InvisibleBlack
Posts: 865
Joined: 7/24/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle On a more general note, I wonder if the current financial mess in the Eurozone is blinding people to the singular achievement of the EU - an unparalleled half century of peace, freedom and prosperity in Western Europe. What has this been worth? Surely, the institutions that have delivered this peace bounty are worth keeping! Without understating the gravity of the current crisis, I do hope that people don't rush to throw the baby out with the bathwater. In my view, I think you have this backwards. It's not that the EU created the desire for peace - it's that after two brutal bloody pointless wars that devasted the entire continet, Europe's overall outlook changed from expansionist and aggressive to peace-seeking. The original ECSC and the EEC that grew out of it were expressions of the desire to avoid another bloodbath. Also, bear in mind that the "century of peace, freedom and prosperity in Western Europe" was bought at the price of leaving Eastern Europe in the oppressive grasp of Soviet domination for decades. All of this being said, the people who survived the World Wars are mostly gone and even their children are aging. The spirit which motivated that early EEC is not that one that moves the EU currently. I think the Maastricht Treaty was a mistake and I think the Treaty of Lisbon was a worse one. This latest Treaty is just more of the same and I expect we'll see another series of fiscal crises and meltdowns over the next year as well. They seem to be desperately rushing to create a supranational absolute government entity and giving the peoples under them no time to adjust. The entire strategy for addressing this crisis seems to be attempting to discover new ways to manufacture more debt to loan to nations which will never be able to repay the debts they have let alone even greater amounts of newer debts - all so the banks of northern Europe don't have to write off loans that they should never have made in the first place. This isn't a workable system. I expect that in the end, this will find the classic solution of history, it will wrap itself up in a war. When I asked "What do you do when a foreign nation takes control of your currency, beggars your government, drives your people into poverty, takes away your ability to have any influence on your leadership, and begins to extract the wealth of your people?" one of the guys at work replied "Assassinate Archduke Franz Ferdinand!" Actually, didn't someone just mail a bomb to the CEO of one of the German banks? I'd forgotten about that. quote:
ORIGINAL: tj444 I dunno.. I think a narrower focus of a strong trade bloc agreement would have worked much better than trying to create a whole central govt..I think they tried to bite off more than they could chew.. Yes, different languages, different cultures, ideals, economic status, all that makes a central govt hard to work. I think an open economic community would have been a wonderful idea. If you allow the free flow of capital and labor across borders, eventually a balanced system will result. The single currency was not a good idea and it jammed several of mechanisms economic forces typically use to adjust markets. Bringing member nations in against the wishes of the populace (or not even allowing the populace a say) wasn't a good idea either. I do not see how that can possibly fail to foster resentment, especially when things go wrong. quote:
ORIGINAL: tj444 Sure the states in the US have it easier but imo the US is a country divided, you are either a R or a D... and i have not seen the govt been able to do much other than keep printing money.. and with OWS and tea parties and protests, i dont know where the US will end up. I sometimes feel watching US politics is like watching a very weird sureal movie or soap opera written by someone on drugs.. I've been thinking about this and I think the bitter divisions are an inescapable result of the centralization of power. In a weak central government design, you can have your community and I can have my community and while we may disagree and/or even dislike each others lifestyles/ideas - we're not immediately threatened by them. You create a powerful central government that creates "one size fits all" laws and then your side has to win, otherwise the other guy is forcing his ideas onto you. The idea that one entity can craft a single set of all-encompassing regulations and laws that will seamlessly fit 300 million people is nonsensical. The big trick is to find the proper balance between small rogue states and a weak central power, and so much central power that the center becomes the sole focus. While everyone praises "diversity", the sad fact is that around here they're only comfortable if people are diverse in acceptable (and non-threatening) ways. The creation of greater and greater centralized control and more and more powerful governments is, in my opinion, only going to lead to greater conflict and more resentment and grief - whether in Europe or in the United States. To quote Princess Leia "The more you tighten your grip, Tarkin, the more star systems will slip through your fingers."
_____________________________
Consider the daffodil. And while you're doing that, I'll be over here, looking through your stuff.
|