Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Congress of Catholic Bishops


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Congress of Catholic Bishops Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Congress of Catholic Bishops - 11/17/2011 10:08:03 AM   
Iamsemisweet


Posts: 3651
Joined: 4/9/2011
From: The Great Northwest, USA
Status: offline
Regardless of how one feels about abortion, I would think it would make anyone queasy that a religious organization, tax exempt and not allowed to influence legislation, has such a profound influences over reproductive laws in this country.

A group of men with no real background in law or medicine, but blessed with a strong personal interest in women’s bodies, have quietly influenced all of the major anti-abortion legislation over the past several years. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops may be one of the quietest, yet most powerful lobbies on Capitol Hill, with political allies that have enabled them to roll back decades of law and precedent.Over the past two years the GOP-controlled House of Representatives has launched one of the most extreme assaults on women's choice the U.S. has seen in decades. Republicans voted twice to slash federal family planning funds for low-income women, moved to prevent women from using their own money to buy insurance plans that cover abortion, introduced legislation that would force women to have ultrasounds before receiving an abortion and, most recently, passed a bill that will allow hospitals to refuse to perform emergency abortions for women with life-threatening pregnancy complications. But the erosion of women's rights didn't begin with the GOP takeover. President Barack Obama's health care reform law contained some of the most restrictive abortion language seen in decades.Lift the curtain, and behind the assault was the conference of bishops.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/01/the-men-behind-the-war-on_n_1069406.html

< Message edited by Iamsemisweet -- 11/17/2011 10:46:09 AM >


_____________________________

Alice: But I don't want to go among mad people.
The Cat: Oh, you can't help that. We're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad.
Alice: How do you know I'm mad?
The Cat: You must be. Or you wouldn't have come here.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Congress of Catholic Bishops - 11/17/2011 10:12:28 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Your link doesnt work. Got another?

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Iamsemisweet)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Congress of Catholic Bishops - 11/17/2011 10:14:23 AM   
FirstQuaker


Posts: 787
Joined: 3/19/2011
Status: offline
That band of Christian Mullahs have been trouble for over a thousand years.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Congress of Catholic Bishops - 11/17/2011 10:18:28 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
I found one!

I dont view not requiring insurance companies to cover abortions as being "the most restrictive abortion language seen in decades." Abortions are still legal... PP is still running... women are still entitled to see one out. Should insurance companies cover? Yes. And they are required to cover any difficulties resulting from complications of an abortion. But the fact that they dont, yet, cover them, I dont view as "restrictive".

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to FirstQuaker)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Congress of Catholic Bishops - 11/17/2011 10:44:07 AM   
Iamsemisweet


Posts: 3651
Joined: 4/9/2011
From: The Great Northwest, USA
Status: offline
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/01/the-men-behind-the-war-on_n_1069406.html

Sorry, don't know why the original link didn't work


< Message edited by Iamsemisweet -- 11/17/2011 10:45:00 AM >


_____________________________

Alice: But I don't want to go among mad people.
The Cat: Oh, you can't help that. We're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad.
Alice: How do you know I'm mad?
The Cat: You must be. Or you wouldn't have come here.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Congress of Catholic Bishops - 11/17/2011 11:24:55 AM   
Iamsemisweet


Posts: 3651
Joined: 4/9/2011
From: The Great Northwest, USA
Status: offline
I think what that language in the article refers to is the Stupak amendment, which was ultimately rejected.  That was the amendment that would have precluded coverage for abortion in health insurance plans bought as part of Obamacare.

The real issue is why is this religious, tax exempt organization being allowed to lobby so hard?
quote:


I dont view not requiring insurance companies to cover abortions as being "the most restrictive abortion language seen in decades." Abortions are still legal... PP is still running... women are still entitled to see one out. Should insurance companies cover? Yes. And they are required to cover any difficulties resulting from complications of an abortion. But the fact that they dont, yet, cover them, I dont view as "restrictive".


_____________________________

Alice: But I don't want to go among mad people.
The Cat: Oh, you can't help that. We're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad.
Alice: How do you know I'm mad?
The Cat: You must be. Or you wouldn't have come here.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Congress of Catholic Bishops - 11/17/2011 6:10:04 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

The real issue is why is this religious, tax exempt organization being allowed to lobby so hard?


Perhaps they have told the politicians how it was in the old days when they had everyone conned into believing that god spoke to them directly and you had to do what they said.

(in reply to Iamsemisweet)
Profile   Post #: 7
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Congress of Catholic Bishops Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078