FrostedFlake
Posts: 3084
Joined: 3/4/2009 From: Centralia, Washington Status: offline
|
quote:
Velonews Five Tours de France. Five Giri d’Italia. Three world pro road championships. (In 1974, the year he entered only 140 races – hah! – and won only 38 of them for a 27-percent winning average, he took the hat-trick and won all three of these majors.) Seven Milan-San Remos. Two Tours of Flanders. Three Paris-Roubaix. Five Liège-Bastogne-Lièges. Two Amstel Gold Races. The hour record, in 1972 – a year in which he also won the Tour and the Giro, along with five major classics and 43 other races. His trophy shelf groans with iron from three Ghent-Wevelgems, three Flèche Wallonnes, three Paris-Nices, three Baracchi Trophies, six Montjuich Hill Climbs. Among others.His strength and endurance are legendary, but Merckx had no weaknesses as a sprinter, climber or time trialist, either. He holds the record for the most days in the Giro leader’s pink jersey, at 78, and the Tour’s yellow jersey, at 96. He’s the only rider to have won the Tour-Giro double three times. He won six Giro time trials. He won the Tour both overall and on points – the yellow jersey and the green jersey – three times, in 1969, ’71 and ’72. He holds the record for most stage wins in a single Tour, eight, and he did that twice, in ’70 and ’74 (and he won six stages in ’69 and again in ’72). Just to round out the collection, Merckx also won the King of the Mountains polka-dot jersey in ’69 and ’70. He did all this in epic battles against great riders, some of whom rank among the greatest athletes the sport has produced. Against Jacques Anquetil, against Felice Gimondi, against Luis Ocaña, Raymond Poulidor, Bernard Thévenet, Rik Van Looy, Joop Zoetemelk, Merckx battled and won – not just won, but decimated them, broke their will, crushed them totally and left them pedaling feebly in the thin vapor of his trail. “In those days, the big names didn’t ride to win,” says Zoetemelk. “First there was Merckx, and then another classification began behind him.” If your theory does not fit Eddie Merckx, It has been falsified. Do not overlook his accident. Every race he rode since the late sixties was painfilled because of that accident, winning despite this curse, not because of it. While we are here, lets watch Ned Overend in a field of 2500 riders at 56 years old last May. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjJqcq5BROs That was boring. Wasn't it. Like Merckx, there is Ned, and then there is everyone else. Doubt? Check this out. Here is Ned on Mount Washington in 2011. Where is anyone else? http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=IEJezhsxe-Q Here Ned addresses, "The capacity to suffer for four months a year". Is he talking about enjoying it? http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=wmjLuBrxn4s Again, if Ned doesn't fit your theory, it isn't one. And I? ...Rode 50 miles on Christmas day... in the rain. Yes, I could have avoided it. And I am pretty sure you would have avoided it, whatever the weather. My longest day was 109 miles, last August. Apartment hunting. Neither of these rides hurt, excepting my fanny. I don't ride at a suffering pace, I ride to get where I am going. Draw from this what you will. But I don't think I fit your theory either. I think what you have is not a theory but a series of observations about individuals. Postscript : Woman wanted. Whips and chains required. Inquire within.
_____________________________
Frosted Flake simul justus et peccator Einen Liebhaber, und halten Sie die Schraube "... evil (and hilarious) !!" Hlen5
|