Hippiekinkster -> RE: TSA Arrests Doctor for Reciting 4th Amendment (12/25/2011 3:21:59 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr While it may be a stretch, interfering with a flight has been a crime for over 40 years (Jim Morrison was arrested on that charge, once). I think that technically, that is what this person was doing (causing a delay could be seen as interference). So, while the author may want to spin that they were arrested for exercising their right to free speech, what they were doing was nothing more than being a pain in the ass. Now, I am a strong proponent for free speech and I think we've lost too much of that right, already. I think this person could have made a better point (about freedom of speech) if they had recited the fourth amendment while doing as directed at the security station. Of course, I don't think they would have been arrested. I have been a bit miffed and said: "What do you mean 'extra screening'?" while moving to do as instructed and never had an issue raised. quote:
ORIGINAL: soul2share And for the conspiracy thoerists out there....bunk! I'm all for civil liberties and not getting my rights violated, but I've learned that if you fly, you're going to have to go thru the security crap. It's not perfect, there have been people that have gotten thru, and thank goodness, their attempts to bring down a plane failed, but gone are the days when we can just trust everyone coming into an airport. I still can't believe how stupid this woman was. This'll leave me shaking my head for a few hours. The libertarian in me says: Why can't we have flights where we are not subjected to these searches, etc. as an alternative for people that don't want to endure what we consider to be illegal searches. Yes, we understand we wouldn't be as safe. Yes, we understand we'd be risking our lives. I don't know that the extra measures we're enduring now have actually prevented attacks from any but the truly lazy, anyway. I think it is the very thing that famous Ben Franklin quote speaks to. We've given up a little liberty and I don't feel a whole lot more secure. I guess we got what we deserve. Peace and comfort, Michael Well, certainly the author spins her experience, but her larger point about the de facto repeal of the 4thA is, IMO, spot on. Her point about the vanishingly small chance of being in some sort of airborne attack is also true. The point of diminishing returns was reached a long time ago, I think, with the nonsense about removing shoes. I'd guess that it would be a whole lot cheaper for the airlines to give out paper slippers at check-in, and scan the shoes like all other carry-ons. I agree with Michael's last paragraph. It's not possible to ensure security with 100% certainty. In attempting to do so, the majority who support such measures have taken away MY 4thA rights.
|
|
|
|