Cain campaign’s newest argument - Accuser so ugly, Cain wouldn't have harassed her

Cain campaign’s newest argument - Accuser so ugly, Cain wouldn't have harassed her (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Fightdirecto -> Cain campaign’s newest argument - Accuser so ugly, Cain wouldn't have harassed her (11/9/2011 2:33:01 PM)
Herman Cain Accuser Karen Kraushaar - she’s ugly quote: Ew, gross! Who the hell does this ugly bitch think she’s fooling? Just to be clear, Karen Kraushaar is the one on the left. They then posted a picture of a woman standing next to a horse. Reminds me of a rape case I heard of years ago. The defendant said, in his own defense while under oath, that the ugliness of the rape victim was proof he couldn't have done it... BTW: The jury didn't buy his argument, and convicted him... [image]local://upfiles/42188/2D4DD41BDA8E4C46A2345ED94A67C2B3.jpg[/image]

Lucylastic -> RE: Cain campiagin's newest argument - Accuser so ugly, Cain wouldn't have harassed her (11/9/2011 2:36:17 PM)
oh Im sorry if shes ugly it means he is innocent... yeah cant have a presidential nominee big man having the bad taste to hit on a "dog" now can we. This is a highschool response from his PAC???? they really arent doing very well at making him look wronged are they!!!

Lucylastic -> RE: Cain campiagin's newest argument - Accuser so ugly, Cain wouldn't have harassed her (11/9/2011 2:41:37 PM)
ok open letter to MR Cain, for gods sake doood, get rid of your "friends" between block and this MP chap with your"PAC"(hah) they are doing more harm than good http://hermancainpac.com/author/mp/ what a mental midget

Fightdirecto -> RE: Cain campiagin's newest argument - Accuser so ugly, Cain wouldn't have harassed her (11/9/2011 2:44:48 PM)
I may be painting a target on myself, but, based strictly on her picture, she's more attractive than some of the women who have profiles here on CollarMe.

slvemike4u -> RE: Cain campiagin's newest argument - Accuser so ugly, Cain wouldn't have harassed her (11/9/2011 2:44:51 PM)
They aren't pros...which I know is one of the things that makes him appealing to some....but it is one thing not to be pros...it's another not being professional [8\|]

Lucylastic -> RE: Cain campiagin's newest argument - Accuser so ugly, Cain wouldn't have harassed her (11/9/2011 2:55:14 PM)
: The Cain campaign is now responding to critics regarding their Kraushaar cock-up. Via TPM: “Based upon information available at the time of Mr. Block’s Tuesday night interview on Fox News, the campaign was led to believe that Mr. Josh Kraushaar, currently with the National Journal and a former employee of Politico, was the son of Karen Kraushaar,” campaign spokesman J.D. Gordon said. “We have since learned that is not the case.” But what on earth is Gordon referring to when he says, "based on information available at the time?" There was no information available at the time. There was, at no time, "information" that suggested that Josh Kraushaar was the son of Karen Kraushaar. The Cain campaign, in making that allegation, was operating with the absence of information. They threw some junk at the wall, hoped it would stick, it didn't, the end.

Lucylastic -> RE: Cain campiagin's newest argument - Accuser so ugly, Cain wouldn't have harassed her (11/9/2011 3:00:29 PM)
http://lawsonzepeda.blogspot.com/2011/11/herman-cain-is-this-gal-you-say-you.html?zx=ec527a1fa6b604f

LillyBoPeep -> RE: Cain campiagin's newest argument - Accuser so ugly, Cain wouldn't have harassed her (11/9/2011 3:26:59 PM)
among the comments, at least "Jeni White" has a few active brain cells... quote: Jeni White says: November 8, 2011 at 9:31 pm Guys? I’m mad about the wild accusations too. But this kind of puerile stuff on a Web site that looks like it’s part of Herman’s official message will not help his image. Not a good call imho.

Lucylastic -> RE: Cain campiagin's newest argument - Accuser so ugly, Cain wouldn't have harassed her (11/9/2011 3:32:47 PM)
theres anotherone called MoFo Politics using the same crap

SternSkipper -> RE: Cain campaign’s newest argument - Accuser so ugly, Cain wouldn't have harassed her (11/9/2011 6:29:10 PM)
quote: They then posted a picture of a woman standing next to a horse. Reminds me of a rape case I heard of years ago. The defendant said, in his own defense while under oath, that the ugliness of the rape victim was proof he couldn't have done it... BTW: The jury didn't buy his argument, and convicted him... Lemme guess ... 3 flavors of DNA from a rape kit kinda negated his 'brilliant' defense[:D]

