Cons: Time to rally around a not-Romney....Ouch!!

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

Cons: Time to rally around a not-Romney....Ouch!!

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Cons: Time to rally around a not-Romney....Ouch!!

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Login

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Cons: Time to rally around a not-Romney....Ouch!! - 1/5/2012 6:37:06 PM

Owner59

Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline

"Prominent conservative leaders want their rank and file to quickly get behind a single presidential candidate — Rick Santorum now seems the likeliest — fearful that persistent splits will help Mitt Romney win the Republican nomination.

"While no political candidate, or human being for that matter, is perfect, Rick Santorum's baggage contains his clothes," CatholicVote.org president Brian Burch said Thursday, after Santorum's virtual tie with Romney in Iowa won the support of the 600,000-member online organization.

"Republicans hoping to win back the White House in November must unite behind the candidate most dedicated to the foundational issues of faith, family and freedom."

Romney narrowly won the Iowa caucuses when conservative voters split their support among several challengers, and the worry is that the same thing will happen in South Carolina, Florida and beyond if Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry all stay in the race.

"Conservatives are still divided among a number of different candidates, but the field is winnowing," said former Republican presidential candidate Gary Bauer. And, he said: "I certainly think that Senator Santorum is in a good position to inherit a lot of that support."

http://news.yahoo.com/conservatives-time-rally-around-not-romney-203635123.html

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

Post #: 1

RE: Cons: Time to rally around a not-Romney....Ouch!! - 1/5/2012 6:43:49 PM

erieangel

Posts: 2237
Joined: 6/19/2011
Status: offline

When JFK was running for president, people were afraid he would become the Pope's puppet in the US. Why is nobody concerned about that now?

(in reply to Owner59)

Post #: 2

RE: Cons: Time to rally around a not-Romney....Ouch!! - 1/5/2012 8:01:13 PM

Musicmystery

Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

Rick Santorum's baggage contains his clothes

Impressive qualifications.

(in reply to Owner59)

Post #: 3

RE: Cons: Time to rally around a not-Romney....Ouch!! - 1/5/2012 8:25:46 PM

DarkSteven

Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: erieangel

When JFK was running for president, people were afraid he would become the Pope's puppet in the US. Why is nobody concerned about that now?

Not much choice. Huntsman and Romney are Mormons, and Santorum and Gingrich are Catholics. Perry and Paul are the only alternatives still in the race.

_____________________________

"You women....

The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs...

Quit fretting. We men love you."

(in reply to erieangel)

Post #: 4

RE: Cons: Time to rally around a not-Romney....Ouch!! - 1/6/2012 12:52:16 AM

Hillwilliam

Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline

"Republicans hoping to win back the White House in November must unite behind the candidate most dedicated to the foundational issues of faith, family and freedom."

All together now folks

IT'S THE ECONOMY STUPID!!!!!!!

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to DarkSteven)

Post #: 5

RE: Cons: Time to rally around a not-Romney....Ouch!! - 1/6/2012 1:11:56 AM

erieangel

Posts: 2237
Joined: 6/19/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

quote:

ORIGINAL: erieangel

When JFK was running for president, people were afraid he would become the Pope's puppet in the US. Why is nobody concerned about that now?

Not much choice. Huntsman and Romney are Mormons, and Santorum and Gingrich are Catholics. Perry and Paul are the only alternatives still in the race.

Actually, I think it has much more to do with the fact that many evangelicals have adopted Catholic dogma.

(in reply to DarkSteven)

Post #: 6

RE: Cons: Time to rally around a not-Romney....Ouch!! - 1/6/2012 5:11:17 AM

Moonhead

Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

They certainly don't like birth control any more than Pope Adolph does...

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to erieangel)

Post #: 7

RE: Cons: Time to rally around a not-Romney....Ouch!! - 1/6/2012 7:12:35 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

What happend to Scott Walker for President or Scott Brown for President.

They are all the republican rage. Why not get a loser you can live with?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to Moonhead)

Post #: 8

RE: Cons: Time to rally around a not-Romney....Ouch!! - 1/6/2012 7:25:27 AM

Moonhead

Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

Scott Walker? I loved Scott 4...

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to mnottertail)

Post #: 9

RE: Cons: Time to rally around a not-Romney....Ouch!! - 1/6/2012 8:26:52 AM

Lucylastic

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

Isnt Brown in the doghouse now?

