Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Possible rhetorical question, but...


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Possible rhetorical question, but... Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Possible rhetorical question, but... - 1/14/2012 1:18:25 PM   
Fightdirecto


Posts: 1101
Joined: 8/3/2004
Status: offline
Almost every GOP presidential candidate says they want "smaller government" and "less government intrusion" -

BUT -

At least one GOP presidential candidate (Santorum) wants to overturn the SCOTUS ruling in Griswold v. Connecticut and ban all forms of contraception - even those forms used by married hetrosexual couples.

How can you make sure married hetrosexual couples aren't using any form of contraception (other than the "rhythm method") without government intrusion into a married hetrosexual couple's home/bedroom?

And, if you allow the police to enter married hetrosexual couples' homes to make sure that married hetrosexual couples are not using contraceptives, would it not follow that you would also allow the police to enter married hetrosexual couples' homes to make sure that married hetrosexual couples are not using floggers/handcuffs/a St. Andrew's Cross/etc.?

How can you reconcile "smaller government" and "less government intrusion" with a federal ban on all forms of contraception, enforced by the local/state/federal police?

_____________________________

"I swore never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation. We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.””
- Ellie Wiesel
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Possible rhetorical question, but... - 1/14/2012 1:28:44 PM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
So wrong so many ways.

Santorum has never indicated that he wants to outlaw contraception. Period.

The idea that Griswold was wrongly decided not because it involved contraception but because it expanded federal powers may be beyond you.

_____________________________

1. Islam and sharia are indivisible.
2. Sharia is barbaric, homophobic, violent, and inimical to the most basic Western values (including free speech and freedom of religion). (Yeah, I know: SEE: Irony 101).
ERGO: Islam has no place in America.

(in reply to Fightdirecto)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Possible rhetorical question, but... - 1/14/2012 3:46:23 PM   
erieangel


Posts: 2237
Joined: 6/19/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

So wrong so many ways.

Santorum has never indicated that he wants to outlaw contraception. Period.

The idea that Griswold was wrongly decided not because it involved contraception but because it expanded federal powers may be beyond you.


Griswold did not expand federal powers over the state, what it did was expand PERSONAL powers over the intrusion of the state.


(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Possible rhetorical question, but... - 1/14/2012 3:50:57 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
Free the heavy hands of government from keeping businesses from ripping us off or ruining our water/air/soil only to place them in our bedrooms and in our personal lives.

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to erieangel)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Possible rhetorical question, but... - 1/14/2012 4:21:57 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
Santorum: States Should Have The Right To Outlaw Birth Control

Rick Santorum reiterated his belief that states should have the right to outlaw contraception during an interview with ABC News yesterday, saying, “The state has a right to do that, I have never questioned that the state has a right to do that. It is not a constitutional right, the state has the right to pass whatever statues they have.” Watch the Jake Tapper interview:

video

Santorum has long opposed the Supreme Court’s 1965 ruling “that invalidated a Connecticut law banning contraception” and has also pledged to completely defund federal funding for contraception if elected president. As he told CaffeinatedThoughts.com editor Shane Vander Hart in October, “One of the things I will talk about, that no president has talked about before, is I think the dangers of contraception in this country,” the former Pennsylvania senator explained. “It’s not okay. It’s a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be.”

But an overwhelming majority of Americans — virtually all women (more than 99 percent ) aged 15–44 have used at least one contraceptive method — rely on contraceptives to prevent unintended pregnancies and limit the spread of sexually-transmitted diseases. In fact, the Guttmacher Institute estimates that contraceptive services provided at publicly funded clinics helped prevent almost two million unintended pregnancies. Without funding from Medicaid and Title X, “abortions occurring in the United States would be nearly two-thirds higher among women overall and among teens; the number of unintended pregnancies among poor women would nearly double.”

(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Possible rhetorical question, but... - 1/14/2012 4:23:59 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

So wrong so many ways.

Santorum has never indicated that he wants to outlaw contraception. Period.

The idea that Griswold was wrongly decided not because it involved contraception but because it expanded federal powers may be beyond you.


