RE: Security and immigration GOP debate (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


popeye1250 -> RE: Security and immigration GOP debate (11/23/2011 11:37:49 AM)

And why isn't Oblunder talking about closing that Mexican border and deporting all illegal aliens like he's (supposed) to be doing?
He just isn't up to the job. Oh, and didn't Janet Napolitano say that they Mexican border was "secure?"
Funny, they found three more tunnels there this week alone.
And again, since when did enforcing our laws become "optional?"




Owner59 -> RE: Security and immigration GOP debate (11/23/2011 11:44:36 AM)


"talking about closing that Mexican border"

Same reason why you`re not talking about fucking without that little blue pill.

It`s not possible.




popeye1250 -> RE: Security and immigration GOP debate (11/23/2011 12:10:14 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59


"talking about closing that Mexican border"

Same reason why you`re not talking about fucking without that little blue pill.

It`s not possible.


Lol, still shaken up about that "Oblunder's Report Card" post?




mnottertail -> RE: Security and immigration GOP debate (11/23/2011 12:25:28 PM)

Had those who talk and talk and talk and talk, actually enforced borders instead of slacking their way thru and retiring bellied up to the government trough, we wouldn't be having immigration problems today. 




tazzygirl -> RE: Security and immigration GOP debate (11/23/2011 12:41:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59


"talking about closing that Mexican border"

Same reason why you`re not talking about fucking without that little blue pill.

It`s not possible.


Lol, still shaken up about that "Oblunder's Report Card" post?




Hard to be shaken up about proven lies, pops.




slvemike4u -> RE: Security and immigration GOP debate (11/23/2011 4:27:17 PM)

Pops,is it possible you could stick to the actual point...namely the Republican debate...not President Obama .
Please do try, I know the mind tends to wander when you get ancient...but please try [:)]




DomYngBlk -> RE: Security and immigration GOP debate (11/23/2011 4:44:14 PM)

I watched the whole thing. Funny thing is the only sane one in the bunch never gets asked any questions. Hilarious that the republican position on Immigration is basically tracking back to the Democratic position. Grampa is getting sad....Someone needs to whisper to him to leave the stage. Does Santorum go to sleep with a Reagan blow up doll each night? Newt newt..your creepy. Flipper was his fine self flopping all over the stage. Perry..............Herman and the Hair.....maybe they can start doing standup?

End of the night. I am sure Obama slept well.




SternSkipper -> RE: Security and immigration GOP debate (11/23/2011 5:37:31 PM)

quote:

Ron Paul likes to mention McVeigh to reinforce his argument against profiling. Taking that reference out of context, Gingrich succeeded at getting applause but inadvertently helped make Ron Paul's point. McVeigh doesn't fit the stereotype, so profiling is not only unconstitutional and racist, it is bad policy. "We can have security without sacrificing our Bill of Rights."


He ought to be careful... Half his supporters talk like McVeigh...  Maybe that the subliminal bait. "Vote for us or ... Well you know what'll happen."
[:D]





popeye1250 -> RE: Security and immigration GOP debate (11/23/2011 9:51:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:

Ron Paul likes to mention McVeigh to reinforce his argument against profiling. Taking that reference out of context, Gingrich succeeded at getting applause but inadvertently helped make Ron Paul's point. McVeigh doesn't fit the stereotype, so profiling is not only unconstitutional and racist, it is bad policy. "We can have security without sacrificing our Bill of Rights."


He ought to be careful... Half his supporters talk like McVeigh...  Maybe that the subliminal bait. "Vote for us or ... Well you know what'll happen."
[:D]




Skipper, there was nothing "conservative" about Mc Veigh.  He was a far left radical.




tazzygirl -> RE: Security and immigration GOP debate (11/23/2011 10:05:05 PM)

McVeigh was a registered Republican when he lived in Buffalo, New York in the 1980s, and had a membership in the National Rifle Association while in the military.[85]

McVeigh was raised Roman Catholic.[86] During his childhood, he and his father attended Mass regularly.[87] McVeigh was confirmed at the Good Shepherd Church in Pendleton, New York, in 1985.[88] In a 1996 interview, McVeigh professed belief in "a God", although he said he had "sort of lost touch with" Catholicism and "I never really picked it up, however I do maintain core beliefs."[86] In the 2001 book American Terrorist, McVeigh stated that he did not believe in Hell and that science is his religion.[89][90] In June, 2001, a day before the execution, McVeigh wrote a letter to the Buffalo News identifying as agnostic.[91] Before his execution, McVeigh took the Catholic sacrament of the Anointing of the Sick.[92]


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_McVeigh#Political_views_and_religious_beliefs




Hillwilliam -> RE: Security and immigration GOP debate (11/23/2011 10:08:08 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:

Ron Paul likes to mention McVeigh to reinforce his argument against profiling. Taking that reference out of context, Gingrich succeeded at getting applause but inadvertently helped make Ron Paul's point. McVeigh doesn't fit the stereotype, so profiling is not only unconstitutional and racist, it is bad policy. "We can have security without sacrificing our Bill of Rights."


He ought to be careful... Half his supporters talk like McVeigh...  Maybe that the subliminal bait. "Vote for us or ... Well you know what'll happen."
[:D]




Skipper, there was nothing "conservative" about Mc Veigh.  He was a far left radical.


Ya know, pops, I had to look at that post 3 times to make sure that someone from the pacific northwest hadn't written it.

McVeigh a lefty?????? Are you fucking NUTS?




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125