RE: Barney Frank won't run for reelection. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Owner59 -> RE: Barney Frank won't run for reelection. (11/30/2011 8:10:04 PM)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/29/barney-frank-retirement-reporters_n_1118609.html?ref=politics




MasterSlaveLA -> RE: Barney Frank won't run for reelection. (11/30/2011 9:49:52 PM)

LOL... Barney is/was/forever shall be a fucking idiot!!!


[image]local://upfiles/687741/74195A58EFA8471191A54026BA60C961.gif[/image]




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Barney Frank won't run for reelection. (11/30/2011 9:56:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA

LOL... Barney is/was/forever shall be a fucking idiot!!!


[image]local://upfiles/687741/74195A58EFA8471191A54026BA60C961.gif[/image]


Unfortunately he is actually a very smart man. Unfortunately he's also corrupt, a liar and a coward who bullies people who disagree with him, whether they are other Congressmen, students or consituents.




provfivetine -> RE: Barney Frank won't run for reelection. (11/30/2011 10:20:30 PM)

Good Riddance. What a hack this guy is; help induce a catastrophic housing meltdown and leave with lavish benefits - that's Congress for you.




Owner59 -> RE: Barney Frank won't run for reelection. (12/1/2011 6:02:33 AM)

The meltdown started long before he joined the finance committee, in '06'.

Just as dumb as ever ,eh?




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Barney Frank won't run for reelection. (12/1/2011 7:40:04 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

The meltdown started long before he joined the finance committee, in '06'.

Just as dumb as ever ,eh?


Frank and Waters were blocking attempts to regulate Fannie and Freddie in 2004. The CDO market they enabled grew from $20 billion to $180 billion from 2004 to 2007. The "meltdown" due to CDOs happened in 2008.

I wont address a dumb remark coming from you. I'd laugh to hard to type.




Owner59 -> RE: Barney Frank won't run for reelection. (12/1/2011 6:18:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

The meltdown started long before he joined the finance committee, in '06'.

Just as dumb as ever ,eh?


Frank and Waters were blocking attempts to regulate Fannie and Freddie in 2004. The CDO market they enabled grew from $20 billion to $180 billion from 2004 to 2007. The "meltdown" due to CDOs happened in 2008.

I wont address a dumb remark coming from you. I'd laugh to hard to type.

Prove it.




provfivetine -> RE: Barney Frank won't run for reelection. (12/1/2011 6:52:16 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Prove it.



Here you go slappy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Barney Frank won't run for reelection. (12/1/2011 7:45:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: provfivetine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Prove it.



Here you go slappy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs



He doesnt really want proof, he was just to embarassed to quote Queen again, once I pointed out the irony of a homophobe needing Freddie Mercury to give him something to say.




Owner59 -> RE: Barney Frank won't run for reelection. (12/1/2011 7:54:42 PM)

Alright kid.

I`ll ask like you`re a two year old.


Show us the voting record or news clipping showing Franks "blocking" regulation of fannie or freddie.


Ya know,proof...........a word related to "prove".


And back up the asinine notion that fannie and fredie brought down the entire US economy.


It`s bullshit talking points that you`re just regurgitating.


The actual real reason Franks is con-enemy #1 is because he helped put in place the REAL REGULATIONS just after the 08 meltdown,that affect a primary GOP contributor.....banksters.


But I bet you`re to clueless to understand that that is what Franks has been demonized for.







Moonhead -> RE: Barney Frank won't run for reelection. (12/2/2011 4:51:03 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
Frank and Waters were blocking attempts to regulate Fannie and Freddie in 2004.


Back in '92, in fact:
[image]http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_0MC_2RLophw/S_GsuD5SuFI/AAAAAAAACQY/UibyuIvjBk4/s1600/The+Frank+And+Walters+-+Grand+Parade.jpg[/image]





Sanity -> RE: Barney Frank won't run for reelection. (12/2/2011 5:48:19 AM)



It is written that "There are none so blind as those who will not see" but here you go anyway

http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/barone/2008/10/06/democrats-were-wrong-on-fannie-mae-and-freddie-mac

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/17/opinion/17brooks.html?_r=1









Owner59 -> RE: Barney Frank won't run for reelection. (12/2/2011 8:33:23 AM)

You cons were in control the whole fuck`n time.


Complete control of all three branches and you did nothing to stop the crash,rather more of the opposite.Earth to cons,earth to cons,deregulation is a con ideal.


You were given the best economy in world history and you drove into near depression levels.


All normal Americans need to do is point that out and that if given control again,your ilk will do exactly what you did back then,again.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Barney Frank won't run for reelection. (12/2/2011 9:50:56 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

You cons were in control the whole fuck`n time.




You need a new history book. Thats total bullshit.




mnottertail -> RE: Barney Frank won't run for reelection. (12/2/2011 10:02:02 AM)

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0774721.html

Republican control:

Senate:
years 81-87 and 97-09
With a couple ties in there
House:
years 95-07 and now.

You're right, you are spouting total bullshit, wilbur.  You need a new reality.




Sanity -> RE: Barney Frank won't run for reelection. (12/2/2011 11:16:09 AM)


Typical of that sort of leftist, he hops from one big lie to the next never understanding the truth or reality of such matters even in his own mind

Never wanting to understand

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

You cons were in control the whole fuck`n time.




You need a new history book. Thats total bullshit.




Sanity -> RE: Barney Frank won't run for reelection. (12/2/2011 11:18:05 AM)


By your reckoning thats total control " the whole fuck`n time"? [:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0774721.html

Republican control:

Senate:
years 81-87 and 97-09
With a couple ties in there
House:
years 95-07 and now.

You're right, you are spouting total bullshit, wilbur.  You need a new reality.





mnottertail -> RE: Barney Frank won't run for reelection. (12/2/2011 11:20:47 AM)

No must be your idea (it was given to you, you dont have any) but it demonstrates the total bullshit aspect of history.

Try to follow along silently, mouthing the words to yourself perhaps, as an aid to understanding these adult conversations before you blurt out asswipe that has nothing to do with the gist of the points being made.




Sanity -> RE: Barney Frank won't run for reelection. (12/2/2011 11:35:48 AM)


"Owner" was arguing that the Republicans were in control the whole time

You argued that they werent, apparently youre in the neocon club now and dont have a clue what side youre on...

Thanks for playing

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

No must be your idea (it was given to you, you dont have any) but it demonstrates the total bullshit aspect of history.

Try to follow along silently, mouthing the words to yourself perhaps, as an aid to understanding these adult conversations before you blurt out asswipe that has nothing to do with the gist of the points being made.




mnottertail -> RE: Barney Frank won't run for reelection. (12/2/2011 11:40:45 AM)

Don't tell me what I was arguing.
You havent the werewithal to do so, prima facie, and certainly no capacity for independent,  intelligent thought. 

The bulk of the time  the house (you know....the money guys) were in republican hands for the greatest and most perfidious times of destruction of the american economy.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875