Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Thirty Companies That Spent More In Lobbying Than They Paid In Taxes.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Thirty Companies That Spent More In Lobbying Than They Paid In Taxes. Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Thirty Companies That Spent More In Lobbying Than They ... - 12/14/2011 12:34:53 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline 		Today [Dec 7], thousands of 99 Percenters will march on K Street in Washington, D.C. as a part of an action called “Take Back The Capitol,” taking aim at the lobbying firms that corporate interests use to influence the federal government.

A report released this month by Public Campaign demonstrates just how important it is for Americans to battle corporate special interests and reclaim our democracy. The group’s research finds that thirty big corporations actually spent more money lobbying the federal government between 2008 and 2010 than they spent in taxes. For example, General Electric — one of the top 10 most profitable companies in the world — got a net tax rebate of $4.7 billion during this period. Meanwhile, it spent $84 million lobbying the federal government.

Here’s the full list of the 30 corporations identified and what they paid in federal taxes as opposed to lobbying:

Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Thirty Companies That Spent More In Lobbying Than T... - 12/14/2011 2:18:53 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline 		Something must be wrong here. There is no way all those companies altogether only made $163 billion. No fucking way.

What's mare, I can understand paying NO taxes at all, but what, did they get an earned income credit or something ? Does this mean GE COLLECTED $4.737 billion in tax refunds ? Or is this an assesment of a bunch of things including direct payoffs (incentives) or something like that ?

T^T

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Thirty Companies That Spent More In Lobbying Than T... - 12/14/2011 2:21:15 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline 		Thats profit, after all expenses, including bonuses.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Thirty Companies That Spent More In Lobbying Than T... - 12/14/2011 2:28:53 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		So, I am trying to figure out this 35% taxation and these horrific regulations that leave these corporations so destitute and what an unfriendly clime, hah?

where are the ratpoison republicans to filter this thru their reality-opaque glasses for us? 

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Thirty Companies That Spent More In Lobbying Than T... - 12/14/2011 4:54:58 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

Something must be wrong here. There is no way all those companies altogether only made $163 billion. No fucking way.

What's mare, I can understand paying NO taxes at all, but what, did they get an earned income credit or something ? Does this mean GE COLLECTED $4.737 billion in tax refunds ? Or is this an assesment of a bunch of things including direct payoffs (incentives) or something like that ?

T^T


For 2 of those years they had tax incentives, primarily accelerated depreciation, pushed by Obama as part of the stimulus package.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Thirty Companies That Spent More In Lobbying Than T... - 12/14/2011 5:05:12 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		How much capital equipment fell under that accelerated depreciation, I don't recall the big wave of capital equipment being installed on and since 2009.  I sliced of $5k...but that was startup.  All new all in service in one year.

Believe if it was anything beyond normal we would have read about that.  Big fuckin tax deferral that it was.  If it was in those tables, there were alotta people at work  to get that there.

That they eschew in either case

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 12/14/2011 5:06:16 PM >

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Thirty Companies That Spent More In Lobbying Than T... - 12/14/2011 7:33:04 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline 		And your point is the government doesn't steal enough money ?

I can deal with that.

T^T

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Thirty Companies That Spent More In Lobbying Than T... - 12/14/2011 7:52:39 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline 		i find this reader comment rather interesting, from the actual article (where i found it posted at any rate).

""FedEX shelled out just 1 percent of its profits for the period, well below the minimum corporate tax rate of 35 percent." Anyone can look at FedEx's financial statements and SEC filings and see that this claim is pure fiction that is so far from reality it is pathetic.. It appears the propagandists may be playing a trick by looking at only the "Parent" column on the financial statements, which is basically the equity holding unit, not the operating units where the income earned and taxes incurred are listed. Whatever they cooked this up from, it is clearly an outright lie. Propaganda for the gullible."

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2073743/Revealed-The-30-corporations-spent-lobbyists-taxes-debt-rose-economy-faltered.html#ixzz1gZVawZRl

ahhhh... such is life..

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Thirty Companies That Spent More In Lobbying Than T... - 12/15/2011 6:07:54 AM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

It appears the propagandists may be playing a trick by looking at only the "Parent" column on the financial statements, which is basically the equity holding unit, not the operating units where the income earned and taxes incurred are listed.


Any accountants here care to comment?

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Thirty Companies That Spent More In Lobbying Than T... - 12/15/2011 6:12:49 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline 		Unless I am mistaken, they are saying that the parent is made up of smaller units. Which, if we go by that, then the smaller units had a mix of taxes paid out. Even so, if half the units paid 35%, the other half would have to have paid a negative amount, in other words a huge amount of tax credits for the whole to equal 1%.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Thirty Companies That Spent More In Lobbying Than T... - 12/15/2011 10:07:40 AM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama
quote:

It appears the propagandists may be playing a trick by looking at only the "Parent" column on the financial statements, which is basically the equity holding unit, not the operating units where the income earned and taxes incurred are listed.


Any accountants here care to comment?

I am not an accountant but I would like more proof, either way,.. which to me would be show me where exactly on the financial statements this occurs, I want to see the numbers and it all broken down.. And too, how much tax they pay in other countries depends on what the tax rate in those countries are and the tax system.. Some countries there are tax holidays, if a company is just opening in a new country then there would be the cost of set up etc but no income..

