Sherrr -> RE: Obedience Training (10/30/2011 11:36:44 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: lthrpup Canine training comes to mind immediately... collar and leash, verbal commands, swats with a crop to direct and indicate failure. Love it! That kind of obedience training is perhaps my favorite kind, though I prefer to think of it more as "canine-style." The difference is that we don't need to be literally pretending he's a dog - just treating him like one. quote:
ORIGINAL: lthrpup Obedience training, in a general sense, would mean some activity under the direction of a dominant who would provide feedback, punishment or reward. In addition to the leathery things that come to mind, various domestic service or other chores could fulfill the purpose if orders are given and the submissive's performance is evaluated. It could be any activity that requires some protocol or specific way of doing things that can be critiqued and corrected. The purpose--other than fun--is to condition the subject to obey. Also well said. It is true that desiring to obey, as a submissive does, doesn't necessarily translate to being good at obedience. quote:
ORIGINAL: lthrpup Humiliation can serve the same purpose of conditioning a sub to embrace their role and perform well but it is not the same as obedience training. Humility is a condition a sub accepts, obedience is something the sub has to perform. Both humiliation and training contribute to the same purpose of getting the sub's mind right, but they require different reactions and behavior from the sub. What differences in reactions and behavior do you mean?
|
|
|
|