|
erieangel -> RE: Major win for Occupy Cleveland (10/27/2011 7:56:13 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SternSkipper
quote:
The attorneys argued that the city ordinance interfered with their First Amendment rights. The city decided to settle without a court deciding the matter (did the city feel they would lose the fight?) and the occupiers are permitted to stay.
Erie..... If you find any articles with any decent details ... particularly the attorney's name, I would really love to see you post it ... or you can PM it to me. I was in a GA where there may be some application... lot's more attempted evictions are coming and the permit or suing for permit is being looked at.
http://www.newsmax.com/TheWire/occupy-protests-cleveland/2011/10/27/id/415860
There you go Stern, but no names as of yet, still waiting to get them. I do remember the law offices are supposedly right across the street from the occupation site.
|
|
|
|
