FirmhandKY -> RE: Was a foreign invader on your dinner table this Thaksgiving? (11/25/2011 2:46:09 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DarkSteven Idiots. 1. Geller's assertion is that slaughterhouses kill both conventionally and by halal, and then mix the birds. That's ridiculous - halal slaughter is more expensive that regular slaughter - to mix the birds afterward would mean that no observant Muslim would buy the bird since he or she would not be certain it was halal. In other words, an added expense with no benefit whatsoever. The basis of her Butterball assertion is that someone who read her website allegedly contacted a low level Butterball customer service rep who asserted that all their turkeys are halal. Not only that, I bet that every single slaughterhouse has well-defined procedures for how to kill and process birds. To have a second line that has different processes, just because, is NOT how manufacturing processes work. 2. Fisher's assertion is equally ridiculous and completely unsupported. The muddled thinking is fallacious on two grounds: 1. Observant Jews and Muslims will want turkeys that are kosher and halal, respectively. (There's so little difference between them that I assume that US Muslims frequently buy kosher birds because it's easier to find them.) There is no way they will buy a bird that has not been certified because there's a chance it meets their dietary needs. 2. Eating a kosher or halal bird means little. It DOES mean that the bird has been slaughtered under cleaner conditions, etc., than required under conventional slaughter but usually that means little. (A notable exception was during the mad cow scare, when it was disclosed that conventional cattle were fed organs from slaughtered cattle, which of course raises the chance of a disease spreading, while kosher cattle were not raised cannabilistically.) So you're not supporting a rogue Arab nation or fanatical imam eating halal. Hey, Steven, quit talking rationally. Fightdirecto isn't actually actually interested in any of that stuff. He just wants to vaunt his "superiority" over all those "stupid, ignorant, rightwingtards". (You know ... anyone who disagrees with him?) The article was a "get his jollies off" post, based on BS, argued through BS logic, used simply to hit other people over the head with his "intelligent cutting wit". Firm Oh, wait ... betcha he will claim "it was a joke!" [8D]
|
|
|
|