Campaign Reform

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

Campaign Reform

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> Campaign Reform

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Campaign Reform - 5/27/2006 5:06:12 PM

ArtCatDom

Posts: 478
Joined: 1/20/2005
Status: offline

Here are three things I believe would help the political process in America. If you believe in any of this, write a letter to your Senator, Governor, all legislative reps, etc. Petitions seem nice, but letters count much more.

Push for ballot access have even and fair requirements for all candidates regardless of party and regardless of incumbancy. Ballot access widely varies among the fifty states and heavily favors established parties and candidates. This will be one of the most difficult reforms to pass. Elected officials range in their responses from dismissive, apathetic, frustrated to interested but doubtful of its prospects.

Push to close campaign finance loopholes allowing foreign corporations and corporations of foreign ownership to contribute through subsidaries. This is the one I've received the most positive feedback regarding and probably the best chance of passing. This is a concept, when properly worded, that appeals strongly to both left and right. Liberals seem to take an interest in this from an anticorporate viewpoint. Conservatives seem to take an interest in the protecting American sovereignty from foreign influence viewpoint. For reference, George W. (or an aide) expressed the viewpoint that foreign dollars are already banned, so this is a moot point (nice sidestep). Hillary expressed pretty much apathy and a view that there's no problem to see (head in sand, hand on pocket book).

Push for all presidential candidates registered in a minimum of 45 out of 50 states to participate in "the" presidential debates. Despite the claims about "hundreds" running for President of the United States, very very few make it on that many ballots every year. More recently, it will usually be the Green candidate, the Libertarian Candidate and sometimes one more. Watching the Greens and Libterarians rip apart the two parties on two of their main political bases would do wonders in my opinion. It might actually force it to be something of a real debate. Many politicians express an utterly non-committal, say-nothing stance on this issue. If you fail to confront the issue that only a few candidates will make it in, the age-old meme of "hundreds" being allowed to debate will come out of the chest. A decent minority express some interest, but severe reservation about its likelihood.

Just some thoughts.

*meow*

Profile

Post #: 1

RE: Campaign Reform - 5/27/2006 9:08:46 PM

pahunkboy

Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline

...sorta puzzling why they need campaigne money. The ballot does state the candidates that are running. The horse and pony show tells me- not much more.

Do a search on area businesses. I was surprised just about every place I shop gave money to this and that- notably bush. I wanted to confront the vendor-- but that would be pointless, cause the workers on location are peons.

Governement-elections have become a quid pro quo deal. Puppeteers really.

As long as we are dazzled by celebrity hype=- infotainment news- and basically mindless noise. we follow.

Hey cat- did you know diabold had fake office locations in PA and FL ? [a walmart and a self storage location]

The public be damned. This is NOT what my war veterans family fought for.

Is there any hope? I mean really? Is there ?

(in reply to ArtCatDom)

Profile

Post #: 2