Oregon Governor Halts all executions (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Iamsemisweet -> Oregon Governor Halts all executions (11/22/2011 3:40:44 PM)

SALEM -- Gov. John Kitzhaber announced today he will not allow the execution of Gary Haugen -- or any death row inmate -- to take place while he is in office.

The death penalty is morally wrong and unjustly administered, Kitzhaber said.

"In my mind it is a perversion of justice," he said at an emotional news conference in Salem.


The governor cited his constitutional authority to grant a temporary reprieve for Haugen, in effect canceling the planned Dec. 6 lethal injection of the twice-convicted murderer. Haugen waived his legal appeals and has been preparing for the execution, which would have been Oregon's first in 14 years.

The change of heart comes as a surprise for a governor who twice before -- in his first term as governor -- allowed executions to go forward. Despite his personal opposition to the death penalty, Kitzhaber said he was upholding the will of the people in allowing the 1996 execution of Douglas Franklin Wright and the 1997 execution of Harry Charles Moore.

"I have regretted those choices ever since," he said in a prepared statement. "Both because of my own deep personal convictions about capital punishment and also because in practice, Oregon has an expensive and unworkable system that fails to meet basic standards of justice."

The announcement is a win for death penalty activists who had asked Kitzhaber to declare a moratorium on executions until the state conducts a thorough review of its death penalty system.

Kitzhaber said his decision is not out of compassion for Haugen or other inmates. But the death penalty is not handed down fairly -- some inmates on death row have committed similar crimes as those who are serving life sentences, he said. It is a criticism Haugen himself has often made and cites as a reason that he has volunteered to die, protesting the unfairness of the death penalty.

In addition, Oregon only executes those who volunteer, Kitzhaber said.

[image]http://media.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/photo/10120807-small.jpg[/image]View full sizeThe Associated PressDeath row inmate Gary Haugen is led into the Marion County Courthouse in Salem in October.While Oregon has ignored the problems in its death penalty system, Kitzhaber noted that other states have abolished executions. Illinois, New Jersey and New Mexico all have joined the ranks of states that no longer include capital punishment as a sentencing option, recognizing the serious flaws and high costs of maintaining the death penalty, he said.

Haugen's case is forcing the state to confront problems with the death penalty, Kitzhaber said. The state needs to engage in a debate about less-costly, more equitable alternatives, he said.

Haugen has been on death row since 2007 for the fatal stabbing of inmate David Polin. Before then, he had been serving a life sentence with the possibility of parole for the 1981 beating death of his ex-girlfriend's mother, Mary Archer.

Kitzhaber said he met with family members of Haugen's victims. "My heart goes out to them," the governor said, his voice quavering. "Unquestionably this decision will delay the closure that they deserve."

Ard Pratt, the ex-husband of Mary Archer, said Kitzhaber's decision was "just wrong."

"We are again just plain devastated," Pratt said. "This is such a miscarriage of justice."

Steven Gorham, Haugen's attorney, said he had not yet talked to the inmate, but predicted Haugen would be very disappointed. Haugen's commitment to going through with the execution has not wavered, Gorham said.

Neither he nor Haugen had expected Kitzhaber to intervene, Gorham said. He doesn't know what will happen next.

Kitzhaber said he supports adopting a sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole instead of capital punishment and will ask the state Legislature to come up with possible reforms for the 2013 session.

The move comes a day after the Oregon Supreme Court cleared the way for Haugen's execution. Kitzhaber declined to commute Haugen's sentence, saying he believes the state must decide for itself on the need for a statewide debate over capital punishment.

"I am convinced we can find a better solution that keeps society safe, supports the victims of crime and their families and reflects Oregon values," he wrote. "I refuse to be a part of this compromised and inequitable system any longer; and I will not allow further executions while I am Governor."

While Kitzhaber's move is still rare, it is part of a national slowdown in the use of the death penalty, said Richard Dieter, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center.

Last year, 112 people were handed death sentences in the United States, he said, a 60 percent drop from the 1990s, when about 300 people were sentenced to die each year. The number of executions has dropped 50 percent from 98 in 1999 to 46 last year, according to the center's research.

More states are abolishing the death penalty too, Dieter said. Since 2007, three states -- New Jersey, New Mexico and Illinois --  have done away with capital punishment. Before 2007, Dieter said, no state had done that since the '60s.




kalikshama -> RE: Oregon Governor Halts all executions (11/22/2011 4:13:25 PM)

US police chiefs rank death penalty last in crime reduction priorities

The World Coalition Against the Death Penalty has published a report highlighting the failure of the death penalty as a crime-fighting tool in the United States.

The report, published in October 2009 and entitled "Smart on Crime: Reconsidering the Death Penalty in a Time of Economic Crisis" states that in a national poll, police chiefs ranked the death penalty last in their priorities for effective crime reduction. "The officers do not believe the death penalty acts as a deterrent to murder, and they rate it as one of most inefficient uses of taxpayer dollars in fighting crime."

The report concludes that states could save hundreds of millions by abolishing the death penalty.




Nosathro -> RE: Oregon Governor Halts all executions (11/22/2011 4:24:08 PM)

It is always interesting. The government decides what to do, even when the voters want it.

1920: Voters restore the death penalty.

1978: Voters re-enact the death penalty.

1984: Voters reinstate the death penalty




Iamsemisweet -> RE: Oregon Governor Halts all executions (11/22/2011 4:40:29 PM)

Not the government, nosathro, the Governor.  This seems like a unilateral decision to me, and ignores the will of not only the voters, but the courts and the legislature.

Not saying that it isn't the right thing to do, I am just surprised that he is single handedly making the decision.




PatrickG38 -> RE: Oregon Governor Halts all executions (11/24/2011 8:01:08 AM)

The clemency power almost always rests in the head of state's hands.




Termyn8or -> RE: Oregon Governor Halts all executions (11/24/2011 11:30:50 AM)

quote:

The World Coalition Against the Death Penalty has published a report highlighting the failure of the death penalty as a crime-fighting tool in the United States.


Then The World Coalition Against the Death Penalty should pay for their incarceration.

They should also take a course in logic, you wear a seatbelt to stay alive but you won't avoid murdering someone for the same reason ?

I don't even need to hear from the police cheifs, I just don't recognize their expertise in the matter. I also question their motivation because if there were no criminals they would be out of a job.

There is not, and will not be an effective deterrent to crime in this country. Those who know what is going on are pissed and therefore don't care what happens to them, others are too stupid to care. Law abiding means middle class, the poor and the rich generally do whatever the hell they want. We don't have much middle class left these days.

T^T




popeye1250 -> RE: Oregon Governor Halts all executions (11/24/2011 5:17:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

It is always interesting. The government decides what to do, even when the voters want it.

1920: Voters restore the death penalty.

1978: Voters re-enact the death penalty.

1984: Voters reinstate the death penalty


Yes, shouldn't he be doing what The People want and are paying him to do instead of what "he" thinks?
That's just like a politician saying that he is going to vote "his conscience", get rid of *anyone* who says that!




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
3.515625E-02