RE: Tin hat huh?

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Tin hat huh?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Tin hat huh?

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Tin hat huh? - 12/29/2011 9:39:49 AM

DomKen

Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

The only really big deal on that list is the guatemalan experiments and they occured in the 1940's. Its sad and disgusting that mdeical researchers back then did them but I fail to see how it justifies any conspiracy nonsense. This was never even a rumor until it was brought to light last year so clearly it was never part of any sort of conspiracy claim.

(in reply to Musicmystery)

Profile

Post #: 21

RE: Tin hat huh? - 12/29/2011 10:23:35 AM

Lucylastic

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

Love how the right jump to blaming obama, these are not new.Some are more rational than others, they are in the business of selling books and overpriced minerals and powders
they should have as a logo
Our Magical balm will cure all your ills
it cures coughs, colds, sore holes.
It will make you dart, fart pull a cart and shit bars of cadburys(an old snake oil ditty from the UK)

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to DomKen)

Profile

Post #: 22

RE: Tin hat huh? - 12/29/2011 12:32:09 PM

Kirata

Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GotSteel

Yeah, start going off about "Big Pharma" that's exactly the sort of thing that's sure to convince that we're not in tin foil hat land.

Big Pharma Spends More On Advertising Than Research And Development, Study Finds ~Tin Foil Hat Digest
Big Pharma's New Business Model ~Tin Foil Hat Street Journal
Super-Duper Hydrocodone? An Open Letter to Big Pharma ~Tin Foil Hat Magazine

K.

< Message edited by Kirata -- 12/29/2011 1:27:52 PM >

(in reply to GotSteel)

Profile

Post #: 23

RE: Tin hat huh? - 12/29/2011 2:23:01 PM

Termyn8or

Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline

quote:

was never even a rumor until it was brought to light last year

LOL. Just LOL.

T^T

(in reply to DomKen)

Profile

Post #: 24

RE: Tin hat huh? - 12/29/2011 2:49:20 PM

heartcream

Posts: 3044
Joined: 5/9/2007
From: Psychoalphadiscobetabioaquadoloop
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

Here are the top ten conspiracy facts that emerged over the last year:

Who decided this? Seems an arbitrary self-serving promotional piece.

What top ten list isnt?

_____________________________

"Exaggerate the essential, leave the obvious vague." Vincent Van Gogh

I'd Rather Be With You

Every single line means something.
Jean-Michel Basquiat

(in reply to Musicmystery)

Profile

Post #: 25

RE: Tin hat huh? - 12/29/2011 6:14:07 PM

kalikshama

Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline

2011 was the year in which many conspiracy "theories" became conspiracy FACTS. Articles that used to earn you a tinfoil hat designation suddenly were front-page news stories across the country. The world is stranger than we can imagine, it seems, and 2011 proved it yet again.

Here are the top ten conspiracy facts that emerged over the last year:

(see OP)

(in reply to heartcream)

Profile

Post #: 26

RE: Tin hat huh? - 12/29/2011 11:27:15 PM

Termyn8or

Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline

ETA FR

Not just that, shit,,,, we been through that.

But as DK proved, we are not told of everything, how much else do you think is going on ? They overtly say now that they have weapons to quell a rebellion using ultrasound and what the fuckever, that they have and will continue toi kill foreign leaders at will and install their puppetts and that you have no fucking right to say a goddamn thing about it.

How much more do you need to get your head out your ass and AT THE VERY LEAST stop buying their junk ? I mean from their buddies in China. They ain't OUR buddies, that is for fucking sure and that means all of them.

Note that at least one member thinks all that shit is just fine except for one item. How many items might be objectionable to you ? THEY say double blind studies are unethical, but THEY do them and don't even give us the results.

What kind of "people" are they to do this, and more importantly what are we to put up with it ?

T^T

< Message edited by Termyn8or -- 12/29/2011 11:29:54 PM >

(in reply to kalikshama)

Profile

Post #: 27