RE: Iran invades the UK (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


DarkSteven -> RE: Iran invades the UK (11/29/2011 7:37:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/30/world/middleeast/tehran-protesters-storm-british-embassy.html?_r=2&hp

How many times do we stand by and let them invade a NATO nation before we take action?


?????

They attacked Britain's embassy.  NOT the US embassy.  This is Britain's affair, not ours.  If Britain wishes to request a NATO action, let 'em.




kdsub -> RE: Iran invades the UK (11/29/2011 8:30:29 PM)

Thank you sweetheart...now what is it you did not like about my post...maybe we can discuss our opinion differences like men instead of smart asses.

Butch




kdsub -> RE: Iran invades the UK (11/29/2011 8:35:15 PM)

OK tweak...now we are even... let um off the hook this time...next time we kick ass...all right with you?

Butch




tweakabelle -> RE: Iran invades the UK (11/29/2011 9:12:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

OK tweak...now we are even... let um off the hook this time...next time we kick ass...all right with you?

Butch

If you say so Butch [:D]

You might like to ponder why the loudest voices for yet another Western military intervention in the ME are coming from the Zionist lobby.

If Israel had found a sensible compromise with its neighbours, then one of the major sources of ME instability would be permanently removed. And we wouldn't be being manipulated by the Zionist lobby to get them off a hook of their own making.




Anaxagoras -> RE: Iran invades the UK (11/29/2011 10:22:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/30/world/middleeast/tehran-protesters-storm-british-embassy.html?_r=2&hp

How many times do we stand by and let them invade a NATO nation before we take action?

I think military action over this incident alone would be OTT, if thats what you were suggesting. I think this violent reaction to UK sanctions is an indicator how sensitive Iran is to the sanctions, suggesting they could gravely damage the authority of the government. The West should redouble efforts to make China and Russia agree to more severe sanctions.




MadAxeman -> RE: Iran invades the UK (11/29/2011 11:15:25 PM)

The Iranian gubment has gained huge popular support with their stand against what they see as western oppression keeping them from progress. IMHO They should be entitled to modern power sources. I also think they should allow inspectors absolute freedom to inspect, which hasn't been happening.
Anti nuke feeling is way higher in Britain than the U.S. One minute CND and the like are rife and we're all pinkos, now we're fascists that love the bomb?
What's worrying is that with pro democracy uprisings becoming spontaneous and unpredictable, what would a drowning gubment with Hiroshima type ability do as it's head disappeared below the waves? What would Gaddhafi or Saddam have done? America is still the only nation to nuke another country. But hey, you're just a looney rock hmm? And Iran is sensible?




rulemylife -> RE: Iran invades the UK (11/29/2011 11:49:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Lucy do you think this was an orchestrated action to send a message to the UK? I do...Planned and executed by the ruling party...not a few kids on a protest.

Can we ignore the actions of a government simply because some citizens did not have a hand in it?

Ultimately…just like here in the US… the citizens of any country are responsible for the actions of their government. If they don’t like their leaders then it is up to them to change them or pay the price for their inaction.

Butch


So, by your logic every citizen in the U.S. is responsible for the Iraq invasion, even though it was vehemently opposed by a majority of the population.




MadAxeman -> RE: Iran invades the UK (11/29/2011 11:55:33 PM)

Don't elect cunts then.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Iran invades the UK (11/30/2011 12:14:26 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Lucy do you think this was an orchestrated action to send a message to the UK? I do...Planned and executed by the ruling party...not a few kids on a protest.

Can we ignore the actions of a government simply because some citizens did not have a hand in it?

Ultimately…just like here in the US… the citizens of any country are responsible for the actions of their government. If they don’t like their leaders then it is up to them to change them or pay the price for their inaction.

Butch


So, by your logic every citizen in the U.S. is responsible for the Iraq invasion, even though it was vehemently opposed by a majority of the population.



Yeah, I guess 60% in favor of military action to remove Hussein in 2003 (without even taking into account the WMD issue) represents vehement opposition by a majority of the population. At least in your bizarro world.




