quote:

ORIGINAL: CruelandKindSdst

The whole concept of a person being a combination of male and female is a total fallicy perpetuated originally by a women that was pushing men to be more like women.. Her assumptions were extremely flawed and are even worse now.
 
Science has shown through neurological examination, MRI recorded experiments, as well as genetic studies recently completed that her ideas  were nothing but conjecture.
 
It is easy to see though, how this became popular... in the 60's when this originally got started by the liberal feminist it sold thousands of books... to women. The Masses wanted to believe that this was true... so through mass marketing, it sold books and caught on in the politically correct venues of pop psychology... the only minor problem was that there was not any substantiation to go along with it. (That means that the whole idea was plucked out of her ass because that is what she wanted men to be like.)
 
One regular and extremely wrong example used by women to justify this logical travesty in common sense is to point out if you cry or if you are sensitive or any other "Behavior" that is assigned to women is exhibited by men, then it is obvious that this is the female side of a man... visa versa. That my friend is not logic, it is emotional rationality... and a total lie!!
 
The whole aspect of male/female function was based upon behaviors... not science. It was assumed that femininity was equated to crying, softness, nurturing, grouping, being irrational and so forth... and that to be masculine was to be strong, cold, hard, aggressive, and so forth....   Again this whole line of rational thinking was totally flawed in the first place.
 
What has been discovered is that each gender has it's own version of how it feels, how it operates under different stimuli, etc... A masculine nurturing is nothing near what a woman’s nurturing is... in fact, it is exhibited and experienced in totally different parts of the brain and "felt" totally differently than each other.
 
What this means is that a man "feels" love differently and process feelings differently in different parts of their brains as women do... What this means is that you cannot assign behaviors to being masculine or feminine.... nurturing is not a man bring out his feminine side... it is a man bringing out his Masculine Nurturing side...
 
Only those who are closed minded and have to hold onto the lies of pop psychology will argue otherwise... as well as being uninformed in the true nature of psychology and neuroscience....
 
So before you flame me, I suggest that you forget the bookstore and do some serious research in a psychology Department library... neurology will also help a lot in understanding this.
 
And this does go into the brain functionality of Gay men and women sissy boys, dykes, transgender, and so forth.
 
It also goes into the stupid infamy of how the alternative people has totally distorted the actual meaning and philosophy of Yin and Yang… again distributed solely for the selling of books to the total destruction of the truth. I promise you that what you will find at the books in the bookstore is stories written specifically to sell books with little actual truth in them.
 

quote:

ORIGINAL: CruelandKindSdst

The whole concept of a person being a combination of male and female is a total fallicy perpetuated originally by a women that was pushing men to be more like women.. Her assumptions were extremely flawed and are even worse now.
 
Science has shown through neurological examination, MRI recorded experiments, as well as genetic studies recently completed that her ideas  were nothing but conjecture.
 
It is easy to see though, how this became popular... in the 60's when this originally got started by the liberal feminist it sold thousands of books... to women. The Masses wanted to believe that this was true... so through mass marketing, it sold books and caught on in the politically correct venues of pop psychology... the only minor problem was that there was not any substantiation to go along with it. (That means that the whole idea was plucked out of her ass because that is what she wanted men to be like.)
 
One regular and extremely wrong example used by women to justify this logical travesty in common sense is to point out if you cry or if you are sensitive or any other "Behavior" that is assigned to women is exhibited by men, then it is obvious that this is the female side of a man... visa versa. That my friend is not logic, it is emotional rationality... and a total lie!!
 
The whole aspect of male/female function was based upon behaviors... not science. It was assumed that femininity was equated to crying, softness, nurturing, grouping, being irrational and so forth... and that to be masculine was to be strong, cold, hard, aggressive, and so forth....   Again this whole line of rational thinking was totally flawed in the first place.
 
What has been discovered is that each gender has it's own version of how it feels, how it operates under different stimuli, etc... A masculine nurturing is nothing near what a woman’s nurturing is... in fact, it is exhibited and experienced in totally different parts of the brain and "felt" totally differently than each other.
 
What this means is that a man "feels" love differently and process feelings differently in different parts of their brains as women do... What this means is that you cannot assign behaviors to being masculine or feminine.... nurturing is not a man bring out his feminine side... it is a man bringing out his Masculine Nurturing side...
 
Only those who are closed minded and have to hold onto the lies of pop psychology will argue otherwise... as well as being uninformed in the true nature of psychology and neuroscience....
 
So before you flame me, I suggest that you forget the bookstore and do some serious research in a psychology Department library... neurology will also help a lot in understanding this.
 
And this does go into the brain functionality of Gay men and women sissy boys, dykes, transgender, and so forth.
 
It also goes into the stupid infamy of how the alternative people has totally distorted the actual meaning and philosophy of Yin and Yang… again distributed solely for the selling of books to the total destruction of the truth. I promise you that what you will find at the books in the bookstore is stories written specifically to sell books with little actual truth in them.
 

quote:

The whole concept of a person being a combination of male and female is a total fallicy perpetuated originally by a women that was pushing men to be more like women.. Her assumptions were extremely flawed and are even worse now.