Owner59 -> RE: The Nature of the Lie (12/4/2011 9:28:47 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BanthaSamantha After reading a good deal of posts here, one of the most common topics discussed is the lie. People are routinely accused of lying, and the term "liar" is bandied about like a badminton shuttle. What I wonder is this: Have we stopped to consider what a lie really is? Here is an easily accessable web definition of lie. To lie is to state something with disregard to the truth with the intention that people will accept the statement as truth. Let's explore the concept. Imagine you said something like, "The service at McDonalds blows." Did you tell a lie right then? Certainly, the entity McDonalds does not have the necessary mouth or lungs, so could not hope to blow anything. Let's explore further. Imagine someone asked you if you were asked if you were going to the Kenny G concert, and you replied with an eyeroll, "Yes I am, and monkeys might fly out of my butt." Did you just tell a double lie? Clearly you don't want to go to the Kenny G concert, and there is no way monkeys could actually fly out of your butt. Here's an article from The Onion. http://www.theonion.com/articles/new-bipartisan-law-would-make-dog-neckerchiefs-man,26301/ Is this article nothing but a big pile of lies? After all, it does talk about a new law making the wearing of dog neckerchiefs mandatory, a law that does not actually exist. From one I can tell, none of these statements are actually lies. In order for something to be a lie, there must be an intent to deceive. In order for "And monkeys might fly out of my butt" to be a lie, you must actually intend the other person to believe that your butt is a nest of baby winged monkeys. Likewise, if that Onion article is nothing but lies, then every single comedy routine on SNL is a lie. Your thoughts? Though the term means something very specific, unfortunately it`s become diluted and/or made meaningless from abuse. I`ll go with something that can be proven,backed up and independently verified by multiple sources. And if you`re calling someone a liar,you best be able to prove it under the same standard as above,otherwise you`re just another chump abusing the term. Here on the boards,most people post honestly and can back up what they say or they don`t say it.They don`t want to be known as a bullshiter. We go by the unwritten code of honor that`s backed up (usually)by not wanting to be (embarrassed by being) known as dis-honest. For some people tho,bullshiting is part of the deal and there seems to be no shame about it.They use an Orwell-like term "fair and balanced" to describe it. [:D]
|
|
|
|