BoxwineForBrunch -> RE: Iran invades the UK (11/30/2011 1:23:50 AM)

yeah. like it or not, all americans are culpable for the sins of the american empire, even those of us who stamped our feet really hard and maybe even threw a brick or two. all americans' lifestyles are being supported by the us military. all our tax dollars are funding the military. all americans are helping kill innocents around the world and all americans are benefiting from american international terrorism. nobody wants to hear that, least of all people with such good intentions, but it's true.
quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Lucy do you think this was an orchestrated action to send a message to the UK? I do...Planned and executed by the ruling party...not a few kids on a protest.

Can we ignore the actions of a government simply because some citizens did not have a hand in it?

Ultimately…just like here in the US… the citizens of any country are responsible for the actions of their government. If they don’t like their leaders then it is up to them to change them or pay the price for their inaction.

Butch


So, by your logic every citizen in the U.S. is responsible for the Iraq invasion, even though it was vehemently opposed by a majority of the population.






Politesub53 -> RE: Iran invades the UK (11/30/2011 2:25:04 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

Lucy do you think this was an orchestrated action to send a message to the UK? I do...Planned and executed by the ruling party...not a few kids on a protest.

Can we ignore the actions of a government simply because some citizens did not have a hand in it?

Ultimately…just like here in the US… the citizens of any country are responsible for the actions of their government. If they don’t like their leaders then it is up to them to change them or pay the price for their inaction.

Butch



Nothing new here, just Irans latest reaction to British policy. It certainly isnt worth going to war over.




SpanishMatMaster -> RE: Iran invades the UK (11/30/2011 2:28:51 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoxwineForBrunch
yeah. like it or not, all americans are culpable for the sins of the american empire, even those of us who stamped our feet really hard and maybe even threw a brick or two. all americans' lifestyles are being supported by the us military. all our tax dollars are funding the military. all americans are helping kill innocents around the world and all americans are benefiting from american international terrorism. nobody wants to hear that, least of all people with such good intentions, but it's true.
Well, I disagree.
But maybe it is better if I put this into context.

I was born in Chile, 1970. Allende won the elections, and wanted to create a democratic socialist state from the democratic existing capitalistic one. He wanted to do it with peaceful means and within the law. He was not anti-American, but wanted indeed to nationalise important sectors of the economy, some of them owned by American companies. They would have got a compensation, but yes, they would have lost money.

The US organised a putsch and the Chilean military performed it. Friends of my parents were killed in the infamous National Stadion. My parents have educated me pretty aware of the crimes of the US foreign policy, in Vietnam and Nicaragua, Iran and El Salvador.

At the same time, my mother was educated in the Santiago College, an US institution, with an excellent educative level and a left-oriented POV. She is proud of that American education, was a fan of JFK and has thought me to love and respect many aspects of the American culture and "dream".

I love morality as a subject, and geopolitics.

I disagree with you, BoxwineForBrunch, not because I love or hate America, but because I think that there are limits to what we can demand from a person. I am not Christian, and I deeply reject the Christian idea that we have to offer everything for the rest, and every single piece of egoism is a "sin". I consider this idea dehumanizing, absurd and utterly evil. As secular humanist, I defend a live in equilibrium between a healthy egoism, and the service to the community. Both are equally important. Caring about yourself first is not a sin.

Can I demand from an American citizen, that she goes to prison for not paying taxes, that she gets expelled from its country or has to leave, so that I can consider her "innocent" of the US foreign policy? I don't think so. I respect the healthy egoism of those Americans who consider that they "did enough" to prevent the evils of that policy, and carry on with their lives.

Who are those people? IMHO, the citizens who voted something else as the party in the Government (not the ones who did not care to vote, they are to blame) and the Congress. This is the red line of the democracy. The majority can decide. But it cannot force the minority to share the responsibility about what is done.

