Padriag
Posts: 2633
Joined: 3/30/2005 Status: offline
|
I’ve had a question on my mind lately. It is simply this, should knowledge regarding techniques and methods in this lifestyle have a cost, should they be earned, and if so how? In mulling this question over I’ve looked at it from two sides. On the one side is the idea that no, the knowledge should be free and freely accessible to any who seek it. On the other side is the idea that such knowledge should come at the cost of being earned, access should be in some way limited. Each argument has its merits. Keep it Free On the premise that knowledge should be free, one could argue that all knowledge regarding techniques in BDSM play, slave training, managing power exchange relationships, poly relationships, etc. should be freely and openly available to all. The case can be made that by making such knowledge freely available that people can be safer, make fewer mistakes, have better relationships, etc. There is truth to that. Certainly by knowing how to safely do bondage sessions for example, people are able to be safer in their play. Books like SM101 help with this by providing some of the basics on a variety of play forms. Likewise, information about managing various styles of relationships could help people go on to have better and more successful relationships. Information on slave training techniques and methods would be very useful to owners facing problems or new owners still learning how to train. By putting all such information in a public venue, the information can be examined, discussed and vetted so that we all learn what is and is not genuinely useful. Earn It Knowledge is power (potentially), and power should not be simply handed to just anyone. An individual should be required to earn such knowledge as way of limiting access to those willing to devote the time and energy to gaining it. While it won’t prevent those intent on abusing such knowledge, it will limit it from being casually abused by a 14 year old with a computer. We also tend to appreciate most those things we had to earn, and thus if we have to earn such knowledge we’ll better appreciate what we have. Third, by having to earn knowledge over time, it gives the individual time to more fully understand what they are learning and the potential of that knowledge (and presumably if the person is ethical they will use it with greater care). In short, it can be argued that limiting knowledge can also make things safer. This seems more true with the basics, and less true with some more advanced concepts. For example, if written instructions on fire play or electrical play were widely available it might encourage more to try them. But these forms of play are dangerous, especially without instruction, and such written instructions could create a false sense of security (well, I read the literature… I don’t understand what went wrong.. what do you mean I was supposed to use ethanol… you mean I can’t use Jim Bean?). So here are the questions for discussion. Should knowledge regarding techniques and methods be freely available or restricted to those who earn it in some way? Should some forms of knowledge be freely available and others not, if so, what would you put in each group? If you think some or all knowledge should be restricted, by whom and how is it earned? Should knowledge simply be left to those who can acquire it on their own, meaning no one really shares their knowledge and everyone is on their own to figure things out? What about published books which present such knowledge at a monetary price, how do you feel about that? I look forward to the discussion.
_____________________________
Padriag A stern discipline pervades all nature, which is a little cruel so that it may be very kind - Edmund Spencer
|