One thing i have read is if the US companies want to bring offshore earned income into the US, then it gets hit with a tax.. which is why they leave the $ offshore instead of investing it in the US.. That is too bad..

Its funny, i read headlines that google was being audited in India cuz the govt there claimed they werent paying all the tax they should be.. I dont know what the outcome was as i have not read further yet (been distracted with other things)...

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Thirty Companies That Spent More In Lobbying Than T... - 12/15/2011 11:06:32 AM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline 		Sorry, I forgot to provide the link: http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2011/12/07/383779/30-big-corporations-taxes-lobbying/

Which included a link: http://publicampaign.org/reports/forhire

Which has a full report link: http://publicampaign.org/sites/default/files/ReportTaxDodgerLobbyingDec6.pdf

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Thirty Companies That Spent More In Lobbying Than T... - 12/15/2011 11:14:07 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


I am not an accountant but I would like more proof, either way,..


Here are two pages from the consolidated 2011 annual report. On the income page the highlighted line shows the total provision for income taxes during the year. That consists of two pieces...current and deferred. Current is the cash payments, deferred is what will be required to be paid in the future, with the deferal coming primarily from Obama's stimuli (as Ive pointed out several times before and is discussed on the income tax footnote page).

The total of current and deferred taxes, the vast majority of which are US Federal taxes, are in excess of 35%. In 2009 there is an 85.6% of income provision for taxes related to "impairment of goodwill". The excess over 35 or 36% can basically be ignored. Its the result of the loss of some prior deductions related to goodwill amortizations under old tax and accounting rules.

Bottom line: Fedex paid or accrued very close to the maximum 35% rate, with the cash payments being about 14% and the stimulus deferrals 21%. Those will be paid in cash over the next 7 to 10 years depending on the useful life of the assets that were purchased. That extra 2-3% of income per year payback of deferrals will in essence be in addition to the 35% rate.

Pics didnt attach...in next 2 posts.

BTW you can get the effective tax rate on the first page just by dividing the income after taxes (highlighted) by the net income before taxes, the line above.



< Message edited by willbeurdaddy -- 12/15/2011 11:20:18 AM >

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Thirty Companies That Spent More In Lobbying Than T... - 12/15/2011 11:15:34 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline 		...





Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Thirty Companies That Spent More In Lobbying Than T... - 12/15/2011 11:16:53 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline 		...




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Thirty Companies That Spent More In Lobbying Than T... - 12/15/2011 11:36:46 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline 		I'm unclear as to whether the results for FedEx (as presented and discussed above) are being said to be typical of all the 30 corporations listed above or whether they should be interpreted on a stand alone basis.

My initial instinct is that they are stand alone. If this is correct, it leaves another 29 corporations to be accounted for.

Also, it appears from the list of 30 corporations' figures that FedEx is the only one to have actually made a positive tax contribution. All the others have minus signs before their figures in the 'taxes paid' column. Which further suggests to me that FedEx ought to be seen as a stand alone case

_____________________________



(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Thirty Companies That Spent More In Lobbying Than T... - 12/15/2011 11:38:01 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		Lower rate due primarily to permanent foreign investments, and provisions for income tax can be and probably are about half due to prior year deferments from the look of it.

Provisions for throwing the tax on a piece of paper and actually paying the fucking tax are two wholly different animals.

They are hauling around a shitload of recent deferred.  I don't see why any company is still allowed in this day and age to haul goodwill around as an asset.  They don't have any.

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 12/15/2011 11:40:45 AM >

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Thirty Companies That Spent More In Lobbying Than T... - 12/15/2011 11:41:04 AM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444
I am not an accountant but I would like more proof, either way,..


Here are two pages from the consolidated 2011 annual report.

I appreciate that, thank you!

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Thirty Companies That Spent More In Lobbying Than T... - 12/15/2011 11:50:06 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Lower rate due primarily to permanent foreign investments, and provisions for income tax can be and probably are about half due to prior year deferments from the look of it.

Provisions for throwing the tax on a piece of paper and actually paying the fucking tax are two wholly different animals.

They are hauling around a shitload of recent deferred.  I don't see why any company is still allowed in this day and age to haul goodwill around as an asset.  They don't have any.

That thought occurred to me to. If they can defer payment into the future, can't they find ways of repeating this process indefinitely? Find various excuses to continually roll over the nett deferred? Is that what you are getting at?

And yes I queried what 'goodwill' and 'impairment to goodwill' mean - do their meanings here have any relationship to their meanings in everyday English? On what basis is the 'goodwill' of a multinational corporation estimated? Is there a relevant accounting standard? Isn't any goodwill value more properly represented in the share price?

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 12/15/2011 11:55:43 AM >

_____________________________



(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Thirty Companies That Spent More In Lobbying Than T... - 12/15/2011 11:53:07 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		Like Coca Cola, they have the name recognition, and they can borrow against that and so on, that's goodwill, you would pay more for a Coke than you would for say a Strangleberry Soda.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Thirty Companies That Spent More In Lobbying Than They Paid In Taxes. Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109