During the term of the Congress and Government, a person who voted the majority is responsible about the good and the evil deeds of that Congress and Government. US foreign policy during the Cold War was mostly catastrophic, but not always (in Berlin they still love your pilots), and the Cold War is over. A voter of the majority can be proud about the good, and must shame about the bad. Even if he later demonstrated against certain decision... he put in charge the man who carried it on. He should have known better. And in the case of Bush, it was predictable... Afghanistan would never had been attacked without the 11S, but Iraq? Iraq was decided before the elections.

Best regards.




stellauk -> RE: Iran invades the UK (11/30/2011 2:38:05 AM)

I also see no reason for military action, particularly given the internal situation going on within Iran at the moment.

But then again there's always the diplomatic route, something we're quite good at.




BoxwineForBrunch -> RE: Iran invades the UK (11/30/2011 2:45:18 AM)

the us involvement in deposing allende is one of the innumerable international crimes we have committed that still makes me sick to my stomach.

your moral reasoning is sound, on an intellectual level i do not disagree with you. on a visceral level that is of no consolation and i still feel anyone who feeds the american imperial beast, whether they are happy about doing so or not, is tainted and morally compromised. i suppose just because my god died young it does not mean my vestigial belief in original sin died with him. so it goes.




MrRodgers -> RE: Iran invades the UK (11/30/2011 3:21:19 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arienos

quote:

How many times do we stand by and let them invade a NATO nation before we take action?

Ken, not only was this state sponsored protest predictable, it was preventable in that eyes on the ground reported its inciting days earlier and both your Nation and mine were fully aware of its coming.

Govts. let this happen as a great propaganda tool, just like any number of 'things' that not only the 'west' lets happen but may also instigate or commit for the same purpose. It's all about keeping the people thinking they are always... always under attack.




LadyConstanze -> RE: Iran invades the UK (11/30/2011 3:37:31 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/30/world/middleeast/tehran-protesters-storm-british-embassy.html?_r=2&hp

How many times do we stand by and let them invade a NATO nation before we take action?


After your misleading headline I wondered if I slept through the invasion, then - to my great relief - I realized your header is simply wrong.

Let's hope no Americans commit a crime, because it would of course be just then to make the whole nation responsible...




Sanity -> RE: Iran invades the UK (11/30/2011 4:56:17 AM)


Wait til they have nukes.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/30/world/middleeast/tehran-protesters-storm-british-embassy.html?_r=2&hp

How many times do we stand by and let them invade a NATO nation before we take action?




kdsub -> RE: Iran invades the UK (11/30/2011 6:23:15 AM)

tweak...you are just out of touch with your own country and this one with your anti-Jewish stances. Not that anyone wants intervention in Iran...I sure don't. But people in this country are worried about the proliferation of nuclear weapons…especially with unstable countries like Korea and Iran.

The attacks on international embassies, if sanctioned, are unsettling proof of this instability.

Over and over in history when this type of aggression has been overlooked or appeased millions have suffered.

I really don’t know what can and should be done in this situation but no response should be ruled out.

Butch




kdsub -> RE: Iran invades the UK (11/30/2011 6:31:56 AM)

quote:

So, by your logic every citizen in the U.S. is responsible for the Iraq invasion, even though it was vehemently opposed by a majority of the population



No... First it was NOT opposed by the majority..It was a war based on bad information but sanctioned by the American people.

If after a policy is proven wrong and we, as a nation, don't react then yes all are at fault. However notice how we, as a nation, did react and are now reacting...We the people means the majority and the majority spoke and we changed our course.

Have you seen a change of course in Iran as you have seen here in the US? That fact puts the blame on both the fanatic ruling party and the people who allow it.

In my opinion of course.

Butch




SpanishMatMaster -> RE: Iran invades the UK (11/30/2011 6:38:20 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub
especially with unstable countries like Korea and Iran.
I beg your pardon, but Iran is not unstable. I can mention at least two countries, which are more unstable and have nukes: Israel and Pakistan. But well, they are "US-friendly" so maybe you meant something else and not "unstable"...
Best regards.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875