!!!




SternSkipper -> RE: Romney's Inconvenient Truth (or is it just the pants?) (10/12/2011 5:02:57 PM)

quote:

He said the same thing he's been saying for years...he doesnt know how much emissions contribute to it. As a result he focuses on whats important:

"I am uncertain how much of the warming, however, is attributable to man and how much is attributable to factors out of our control. I do not support radical feel-good policies like a unilateral U.S. cap-and-trade mandate. Such policies would have little effect on climate but could cripple economic growth with devastating results for people across the planet."


Hush, Ya Zany Cultist, I wasn't finished ... wanted the picture in the correct place
You're Romney Apologist Act won't wash

Edited to be more polite cause I don't want to find beheaded chickens on my doorstep[:)]




SternSkipper -> RE: Romney's Inconvenient Truth (or is it just the pants?) (10/12/2011 5:12:22 PM)

quote:

You think that after years of not fucking knowing, he might think that he would be asked the question and at least fuckin lie.....


He knows... the quoted statement is brainwashing ...
Bain Capital Might Be a lot of things, but one thing they are not is a company run by guys "who just know what they've read" and this is no exception




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Romney's Inconvenient Truth (or is it just the pants?) (10/12/2011 5:13:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:

He said the same thing he's been saying for years...he doesnt know how much emissions contribute to it. As a result he focuses on whats important:

"I am uncertain how much of the warming, however, is attributable to man and how much is attributable to factors out of our control. I do not support radical feel-good policies like a unilateral U.S. cap-and-trade mandate. Such policies would have little effect on climate but could cripple economic growth with devastating results for people across the planet."


Shut the fuck up, I wasn't finished ... wanted the picture in the correct place
You're Romney Apologist Act won't wash




Im not an apologist since theres nothing to apologize for. Unlike the "Urkell" in the White House.




SternSkipper -> RE: Romney's Inconvenient Truth (or is it just the pants?) (10/12/2011 5:17:44 PM)

quote:


Shut the fuck up, I wasn't finished ... wanted the picture in the correct place
You're Romney Apologist Act won't wash


Im not an apologist since theres nothing to apologize for. Unlike the "Urkell" in the White House.


I am sorry I told you to shut the fuck up. That was rude and I took measures to correct it as I sensed it might be offe3nsive.
   And I apologize for the error in terminology by referring to you as an 'apologist' ... the correct term is PRE-APOLOGIST [:)]




SternSkipper -> RE: Romney's Inconvenient Truth (or is it just the pants?) (10/12/2011 5:18:46 PM)

Who's Romney's Speaking Coach anyway? Porky Pig?





willbeurdaddy -> RE: Romney's Inconvenient Truth (or is it just the pants?) (10/12/2011 5:35:18 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

Who's Romney's Speaking Coach anyway? Porky Pig?





Not coached by a corpse-man, at least, like someone else we know apparently was.

And btw, I just got an answer to a question I posed to a Haitian friend (and flaming liberal) of 35 years...he says your friend is living in the dark ages if he's offended by "zombie".




farglebargle -> RE: Romney's Inconvenient Truth (or is it just the pants?) (10/12/2011 6:06:11 PM)

Those are Romney's Magic Pants to go with his Mormon(TM) Magic Underpants(MP)




Owner59 -> RE: Romney's Inconvenient Truth (or is it just the pants?) (10/12/2011 6:11:24 PM)

Wow,pro science......

What a refreshing change from the rest.

Bad pants tho,bad bad pants......[:D]




Lucylastic -> RE: Romney's Inconvenient Truth (or is it just the pants?) (10/12/2011 6:25:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Those are Romney's Magic Pants to go with his Mormon(TM) Magic Underpants(MP)

theres a visual I wont be able to bleach out very easily




SternSkipper -> RE: Romney's Inconvenient Truth (or is it just the pants?) (10/12/2011 7:48:51 PM)

quote:

Those are Romney's Magic Pants to go with his Mormon(TM) Magic Underpants(MP)


Don't tell Me... "Mitt Romney, The Candidate You Can Depends<tm> On"

My new response to Romney Supports "Don't get your Depends all full on us"
or "Love the Diaper Act you're pulling":

This needs out on the wires....





SternSkipper -> RE: Romney's Inconvenient Truth (or is it just the pants?) (10/12/2011 7:55:39 PM)

quote:

And btw, I just got an answer to a question I posed to a Haitian friend (and flaming liberal) of 35 years...he says your friend is living in the dark ages if he's offended by "zombie".


