njlauren
Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SpiritedRadiance Again I ask, how is a doms failure the submissives fault In your example "Would mistress like to spank me" Its not topping from the bottomĀ Its the doms job to say No, i would not stop asking, if they dont ... its not the subs fault. A Doms lacking is often pushed on the submissive for what ever stupid reason they can think of topping from the bottom is only saying the dominants lacking, they are a failure, they have the issues They have not created a dynamic in which its clear whos in control and whos not... not the submissive...They have not created a clear dynamic in which asking for something is frowned upon, its their fault... they havent made it clear that things are done only their way, that again isnt the subs fault... I am not blaming anyone, I am talking about a behavior, not whose fault it is. The underlying issue, to me, is a sub/bottom, who rather then leaving it to the top to determine the course of action in play to mutually meet their needs, is in effect directing the top to do "what turns me on" [the bottom]. In a sense, when you do a pro domme session it is topping from the bottom a lot of the time, because the clients generally come in, give them a laundry list of what they like to do, and expect to get it (it varies, obviously, depending on the client/domme and the nature of how they work). If it does go on, it is the fault of both, it is a sub/bottom who isn't seeing what is going on as 'us', with the top controlling what goes, but rather 'the top' 'doing him/her', and it is the top's fault for allowing it. Topping from the bottom to me is a sub trying to get what they want and in effect using the top, rather then creating something the both get off on, YMMV. BTW, for this conversation I am using bottom/sub the same way even though they generally mean different things.
< Message edited by njlauren -- 1/28/2012 7:10:20 PM >
|