Termyn8or -> Civilisation (10/19/2011 10:34:22 PM)
|
He killed her so I killed him so now they are going to kill me. Think now, he killed her. Why ? do we care, is there no reason to take a human life ever ? If so explain war. Well I killed him because he killed her. He did not have good reason to kill her, in my opinion, she was my <insert whatever here>. Nothing she could've done would warrant death, but it did in his opinion. No matter what it was in my opinion it did not warrant death so therefore that warrants his death. There is no remorse and if he was alive I wouldn't be awaiting death, but if this situation was not so I would kill him anyway. I would do it again, without remorse becasue he should die for killing her. I am not sorry, not one bit. If I had to do it over again I would try to do better at not getting caught. So now they are going to kill me. They are going to kill me because I believe it is OK to kill someone for killing someone when it wasn't warranted IN MY OPINION. So their OPINION is that I should die. I am not talking about any type of wrongful accusation here. There is no doubt that he killed her and I did not forgive him, rather I avenged her death. They who are going to kill me know and acknowledge that even though they are going to kill me for exactly the same reason. They will not forgive me because I did not forgive him. In an organised society (we are still checking on that) you can be safe walking down the street. Those who would attack are removed from society. We can warehouse them or kill them. Is it anyone's right to prevent us from doing what is actually right and natural ? They hung horse theives, and I heard there was a death penalty for auto theft for a few years in Chicago, but I'm not sure, check with snopes. But then there is another school of thought, the death penalty is wrong, OH OH OH, except for McVeigh, Asswadwipe or whatever, BinLaden and a few others. Those death penalties are OK, apparently because they killed more people. Oh but wait, Eichman got a trial....... do you think an expression of remorse would have saved him ? But then they killed people 2,000+ miles away you never heard of before. But someone kills your best friend, your sibling or Parent. The person who killed a bunch of people 2,000 miles away deserves to die but this creep does not. Is that the way it works ? I just wanted to start a good ole CM style dog draggin' smackdown argument in which we don't have to insult each other. I think we should be alright as long as it's agreed that all death threats are in jest. I think. But the point is, we live by death. Men had gunfights in the past and intended to kill each other. There was no mamby pamby bullshit about how precious life was, Mine was more important than his. That was all that mattered. Do we live in a world devoid of threat ? T^T
|
|
|
|