tazzygirl
Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007 Status: offline
|
http://content.clearchannel.com/cc-common/mlib/3359/10/3359_1319803260.pdf Referring to this, Firm, in part of course. This is the part that, apparently, should have us all concerned... "Pick any example of abuse of power, whether it is the fascist 'war on drugs,' the police thuggery that has become so common, the random stops and searches now routinely carried out in the name of 'security' (e.g., at airports, 'border checkpoints' that aren't even at the border, 'sobriety checkpoints,' and so on), or anything else. Now ask yourself the uncomfortable question: If it is wrong for cops to do these things, doesn't that imply that the people have a right to RESIST such actions? Of course, state mercenaries don't take kindly to being resisted, even non-violently. If you question their right to detain you, interrogate you, search you, invade your home, and so on, you are very likely to be tasered, physically assaulted, kidnapped, put in a cage, or shot. If a cop decides to treat you like livestock, whether he does it 'legally' or not, you will usually have only two options: submit, or kill the cop. You can't resist a cop 'just a little' and get away with it. He will always call in more of his fellow gang members, until you are subdued or dead. "Basic logic dictates that you either have an obligation to LET 'law enforcers' have their way with you, or you have the right to STOP them from doing so, which will almost always require killing them. (Politely asking fascists not to be fascists has a very poor track record.)" But, of course, something is missing from that paragraph.
< Message edited by tazzygirl -- 10/29/2011 7:50:49 PM >
_____________________________
Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt. RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11 Duchess of Dissent 1 Dont judge me because I sin differently than you. If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.
|