Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

McCaskill-led earmark probe finds $834 million in requests


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> McCaskill-led earmark probe finds $834 million in requests Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
McCaskill-led earmark probe finds $834 million in requests - 12/12/2011 9:19:38 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
A six-month study of this year’s defense authorization bill has identified 115 spending proposals as earmarks worth $834 million, including 20 by Republican freshmen who campaigned against the pet projects, according to a copy of the report provided to The Washington Post.

Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), whose staff produced the study, called the behavior a “bold flaunting” of the GOP-led moratorium on earmarks. She chastised Republican House members for removing documents about earmarks from their Web sites that would have made it easier to identify the practice.

“It was perplexing that so many Republicans had scrubbed their Web sites,” said McCaskill, who on Friday gave copies of the report to the chairman and ranking member of the Armed Services Committee. “If you are going to tout the earmarks you received, why not remain transparent? For me, the entire thing is disappointing. ”

In the analysis, McCaskill’s staff said it found 40 earmark requests from House Republicans and 75 from House Democrats, the report shows. The requests, which target spending to specific projects in a member’s district, were passed over the summer, largely en masse, without public debate.

The report found that 31 other items appeared to be earmarks, but the lack of documentation made it impossible to connect them to specific lawmakers.

On Monday, McCaskill will distribute copies of the 15-page report to the full Armed Services Committee, along with a spreadsheet that names each member who requested the funding.

McCaskill said Friday that she is asking that the conference committee strip out all of the earmarks, which were called “amendments” in the bill. If any remain, she will fight them on the floor of the Senate.

Last week, McCaskill and Sen. Patrick J. Toomey (R-Pa.) introduced a bill that would make earmarks illegal. She said her staff’s findings underscore the need for the legislation.

........

McCaskill said some of the most brazen behavior came from freshmen who, just months before they sought funding for their pet projects, had been on the campaign trail denouncing them.

The report highlights a request from Rep. Robert T. Schilling (R-Ill.), one of the 13 freshmen who sought earmarks, McCaskill said.

The report says Schilling added a $2.5 million earmark for Quad City Manufacturing Lab at the Rock Island Arsenal in Rock Island, Ill., for the “development of innovative manufacturing techniques and process for munitions and weapons systems.”

Schilling’s request matched the language in an earmark to the federal research facility by his predecessor, former representative Phil Hare (D), the report said.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/mccaskill-led-earmark-probe-finds-834-million-in-requests/2011/12/08/gIQAl0MrlO_story.html

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: McCaskill-led earmark probe finds $834 million in r... - 12/12/2011 6:58:07 PM   
erieangel


Posts: 2237
Joined: 6/19/2011
Status: offline
I've never liked this idea of earmarks.  To me, if a pol wants something for his/her district, that pol should be required to introduce a bill requesting the funding and let both Houses debate the merits of the project.  Funding projects by attaching, often unrelated, spending to bills is just a way to bribe for our elected officials to 'bribe' one another into voting for things which they may not normally vote for.  It is just one of the travesties of our political process.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: McCaskill-led earmark probe finds $834 million in r... - 12/13/2011 3:55:13 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
peanut gallery is awful quiet on this I see


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to erieangel)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: McCaskill-led earmark probe finds $834 million in r... - 12/13/2011 4:07:22 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
I'm old enough to remember President Nixon (and just about every president, since) complaining about wanting a line item veto. Sounds like a simple solution to me.

Congress will never pass it, though. Everybody wants their share of the pork. They have to raise so much money to get re-elected that they're more concerned with providing good business deals for the deepest pockets in their district than for voting for what is going to do their constituants the most good. And therein lies the argument for returning elected office to what it started off to be; public service.

Anyway, now that I've told you more than you want to know about ducks ...



Peace and comfort,



Michael


< Message edited by DaddySatyr -- 12/13/2011 4:08:22 AM >


_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: McCaskill-led earmark probe finds $834 million in r... - 12/13/2011 5:33:56 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Of course it is, Lucy. No one can point fingers at the other side on this one.

They all are fucked up... and both sides will remain quiet because, in this, there is no spin.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: McCaskill-led earmark probe finds $834 million in r... - 12/13/2011 7:53:28 AM   
DarkSteven


Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: erieangel

I've never liked this idea of earmarks.  To me, if a pol wants something for his/her district, that pol should be required to introduce a bill requesting the funding and let both Houses debate the merits of the project.  Funding projects by attaching, often unrelated, spending to bills is just a way to bribe for our elected officials to 'bribe' one another into voting for things which they may not normally vote for.  It is just one of the travesties of our political process.


I agree.

The amazing thing is that "without" earmarks, Congress couldn't find a way to pass a spending bill and the government nearly shut down until they managed with incredible fanfare to come up with a compromise bill that deferred actually accomplishing anything.  I cannot believe that they actually had earmarks and still couldn't get anything done.


_____________________________

"You women....

The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs...

Quit fretting. We men love you."

(in reply to erieangel)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: McCaskill-led earmark probe finds $834 million in r... - 12/13/2011 12:43:30 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

I'm old enough to remember President Nixon (and just about every president, since) complaining about wanting a line item veto. Sounds like a simple solution to me.

Congress will never pass it, though. Everybody wants their share of the pork. They have to raise so much money to get re-elected that they're more concerned with providing good business deals for the deepest pockets in their district than for voting for what is going to do their constituants the most good. And therein lies the argument for returning elected office to what it started off to be; public service.

Anyway, now that I've told you more than you want to know about ducks ...



Peace and comfort,



Michael


Hello there Michael.While IM old enough to remember Nixon, I was in a different country, Ive only been folllowing US politics strongly since 2007-8?
I agree with you, I dont believe it will be stopped, as the hypocricy and kickbacks n rewards are far to valuable to give up.
Ducks have watertight asses*just wanted to add to the topic:)*
Peace :)
Lucy


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: McCaskill-led earmark probe finds $834 million in r... - 12/13/2011 2:30:18 PM   
BanthaSamantha


Posts: 261
Joined: 8/7/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

I'm old enough to remember President Nixon (and just about every president, since) complaining about wanting a line item veto. Sounds like a simple solution to me.

Congress will never pass it, though.

Peace and comfort,

Michael




Congress did pass a line-item veto law. The Supreme Court went on to rule it unconstitutional.

Anyways, all a line-item veto law does is pass the buck from pork-seeking Congresspeople to the President.

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: McCaskill-led earmark probe finds $834 million in r... - 12/13/2011 2:33:17 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
NM bantha answered

ETA: "Anyways, all a line-item veto law does is pass the buck from pork-seeking Congresspeople to the President."

He can pass it right back with the veto, and let them override it.



< Message edited by willbeurdaddy -- 12/13/2011 2:35:52 PM >


_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 9
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> McCaskill-led earmark probe finds $834 million in requests Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078