The federal government prevented states from exercising their religious views upon women by not allowing the state to determine if a woman can have a safe form of birth control.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Possible rhetorical question, but... - 1/14/2012 5:19:27 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

Santorum: States Should Have The Right To Outlaw Birth Control

Rick Santorum reiterated his belief that states should have the right to outlaw contraception during an interview with ABC News yesterday, saying, “The state has a right to do that, I have never questioned that the state has a right to do that. It is not a constitutional right, the state has the right to pass whatever statues they have.” Watch the Jake Tapper interview:

video

Santorum has long opposed the Supreme Court’s 1965 ruling “that invalidated a Connecticut law banning contraception” and has also pledged to completely defund federal funding for contraception if elected president. As he told CaffeinatedThoughts.com editor Shane Vander Hart in October, “One of the things I will talk about, that no president has talked about before, is I think the dangers of contraception in this country,” the former Pennsylvania senator explained. “It’s not okay. It’s a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be.”

But an overwhelming majority of Americans — virtually all women (more than 99 percent ) aged 15–44 have used at least one contraceptive method — rely on contraceptives to prevent unintended pregnancies and limit the spread of sexually-transmitted diseases. In fact, the Guttmacher Institute estimates that contraceptive services provided at publicly funded clinics helped prevent almost two million unintended pregnancies. Without funding from Medicaid and Title X, “abortions occurring in the United States would be nearly two-thirds higher among women overall and among teens; the number of unintended pregnancies among poor women would nearly double.”

I couldnt say anything .... nice, so I left the troll dangling.
Thankyou ladies (Kali and Tazzy) for doing it nicely:)

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Possible rhetorical question, but... - 1/14/2012 5:29:11 PM   
Notsweet


Posts: 873
Joined: 6/11/2006
Status: offline
Although it's true that the citizens of each state should decide what they want for themselves, and not the federal government, Santorum is still a fucking nightmare. His ideas regarding social conservativism make me scream. And people assume that what comes out of his crazy face is what all conservatives think. I cringe whenever I see him.
But the one thing he's right about--and maybe this a bit of the anarchist in me--the states have GOT to make their own choices, and not have the federal government sucking money out of them, then giving it back and telling them what to do with it. What Congress knows about the needs of any one state could dance on the head of a pin.

Thing about power going to Washington...it doesn't come back where we can see and decide on it locally. But that's where we have to live with it.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Possible rhetorical question, but... - 1/14/2012 5:41:28 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Some states give... others get from the Federal Government. 32 get more than thy give

New Mexico  $2.03  1 
Mississippi $2.02  2 
Alaska  $1.84  3 
Louisiana $1.78  4 
West Virginia  $1.76  5 
North Dakota  $1.68  6 
Alabama  $1.66  7 
South Dakota  $1.53  8 
Kentucky  $1.51  9 
Virginia  $1.51  10 
Montana  $1.47  11 
Hawaii $1.44  12 
Maine  $1.41  13 
Arkansas  $1.41  14 
Oklahoma  $1.36  15 
South Carolina  $1.35  16 
Missouri $1.32  17 
Maryland $1.30  18 
Tennessee $1.27  19 
Idaho  $1.21  20 
Arizona $1.19  21 
Kansas  $1.12  22 
Wyoming  $1.11  23 
Iowa  $1.10  24 
Nebraska  $1.10  25 
Vermont  $1.08  26 
North Carolina  $1.08  27 
Pennsylvania  $1.07  28 
Utah  $1.07  29 
Indiana  $1.05  30 
Ohio  $1.05  31 
Georgia  $1.01  32 
Rhode Island $1.00  33

http://www.taxfoundation.org/files/fedspend_per_taxesbystate-20071009.pdf

< Message edited by tazzygirl -- 1/14/2012 5:42:03 PM >


_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Notsweet)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Possible rhetorical question, but... - 1/14/2012 6:00:38 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Notsweet

Although it's true that the citizens of each state should decide what they want for themselves, and not the federal government, Santorum is still a fucking nightmare. His ideas regarding social conservativism make me scream. And people assume that what comes out of his crazy face is what all conservatives think. I cringe whenever I see him.
But the one thing he's right about--and maybe this a bit of the anarchist in me--the states have GOT to make their own choices, and not have the federal government sucking money out of them, then giving it back and telling them what to do with it. What Congress knows about the needs of any one state could dance on the head of a pin.

Thing about power going to Washington...it doesn't come back where we can see and decide on it locally. But that's where we have to live with it.

making the assumption that we cannot tell the difference between santorum, perry, cain, romney, Paul, bachmann or any republican/conservative/rightie. is insulting, but I guess thats ok huh

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Notsweet)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Possible rhetorical question, but... - 1/14/2012 6:02:49 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
The only one that has any true potential is Paul, imo... and even that is scary. Its not that he doesnt have great ideas... he does. He also has some that are so whacked out that the good cant outweigh them.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Possible rhetorical question, but... - 1/14/2012 6:21:19 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

The only one that has any true potential is Paul, imo... and even that is scary. Its not that he doesnt have great ideas... he does. He also has some that are so whacked out that the good cant outweigh them.

