|
Trismagistus -> RE: Anonymous strikes again (2/2/2012 8:14:40 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Yachtie
Having perused the email site a bit, what is it about RP that brings such as white supremacists as supporters? Could it be Paul's constitutional belief in the freedom of association? Taxation? Freedom of religion without government interference? Paul's stance on the 10th amendment? etc.
Lets juxtapose Paul's heinous supporters with those of Romney and Gingrich. Romney is well funded by the Banksters. Gingrich is a Washington insider par excellence; Fannie and Freddie Mac?. Both are beholden to corrupt entities. Are those supporters virtuous? Are they deserving of a supportive pass not allowed to Paul? Someone has to help Paul fund his campaign, so why not people who agree with him? Are they better or worse than those who own Romney and Gingrich? Is it about the message or the supporters of the messenger?
Now, just what is Liberty?
oh, dude I totally understand that, Ron Paul is the closest thing to a good candidate we've had in over a decade. But and it's a big but, almost a ghetto booty sized one, he's probably not going to get into office and is just going to instill false hope enough in us that things can get better that they'll have plenty of time to get worse til we go back to hating our government. And even if he did get into office he'd probably just get sniped by the CIA like Kennedy or something equally horrible, poor guy.
|
|
|
|