SternSkipper -> RE: Cain campiagin's newest argument - Accuser so ugly, Cain wouldn't have harassed her (11/9/2011 6:30:36 PM)
quote: I may be painting a target on myself, but, based strictly on her picture, she's more attractive than some of the women who have profiles here on CollarMe. Just don't go registering republican and putting on your rape jumpsuit[:D]

SternSkipper -> RE: Cain campiagin's newest argument - Accuser so ugly, Cain wouldn't have harassed her (11/9/2011 6:33:36 PM)
quote: oh Im sorry if shes ugly it means he is innocent... yeah cant have a presidential nominee big man having the bad taste to hit on a "dog" now can we. This is a highschool response from his PAC???? they really arent doing very well at making him look wronged are they!!! You think that's fucked up? Check THIS out

FirmhandKY -> RE: Cain campaign’s newest argument - Accuser so ugly, Cain wouldn't have harassed her (11/9/2011 7:06:44 PM)
It does not appear that the website is maintained or owned by the Herman Cain campaign. Registrant: Domains by Proxy, Inc. DomainsByProxy.com 15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353 Scottsdale, Arizona 85260 United States Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com) Domain Name: HERMANCAINPAC.COM Created on: 08-May-11 Expires on: 08-May-13 Last Updated on: 28-May-11 Administrative Contact: Private, Registration [email protected] Domains by Proxy, Inc. DomainsByProxy.com 15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353 Scottsdale, Arizona 85260 United States (480) 624-2599 Fax -- (480) 624-2598 Technical Contact: Private, Registration [email protected] Domains by Proxy, Inc. DomainsByProxy.com 15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353 Scottsdale, Arizona 85260 United States (480) 624-2599 Fax -- (480) 624-2598 Domain servers in listed order: NS1.UNITEDCONSERVATIVEAMERICANETWORK.COM NS2.UNITEDCONSERVATIVEAMERICANETWORK.COM NS3.UNITEDCONSERVATIVEAMERICANETWORK.COM Registry Status: clientDeleteProhibited Registry Status: clientRenewProhibited Registry Status: clientTransferProhibited Registry Status: clientUpdateProhibited Oh, yeah ... this might help you sort through it all: Wed Nov 09, 2011 at 12:43 PM PST Herman Cain PAC Did Not Call Karen Kraushaar "an ugly bitch": The website is a lie. There's a sucker born every minute, and the easiest to sucker are the ideologues. Firm

Lucylastic -> RE: Cain campaign’s newest argument - Accuser so ugly, Cain wouldn't have harassed her (11/9/2011 7:11:52 PM)
LMAO an obvious plot by obama !!!

Lucylastic -> RE: Cain campaign’s newest argument - Accuser so ugly, Cain wouldn't have harassed her (11/9/2011 7:17:41 PM)
now FIrm Post three:) ok open letter to MR Cain, for gods sake doood, get rid of your "friends" between block and this MP chap with your"PAC"(hah) they are doing more harm than good http://hermancainpac.com/author/mp/ what a mental midget I wasnt into finding facts as much as reading the most vile racist murderous threats.. I got more than a little fed up with so many stupid people AND I just sat in a room watching the debate with for the last hour and a half I should NOT have picked a room of rabid crazy racists and libertarians There isnt enough mind bleach to rid myself of the stench of hate

Owner59 -> RE: Cain campaign’s newest argument - Accuser so ugly, Cain wouldn't have harassed her (11/9/2011 7:20:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Fightdirecto Herman Cain Accuser Karen Kraushaar - she’s ugly quote: Ew, gross! Who the hell does this ugly bitch think she’s fooling? Just to be clear, Karen Kraushaar is the one on the left. They then posted a picture of a woman standing next to a horse. Reminds me of a rape case I heard of years ago. The defendant said, in his own defense while under oath, that the ugliness of the rape victim was proof he couldn't have done it... BTW: The jury didn't buy his argument, and convicted him... [image]local://upfiles/42188/2D4DD41BDA8E4C46A2345ED94A67C2B3.jpg[/image] She`s not ugly. I like her smile and glow. Shame on them.

FirmhandKY -> RE: Cain campaign’s newest argument - Accuser so ugly, Cain wouldn't have harassed her (11/9/2011 7:23:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 Shame on them. ahhh ... Owner ... you do realize that even Daily Kos says the site is a fake, don't you? [8D] Firm

Owner59 -> RE: Cain campaign’s newest argument - Accuser so ugly, Cain wouldn't have harassed her (11/9/2011 7:24:36 PM)
Not till now. This is true?