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Moonhead)

Post #: 10

RE: Cons: Time to rally around a not-Romney....Ouch!! - 1/6/2012 8:35:16 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

Yeah, as so often happens, turns out he aint a REAL republican. They get caught in that alot.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to Lucylastic)

Post #: 11

RE: Cons: Time to rally around a not-Romney....Ouch!! - 1/6/2012 8:37:15 AM

Lucylastic

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

Well thats the excuse they will use if Romney wins the candidacy. For sure.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to mnottertail)

Post #: 12

RE: Cons: Time to rally around a not-Romney....Ouch!! - 1/6/2012 8:38:01 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

Why are the teabaggers so afraid to front a REAL republican?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to Lucylastic)

Post #: 13

RE: Cons: Time to rally around a not-Romney....Ouch!! - 1/6/2012 8:55:45 AM

cuckoldmepls

Posts: 855
Joined: 11/29/2007
Status: offline

The answer to your question is that the general population has been brainwashed to believe that more government is the answer. I believe we've already had $15 trillion too much government haven't we? Most people will not vote for a true conservative including myself. Although social security is technically unconstitutional, I want it for myself someday too. The bottom line is this. We can't afford big government, social security medicare medicaid, and a strong national defense. Of the 3, I would eliminate big government.

Btw, if you want to get under evangelical leaders skins. I would support Romney. It will drive them nutts.

(in reply to mnottertail)

Post #: 14

RE: Cons: Time to rally around a not-Romney....Ouch!! - 1/6/2012 8:58:57 AM

Lucylastic

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

Personally I think they are using the wrong set of dictionaries for their definitions
They should stop using the drama llama version as seen often wandering these halls.
They are republican but not conservative enough to be teapartiers, or too conservative bordering on batshit, then batshitinsane then fundy right
A bit like them not knowing the difference between liberal, democrat, socialist, marxist, leninist, communist etc etc *they never get those right either:)
But hey thats just my POV

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to mnottertail)

Post #: 15

RE: Cons: Time to rally around a not-Romney....Ouch!! - 1/6/2012 10:21:25 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

How is Social Security 'technically' illegal? Any credible 'technically' illegally oriented citations on that?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to Lucylastic)

Post #: 16

RE: Cons: Time to rally around a not-Romney....Ouch!! - 1/6/2012 10:29:58 AM

cuckoldmepls

Posts: 855
Joined: 11/29/2007
Status: offline

Ever heard of the 10th amendment?

"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

This means that 90% of the laws and agencies Congress has passed and created are unconstitutional. Which explains why we are $15 trillion in debt.

(in reply to mnottertail)

Post #: 17

RE: Cons: Time to rally around a not-Romney....Ouch!! - 1/6/2012 10:35:44 AM

cuckoldmepls

Posts: 855
Joined: 11/29/2007
Status: offline

Where they are confusing you brainiacs is they go ahead and pass laws and create agencies that apply to all the states, then after the fact, they say it falls under the ICC clause.

i.e., they are doing things that are unconstitutional in the first place, then claiming it falls under the ICC clause after they passed the law or created the agency.

(in reply to cuckoldmepls)

Post #: 18

RE: Cons: Time to rally around a not-Romney....Ouch!! - 1/6/2012 10:35:46 AM

Lucylastic

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

RON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
dont tempt him

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to cuckoldmepls)

Post #: 19

RE: Cons: Time to rally around a not-Romney....Ouch!! - 1/6/2012 10:38:57 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

Yeah, so you dont have anything on it as I was pretty much assured of out of the gate.

You might go see Music Mystery since he is an english teacher and slip him some decent bucks and have him diagram this sentence for ya:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

In doing so, you may come to a conclusion of the meaning of that clause, which you do not hold at present, apparently thinking it an artifact from some other constitution of some other planet.

In a representative government, for better or worse, your elected representatives are vox humana, but moreso vox populi.

Nux Vomica

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 1/6/2012 10:43:27 AM >

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to cuckoldmepls)

Post #: 20

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Cons: Time to rally around a not-Romney....Ouch!!

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Jump to:

New Messages	No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages	Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages	Locked w/o New Messages

Post New Thread

Reply to Message

Post New Poll

Submit Vote

Delete My Own Post

Delete My Own Thread

Rate Posts

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.109