RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich

RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Owner59 -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/6/2011 6:19:29 AM)
added: Ya know Lucy,I don`t think something this bizarre could be dreamed up in Holywood.... But newty managed quite well......[:D] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ahhh....the feeling is still there.....feel`n the love.....[:D] An Iowa republican disses "the historian". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uuo3dBP431k&feature=related "You`re an embarrassment to our party....... Why don`t you get out before you make a BIGGER fool of yourself." Ouch![:D]

Lucylastic -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/6/2011 6:20:44 AM)
he is soaring, which means hes headin for a fall(hopefully)

Owner59 -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/6/2011 6:26:32 AM)
Oh no...."the historian" is scary talented and will save their party from Mitt. LOL!

Sanity -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/6/2011 6:26:51 AM)
They do something nice and it only increases "liberal" hate, doesnt it... quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 "Trump, Gingrich To Create Apprentice-Style Program for Poor School Kids." Not sure if newty knows it but he`s running for the president of the United States. http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/12/trump-gingrich-to-create-apprentice-style-program-for-poor-school-kids/ Maybe they can apprentice being janitors?[:D] Gross idea but reality tv peeps will love it the ten kids? the reality is they will leap at the chance to be on tv, god help them. this is a publicity stunt clusterfuck on the backs of poor kids fucking disgusting

Owner59 -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/6/2011 6:34:02 AM)
UPDATE: A senior Paul campaign source emails to push back, and hard: "We agree, of course, with former Speaker Gingrich — this is a country of people of enormous talent. Those who deliver thousands of babies like Dr. Paul and those who spend their time focusing on promoting themselves for profit. We even have those who lobby, but don't call it such because, as they say, they can make $60,000 per speech. While those of us in the Paul camp might disagree with Newt Gingrich about whether Donald Trump is the right man to host a serious political debate, we do agree New York is a wonderful place to go at Christmas. We are sure two average Americans like Speaker Gingrich and Donald Trump will have a wonderful time picking out gifts for their wives. We suggest a place called Tiffany's, we her it is quite nice this time of year and given their celebrity status they can probably get special deals and $500,000 lines of credit." Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/69792.html#ixzz1flV97WRK Ouch![:D]

Lucylastic -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/6/2011 6:36:20 AM)
what would be nice is if they could come up with a way to get millions of people back into retraining for decent jobs and people back to work in the REAL world. And not pander to voters thinking they are doing something wonderful, when the people benefitting will be studio execs, themselves and their propaganda sucking supporters who can call it"nice" and get tingles up their shins. ten kids, yeah, they couldnt use the money on not making any profit off the kids but help fifty behind the scenes but you are right, its important they be allowed to make money off these "poor kids "

Lucylastic -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/6/2011 6:38:02 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 UPDATE: A senior Paul campaign source emails to push back, and hard: "We agree, of course, with former Speaker Gingrich — this is a country of people of enormous talent. Those who deliver thousands of babies like Dr. Paul and those who spend their time focusing on promoting themselves for profit. We even have those who lobby, but don't call it such because, as they say, they can make $60,000 per speech. While those of us in the Paul camp might disagree with Newt Gingrich about whether Donald Trump is the right man to host a serious political debate, we do agree New York is a wonderful place to go at Christmas. We are sure two average Americans like Speaker Gingrich and Donald Trump will have a wonderful time picking out gifts for their wives. We suggest a place called Tiffany's, we her it is quite nice this time of year and given their celebrity status they can probably get special deals and $500,000 lines of credit." Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/69792.html#ixzz1flV97WRK Ouch![:D] MIAOWWWWWWW, LMAO

Lucylastic -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/6/2011 6:40:55 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 added: Ya know Lucy,I don`t think something this bizarre could be dreamed up in Holywood.... But newty managed quite well......[:D] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ahhh....the feeling is still there.....feel`n the love.....[:D] An Iowa republican disses "the historian". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uuo3dBP431k&feature=related "You`re an embarrassment to our party....... Why don`t you get out before you make a BIGGER fool of yourself." Ouch![:D] eating ones own is always ugly , but like a rubber necker, you dont wanna look, but its j ust to weird to ignore

farglebargle -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/6/2011 6:43:02 AM)
Hey, at least JFK served his nation in uniform, unlike that draft-dodging Newt Gingrich... If fact, after he couldn't get into the Army, he had his dad pull strings to GET HIM ENLISTED IN THE NAVY instead. quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity They could have vetted JFK like they vet dogs as well, wouldnt have hurt anything

DarkSteven -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/6/2011 6:52:09 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: farglebargle If fact, after he couldn't get into the Army, he had his dad pull strings to GET HIM ENLISTED IN THE NAVY instead. Different times. I read that JFK was determined to have a political career, and had his family use their influence to get him into the service because he thought it was necessary for political success.

Lucylastic -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/6/2011 7:10:42 AM)
I actually like this piece by O Donnell, even tho I cant stand himself Regarding Trumps latest media attraction too funny http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540#45562312

Sanity -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/6/2011 7:28:08 AM)
Thats a stupid post, considering Obamas service record, and Clintons quote: ORIGINAL: farglebargle Hey, at least JFK served his nation in uniform, unlike that draft-dodging Newt Gingrich... If fact, after he couldn't get into the Army, he had his dad pull strings to GET HIM ENLISTED IN THE NAVY instead. quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity They could have vetted JFK like they vet dogs as well, wouldnt have hurt anything

mnottertail -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/6/2011 7:36:10 AM)
A veteran knows what a flag looks like, and a veteran would say what fuckin service record of Obamas? Why would he have one? Have the courage of your insinuations.

Lucylastic -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/6/2011 7:40:53 AM)
theres that ODS again surprise

Sanity -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/6/2011 7:46:05 AM)
Leftists were waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay beyond deranged over Bush... which is where you got your copycat ODS bs Ever have an original thought? quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic theres that ODS again surprise

mnottertail -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/6/2011 7:46:56 AM)
Well the fuckin kid was 12 when the last scrip came thru the service in this country for fucks sake. Somebody should vet these ignorant insinuations.

Hillwilliam -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/6/2011 7:52:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Leftists were waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay beyond deranged over Bush... which is where you got your copycat ODS bs Ever have an original thought? quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic theres that ODS again surprise pssssssst. The thread is about Newt. Do attempt to stay on topic please. We wouldn't want any GASSSSSSSSSP derails would we?

Lucylastic -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/6/2011 7:56:22 AM)
that was my point, off topic with his ODS

farglebargle -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/6/2011 9:15:58 AM)
If you didn't want to discuss JFK, why did you bring him up in the first place? quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Thats a stupid post, considering Obamas service record, and Clintons quote: ORIGINAL: farglebargle Hey, at least JFK served his nation in uniform, unlike that draft-dodging Newt Gingrich... If fact, after he couldn't get into the Army, he had his dad pull strings to GET HIM ENLISTED IN THE NAVY instead. quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity They could have vetted JFK like they vet dogs as well, wouldnt have hurt anything

Moonhead -> RE: Vetting Newt Gingrich (12/6/2011 10:29:07 AM)
He wanted to discuss Kennedy until he realised it was making him look like a tit, then he changed his mind.

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875