While you're changing into your next round of Romney pee pants, allow me to clarify. My friend, who lives in The South Beach Area of Miami, is about the same age and married to one of Ford's hottest models, was referring to a guy that is Belafonte's AGE ... which in case you haven't noticed, is out of the Dark ages... so it was a fucking racial slur ... ain't gettin any smarter with age, you just need to call more people... lemme know when ya start needing help with the remote like the other GOP Geezers





SternSkipper -> RE: Romney's Inconvenient Truth (or is it just the pants?) (10/12/2011 8:18:49 PM)

Here's another Inconvenient Truth... Wasn't only last week that THE WALL STREET CANDIDATE aka CULT LEADER said "The 99% " aka OWS were breaking the law and should be stopped. and was spewing that shit last night too, wasn't he?
But Here he is on another day:Romney Flip-Flops On Wall Street Protests: ‘I Worry About The 99 Percent’ By Pat Garofalo on Oct 11, 2011 at 9:35 am [image]http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/romney1003.jpg[/image]Republicans have had little but contempt for the ongoing protests on Wall Street and around the nation. House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) called the protesters a “mob,” Herman Cain said they’re “un-American,” and Rep. Spencer “serve the banks” Bachus (R-AL) believes that the protests are “misdirected” and instead should be aimed at “job-killing regulations.” The conservative media have also done their part to dismiss the protesters as “freaks” who are “aligned with Lenin.”
However, some Republicans are a tad more wishy-washy. 2012 presidential hopeful Rick Santorum called the protesters a “fringe group” when he appeared on CNBC, but later said, “I understand the motivation behind the protests.” GOP frontrunner Mitt Romney, meanwhile, at first said that the protests are “dangerous.” But during a town hall in New Hampshire yesterday, he seized upon the protesters call for an economy that works for everybody, saying, “I worry about the 99 percent,” and added, “I understand how those people feel”:
I don’t worry about the top one percent. I don’t stay up nights worrying about ‘gee we need to help them.’ I don’t worry about that. They’re doing just fine by themselves. I worry about the 99 percent in America. I want America, once again, to be the best place in the world to be middle-class. I want to have a strong and vibrant and prosperous middle-class. And so I look at what’s happening on Wall Street and my own view is, boy I understand how those people feel…The people in this country are upset.

http://youtu.be/LRfTvbYbTW4
Watch it: Earlier that very day, Romney criticized the protesters, saying, “all the streets are connected — Wall Street’s connected to Main Street — and so finding a scapegoat, finding someone to blame, in my opinion, isn’t the right way to go.” Romney didn’t explain how the protesters went so quickly from a “dangerous” group to such sympathetic figures. He also delivered both sets of remarks while joined by former Sen. Judd Gregg (R-NH), who is now working as an adviser for mega-bank Goldman Sachs.

OH and Get this ... As of today, Eric Canter Practically wants to meet the 99%ers in a giant restroom somewhere

Well
Gollllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll-E




SternSkipper -> RE: Romney's Inconvenient Truth (or is it just the pants?) (10/12/2011 8:33:42 PM)

I Know of NOWHERE This BEHAVIOR ISN'T CALLED BEING A MOTHER-FUCKING LIAR
Mitt Romney, Judd Gregg: Leave Wall Street Alone Grace Wyler | Oct. 10, 2011, 11:30 PM |

Mitt Romney wasted no time defending Wall Street today, coming out strongly against the growing Occupy Wall Street movement. Responding to his first question at a town hall in Milford, New Hampshire, Romney slammed the protesters as looking for "scapegoats" for their economic problems. "All the streets are connected — Wall Street's connected to Main Street — and so finding a scapegoat, finding someone to blame, in my opinion, isn't the right way to go," Romney said. "Don't attack a whole class of Americans, whether they're rich or poor, white or black. This isn't the time for divisiveness." Although Romney wouldn't elaborate to reporters, the former Bain CEO got some back up from his newest endorser, former New Hampshire Sen. Judd Gregg, now an international advisor for Goldman Sachs. Gregg, who accompanied Romney on his New Hampshire barnstorming tour today, told Business Insider that the protests are "misguided." "America's capacity to be prosperous is because an individual on Main Street who is entrepreneurial and who is willing to take a risk, that person has access to capital and credit at a reasonable price — and that's because of the financial system," Gregg said. "It's complicated but it works reasonably well. It's really the job creation engine of our country. I don't think they understand that."
Muddah Fuckah Sanity! Look At THAT Judd Gregg rather significant GOP figure shadowing Romney to give him support WHO IS THAT THEY'RE SAYING HE'S WITH???????? OMG!!!!!
But Wait Let's Consult Someone The GOP BS Artists have been expressing confidence in during this whole event... Officer where is it these folks are going with their attempts to Co-Opt the Protestors in NYC and Boston, and ALL THOSE OTHER CITIES?
[image]local://upfiles/18637/BD9E7609A71C41CC98BBBC3092357FAC.jpg[/image]




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875