Owner59 -> RE: Cain campaign’s newest argument - Accuser so ugly, Cain wouldn't have harassed her (11/9/2011 7:31:12 PM)
The site has archives going back almost a year and seems like a normal pro-Cain site.Nothing over the top or extreme. But now, its a fake site? All set-up in advance,...in anticipation of these events,a year ago? [8\|]

SternSkipper -> RE: Cain campaign’s newest argument - Accuser so ugly, Cain wouldn't have harassed her (11/9/2011 11:06:14 PM)
Has anyone looked at their site? http://unitedconservativeamericanetwork.com/?page_id=2 They're not flying legal though. They don't identify properly through their contacts page. But that's not the first time I have seen a right wing site do that. I think it's VERY odd they identify over and over as conservatives/rahrah red-white&blue and yet they don't point back to the RNC page. If they were a lefty scam, every other link would be back to the RNC to create a breadcrumb trail. So I get curious and decide to trace the headwaters of their money trail ... Seems this company (also cryptically laid out, though less so since they want you to actually donate): © 2011 Donor Town Square, Inc. All Rights Reserved P.O. Box 156, Crozet, VA 22932 \| (P) 434-207-8310 \| (F) 866-744-6588 Privacy Policy/Terms of Use So now, we're off to the VA Election Board to have a look there.... James Curtis is our money boy.... PAC2110001 Donor Town Square Inc. PO Box 156 - Crozet - VA - 22311 Credit card processing James Curtis 3/14/2011 2.5 PAC2110001 US Postal Service 475 LEnfant Plaza - Washington - DC - 20260 Postage James Curtis 3/15/2011 3.68 So anyway, this James Curtis is something of an illusive dude. And that POB @ 475 L'Enfant Plaza ... that is a dirty building in terms of who uses that PO. That's all I'm gfonna type on the matter... but I started poking around in Crozet and a find a really small breadcrumb (trade secret) and it tells me where to look ... and lo and behold (charlottesville is a stones throw from Crozet and there is no way in my mind anyone would create this convoluted a cover... so I think this shows you your smoking gun..... Libertarian Party of Virginia Pg 1 of 24 State Central Committee meeting- June 5, 2004 (1:30PM) Doubletree Hotel-Monroe Room, Charlottesville VA AGENDA: I. Call to Order II. Approval of Agenda III. Approval of Minutes IV. Old Business Recognition of Local Affiliates (if any) Committee Appointments (if any) Change in Policy-Use of LPVA Member Data Endorsement of PWCLP Actions (withdrawn) Motion foregoing Ballot Drive (withdrawn) CD Org Bylaws Amendment Convention Fund Reclassification Bylaws change re Asset Management Bylaws change re Candidacies V. New Business Presentation on Presidential election-Steve LaBianca Discussion item re tactics V. Adjournment List of Voting Attendees: Chair -Steve Damerell Vice Chair -Leonard Harris Secretary -Charlotte Patrick Treasurer -Kevin McKenna 1CD -Kathy Mullin 2CD -Brian Babb 3CD -Tommy Blanton 4CD -Jeff Bowles, as proxy for Steve Merrill 5CD -James Curtis 6CD -Marc Montoni 7CD -George Marchenko 8CD -Beth Homicz 9CD -James W Lark III 10CD -not present 11CD -Kenneth Morrison Other attendees: Dwight Baker, Jim Turbett, Liz Bowles, Richard Bennett, Shaun Whelden, Steve LaBianca Minutes: Approval of agenda: Dr. Lark moved to revise the agenda to allow five minutes at the beginning of new business for a presentation from Mr. LaBianca regarding the upcoming Presidential election. The motion passed w/out objection. Mr. Morrison moved to delete the motions regarding endorsement of PWC actions and to forego ballot drive. The motion passed w/out objection. Mr. Montoni moved to change the order of business; moving the CD Bylaws Amendment, the Convention Fund Reclassification motion, and the Bylaws changes regarding Asset Management to old business. The motion passed w/out objection. Mr. Montoni then moved to withdraw the Bylaws change regarding alternates. The motion passed w/out objection. There being no further agenda changes, the agenda as revised was adopted w/out objection. Approval of minutes: The minutes from the 3/27/04 SCC meeting were approved as corrected, w/out objection. The Secretary noted that SCC could not technically approve the convention minutes, but asked that any corrections be brought to her attention. Mr. McKenna noted that the motions adopted did not include the text. The Secretary agreed to include the items if submitted. No other changes were noted. The Secretary moved to suspend rules to allow a five minute discussion of the Treasurer's Report. The motion was approved w/out objection. Mr. McKenna then noted that he had filed for State party status Hmmmmmmm ... Libertarians????? Interesting.

Page: [1] 2 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875