Romney didn't win Iowa

Romney didn't win Iowa (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Hillwilliam -> Romney didn't win Iowa (1/19/2012 5:22:33 AM)
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/santorum-may-won-iowa-romney-calls-results-virtual-123742689.html Party now declares it a tie after some new Santorum votes 'show up'. Why am I not surprised?

Lucylastic -> RE: Romney didn't win Iowa (1/19/2012 5:33:41 AM)
and they think they should be taken seriously..... why???? missing votes? oooookay [8\|] pull the other one its plays rule brittania santorum imbibers are gonna love this

DarkSteven -> RE: Romney didn't win Iowa (1/19/2012 8:32:19 AM)
Who cares? It's NOT a winner-take-all. This does not affect the number of delegates each receives. I find no difference between Romney winning by either votes and Santorum winning by 32 or whatever. It's a tie for all practical purposes.

joether -> RE: Romney didn't win Iowa (1/19/2012 3:07:44 PM)
quote: (fromt the article) But Republican officials told the paper that votes from eight precincts are missing and will never be certified so the party is expected to render a "split decision." The Iowa Republican Party is expected to make the official announcement later this morning. Anyone want to take bets thoee eight precincts voted in favor of Mr. Romney?

BanthaSamantha -> RE: Romney didn't win Iowa (1/19/2012 3:13:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DarkSteven Who cares? It's NOT a winner-take-all. This does not affect the number of delegates each receives. I find no difference between Romney winning by either votes and Santorum winning by 32 or whatever. It's a tie for all practical purposes. There is a quirk with how they deal out the votes here. Even though they might have effectively tied, Santorum will still receive one more delegate than Romney.

MasterSlaveLA -> RE: Romney didn't win Iowa (1/19/2012 3:17:33 PM)
Eh... doesn't matter. (shrugs)

Page: [1]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

3.076172E-02