Anaxagoras
Posts: 3086
Joined: 5/9/2009 From: Eire Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: defiantbadgirl quote:
ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras I don't think his relationship history should be a factor one way or another. He seems to have an unpleasant character which is of course a problem for the election but it leads to the question as to whether it should be so based on character. Any political office is first and foremost a job, and if any employer discriminated against a prospective employee based on their personal life it could potentially be a legal matter - not sure exactly what the law is there in the US but I assume there is some sort of law appertaining to that issue. There are differences when it comes to voting of course but the principle remains the same - that you should evaluate people solely in relation to their potential to do the job well. Being a Narcissist or Sociopath would affect his ability to do the job well. Do you think someone with no conscience should be commander in chief of the US military? AFAIK narcissm is a fairly mildish personality defect so don't think it would necessarily hamper a given person's ability to do the job well, if they are otherwise experienced politicians. Being a sociopath is a different matter, and as you rightly say, such a person shouldn't be head of the US military but when one is talking about a serious mental illness that would be a pretty major claim that would require verification by professionals. Someone who seems like a socio may just be a callous individual. BTW I didn't mean to indicate my post was directly in reply to yours - I should have stated "FR".
< Message edited by Anaxagoras -- 1/29/2012 9:54:57 PM >
_____________________________
"That woman, as nature has created her, and man at present is educating her, is man's enemy. She can only be his slave or his despot, but never his companion." (Venus in Furs)
|