Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Thoughts on Dog.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Thoughts on Dog. Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Thoughts on Dog. - 6/2/2006 3:52:50 AM   
darkinshadows


Posts: 4145
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: UK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pavel

So yeah.  Why in the spiritual sense, do bad things happen to good people?


Why is it God?  You are taking the sensationalist view that bad things happen to good people and God could change it.
 
He won't.  The choice was made.
Free will.
 
And why are all these things that occur, 'a bad thing'?  Why is it not up to us as humans, to care for our planet, to nurture it, to be responsible for each other without wanting anything back, other than to learn and gain more understanding?  It all boils down to the fact that people have grown to 'expect'.
We are owed nothing.
We should expect nothing.
We should simply love.
 
quote:

(As an aside for you non-religious people, or folks with beliefs in conflict, please, please please be polite.  The world has enough people burned at the stake/beheaded/thrown to the lions, etc, etc because we can't tolerate other people's faith.  Let's at least pretend to be civil.

I actually find that a rather ironic statement/request from someone whos first word could be viewed as a derogatory term.
(Yes, I know it was a punchline, I am just suggesting that conflict will occur - it is human nature - why should people 'pretend' to be anything they are not?)
Just an observation.
 
Peace and Rapture


_____________________________


.dark.




...i surrender to gravity and the unknown...

(in reply to Pavel)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Thoughts on Dog. - 6/2/2006 4:01:46 AM   
darkinshadows


Posts: 4145
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: UK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tikkiee

I have studied physics, I have studied mathematics, I have studied astrology, I have studied theology.
I lay all my cards at the table of proven science. Yes, I am an atheist. I do not believe that there is a higher power guiding all of us. I don't believe in the devil, I don't believe in angels, I don't believe in 'one all powerful god'. My experience in my short life span has shown me that both god and the devil are used to place blame when things go wrong.
My life is what I make it. I don't attribute my luck to god, and I don't blame the devil when something goes wrong. I place all responsibility at my own feet.
I got where I am today because of ME; and if I fall flat on my face tomorrow, the blame lies with ME also.


I believe in a God, and in an opposite entity, I know there are angels.
 
Other than that - ditto on what you just said - yet I am a christian.
Blaming the devil or some evil force is a cop out.  Personal responsibility.  It is actually a myth that christians actually believes in blaming the devil for mistakes they made.
 
Peace and Love


_____________________________


.dark.




...i surrender to gravity and the unknown...

(in reply to Tikkiee)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Thoughts on Dog. - 6/2/2006 4:10:52 AM   
Tikkiee


Posts: 1099
Joined: 4/6/2006
Status: offline
I acknowledge and commend you for your beliefs.
 
As I said, I lay my cards at the table of science. One day, IF it is ever shown to me, beyond a doubt, that there is scientific evidence that a higher entity exists, my stance will probably be re-evaluated. Until that day arrives, I believe in what I can see, touch, hear, and taste.

_____________________________

~~@ cass @~~

(in reply to darkinshadows)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Thoughts on Dog. - 6/2/2006 4:14:18 AM   
darkinshadows


Posts: 4145
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: UK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tikkiee

 Until that day arrives, I believe in what I can see, touch, hear, and taste.

So do I.
 
Peace and Rapture


_____________________________


.dark.




...i surrender to gravity and the unknown...

(in reply to Tikkiee)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Thoughts on Dog. - 6/2/2006 4:17:33 AM   
IronBear


Posts: 9008
Joined: 6/19/2005
From: Beenleigh, Qld, Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pavel

Back when I was a much more pious/self righteous/confused person, my youth pastor told me a joke about "What's the dyslexic atheist looking for?" with the punch line being "dog."  Hence the title of this post.  That and really, who would willingly check a post called "thoughts on God?"

Carrying on in good order however.  I've noticed a fair pile of posts relating to religion and the like on this board in the last few days, and I'm going to jump on the bandwagon.  I'm not exactly a theology student, and I got twitchy in Phil. 101, but I've always been curious as to how people in different faiths and belief systems reconcile when bad stuff happens to good people.
This particular topic was spurred by an article (by the AP) that ran in the Seattle Times tonight that focused on the reactions of people in Indonesia to recent natural disasters and the like.  The reoccurring theme seemed to follow that A. Allah was upset at <insert perceive national failing> and was punishing people (of course, this logic always confused me.  If God/Goddess/Allah/Batman really was pissed off, wouldn't he/she be better off frying the heathens, than his/her possibly slightly lost followers?) or B. Allah was testing the faithful (while this logic is borne out in the Bible, in the story of Job in particular, why would a diety that knows your heart, soul, mind, shoe size really, really need to make your life suck to know that you loved/had faith/didn't eat meat on the wrong day.)


So yeah.  Why in the spiritual sense, do bad things happen to good people?

(As an aside for you non-religious people, or folks with beliefs in conflict, please, please please be polite.  The world has enough people burned at the stake/beheaded/thrown to the lions, etc, etc because we can't tolerate other people's faith.  Let's at least pretend to be civil.



