RE: The Lover and the Beloved

RE: The Lover and the Beloved (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

pinkee -> RE: The Lover and the Beloved (5/29/2006 8:18:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: feastie For one to be Beloved and the other to be Lover, would imply that one loves and receives no love, one receives but offers no love. A dismal thought at best. Not at all feastie. Both love and are loved in return....but the Lover pursues the Beloved. That is why i thought the Doms and Masters would be the Lovers. pinkee

feastie -> RE: The Lover and the Beloved (5/29/2006 9:37:02 PM)
Main Entry: be·loved [image]http://www.m-w.com/images/audio.gif[/image] [image]http://www.m-w.com/images/audio.gif[/image] Pronunciation: bi-'l&vd, -'l&-v&d Function: adjective Etymology: Middle English, from past participle of beloven to love, from be- + loven to love : dearly loved : dear to the heart - beloved noun *1 a : a person in love; especially* : a man in love with a woman** b plural : two persons in love with each other 2 : an affectionate or benevolent friend 3 : DEVOTEE 4 a : PARAMOUR b : a person with whom one has sexual relations We all know that love is often one-sided and that some dominants do not feel the need to love their submissive, but that their submissive should love them. Personally, I prefer to each to be both Lover and Beloved.

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

1.367188E-02