I dislike many many of his views, however, having watched 90 % of the debates and done a lot of background research, he has some excellent ideas. but I couldnt vote for him EVER
but then I feel the same way about all of the candidates.
I liked Huntsman too, but again on deal breakers i have I couldnt vote for him either.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Possible rhetorical question, but... - 1/14/2012 8:04:51 PM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Griswold did not expand federal powers over the state, what it did was expand PERSONAL powers over the intrusion of the state.


Griswold first created the "right to privacy" and then used the power of the federal gummint to force the states to respect it.
Yeah, that's not an expansion of federal powers.
If they created the requirement to go about in public armed with a firearm, that would be an expansion of personal power.

_____________________________

1. Islam and sharia are indivisible.
2. Sharia is barbaric, homophobic, violent, and inimical to the most basic Western values (including free speech and freedom of religion). (Yeah, I know: SEE: Irony 101).
ERGO: Islam has no place in America.

(in reply to erieangel)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Possible rhetorical question, but... - 1/14/2012 8:08:02 PM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Rick Santorum reiterated his belief that states should have the right to outlaw contraception


Your quote is correct (and so is Santorum).
The OP is wrong.
Santorum has never said that he "wants to... ban all forms of contraception".

_____________________________

1. Islam and sharia are indivisible.
2. Sharia is barbaric, homophobic, violent, and inimical to the most basic Western values (including free speech and freedom of religion). (Yeah, I know: SEE: Irony 101).
ERGO: Islam has no place in America.

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Possible rhetorical question, but... - 1/14/2012 8:51:57 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Which form does he want to ban? You forget he is a strict Catholic. Any form, other than rhythm and withdrawal, are forbidden.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Possible rhetorical question, but... - 1/14/2012 9:50:29 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
He stated that in a video...
I am not a believer in birth control artificial birth control , being able to do what you wanna do without having any responsibility.
He also stated, its harmful to women, its harmful to the country, etc etc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MBO9tNNejo

so you are right, he didnt state he wanted to ban all forms, hes fine with the "natural ones"



rambling thought before bed
Id love to see how long that lasted if women sued every time they got pregnant by accident
of course with my plan , it wouldnt be an issue.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Possible rhetorical question, but... - 1/14/2012 9:51:53 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
But, of course, it was perfectly fine for him to consider abortion when his wife's life was in questionable risk

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Possible rhetorical question, but... - 1/14/2012 9:55:21 PM   
Notsweet


Posts: 873
Joined: 6/11/2006
Status: offline
I'm sorry--what?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Notsweet

Although it's true that the citizens of each state should decide what they want for themselves, and not the federal government, Santorum is still a fucking nightmare. His ideas regarding social conservativism make me scream. And people assume that what comes out of his crazy face is what all conservatives think. I cringe whenever I see him.
But the one thing he's right about--and maybe this a bit of the anarchist in me--the states have GOT to make their own choices, and not have the federal government sucking money out of them, then giving it back and telling them what to do with it. What Congress knows about the needs of any one state could dance on the head of a pin.

Thing about power going to Washington...it doesn't come back where we can see and decide on it locally. But that's where we have to live with it.

making the assumption that we cannot tell the difference between santorum, perry, cain, romney, Paul, bachmann or any republican/conservative/rightie. is insulting, but I guess thats ok huh

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Possible rhetorical question, but... - 1/14/2012 9:58:15 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
And people assume that what comes out of his crazy face is what all conservatives think.

Lucy's response...

making the assumption that we cannot tell the difference between santorum, perry, cain, romney, Paul, bachmann or any republican/conservative/rightie. is insulting, but I guess thats ok huh

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Notsweet)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Possible rhetorical question, but... - 1/14/2012 10:08:08 PM   
Notsweet


Posts: 873
Joined: 6/11/2006
Status: offline
Oh, so you're saying that that IS what all conservatives think.
I see.
What am I thinking now?

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

And people assume that what comes out of his crazy face is what all conservatives think.

Lucy's response...

making the assumption that we cannot tell the difference between santorum, perry, cain, romney, Paul, bachmann or any republican/conservative/rightie. is insulting, but I guess thats ok huh

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Possible rhetorical question, but... Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.086