Crikey and here was me thinking the thread was all about "Dog The Bounty Hunter"...... Ahh well back to the glass of port..


_____________________________

Iron Bear

Master of Bruin Cottage

http://www.bruincottage.org

Your attitude, words & actions are yours. Take responsibility for them and the consequences they incur.

D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F.

(in reply to Pavel)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Thoughts on Dog. - 6/2/2006 4:30:28 AM   
darkinshadows


Posts: 4145
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: UK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: IronBear

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pavel

Back when I was a much more pious/self righteous/confused person, my youth pastor told me a joke about "What's the dyslexic atheist looking for?" with the punch line being "dog."  Hence the title of this post.  That and really, who would willingly check a post called "thoughts on God?"

Carrying on in good order however.  I've noticed a fair pile of posts relating to religion and the like on this board in the last few days, and I'm going to jump on the bandwagon.  I'm not exactly a theology student, and I got twitchy in Phil. 101, but I've always been curious as to how people in different faiths and belief systems reconcile when bad stuff happens to good people.
This particular topic was spurred by an article (by the AP) that ran in the Seattle Times tonight that focused on the reactions of people in Indonesia to recent natural disasters and the like.  The reoccurring theme seemed to follow that A. Allah was upset at <insert perceive national failing> and was punishing people (of course, this logic always confused me.  If God/Goddess/Allah/Batman really was pissed off, wouldn't he/she be better off frying the heathens, than his/her possibly slightly lost followers?) or B. Allah was testing the faithful (while this logic is borne out in the Bible, in the story of Job in particular, why would a diety that knows your heart, soul, mind, shoe size really, really need to make your life suck to know that you loved/had faith/didn't eat meat on the wrong day.)


So yeah.  Why in the spiritual sense, do bad things happen to good people?

(As an aside for you non-religious people, or folks with beliefs in conflict, please, please please be polite.  The world has enough people burned at the stake/beheaded/thrown to the lions, etc, etc because we can't tolerate other people's faith.  Let's at least pretend to be civil.



Crikey and here was me thinking the thread was all about "Dog The Bounty Hunter"...... Ahh well back to the glass of port..


OMGosh... so did I!
(is so glad it wasn't just me)
 
Peace and Rature


_____________________________


.dark.




...i surrender to gravity and the unknown...

(in reply to IronBear)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Thoughts on Dog. - 6/2/2006 6:13:48 AM   
ArtCatDom


Posts: 478
Joined: 1/20/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MistressLorelei

The reason I don't belong to a Christian-based faith is because I don't want to and cannot believe in a god or a dog who intentionally allows harm to come to innocent people, because all things happen for a reason, or to teach us a lesson, etc.  I don't understand how god could justify or approve of the heinous murder of an innocent person.  Furthermore, the murdered person who could be a caring, loving person who never harmed anyone, yet could still be hellbound, and the murderer could be forgiven and sent to heaven when his time comes.  Yes, it's my opinion... but I don't want to believe anything like that.  Others should believe whatever they choose to believe.

I do believe that if you are a good person, goodness will follow you, and vice-versa. However, we often cannot control what  harm others, nature, or accidents/outside forces do to us.  I believe everyone is responsible for their actions, and what is beyond our own control, is ultimately beyond anyone's/anything's control

Reply was to no one in particular, just the fast reply thing to address the OP.


Your explanation that we cannot control the free will of others is exactly the same defense Christian theologists use.

Just a thought.

*meow*

(in reply to MistressLorelei)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Thoughts on Dog. - 6/2/2006 6:19:02 AM   
ArtCatDom


Posts: 478
Joined: 1/20/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: blacknblueballs

MistressLorelei's and ArtCatDom's comments both got me to thinking.

The primary reason why i do not subscribe to the Christian-based faith has to do with free will.  God says something along the lines of "worship me, of your own free will.  the temptation to do 'bad' is there, but you should rise above and worship me."  This sounds all nice and good.  However, this god is holding a proverbial gun to my head when this is asked of me.  It is difficult to claim i am offering god my free-willing worship when the alternative - should i decide with my free will to not worship god - is damnation.  God is kind of like a school yard bully:  "You want to give me your lunch money, right?  Willingly, right?  Cuz if you don't, I'm gonna pound the snot out of you."


Just so you understand my own point of view, I am an universalist. I believe everyone, no matter how wicked, receives salvation in the end. So, in my faith, there is no gun-point diplomacy.

What constitutes "Hell" is a matter of great conjecture to me. It could be that we are reincarnated until we "learn our lesson". It could be akin to a furnace that burns off the dross. Et cetera.

*meow*

(in reply to blacknblueballs)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Thoughts on Dog. - 6/2/2006 6:30:11 AM   
ArtCatDom


Posts: 478
Joined: 1/20/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tikkiee

I acknowledge and commend you for your beliefs.
 
As I said, I lay my cards at the table of science. One day, IF it is ever shown to me, beyond a doubt, that there is scientific evidence that a higher entity exists, my stance will probably be re-evaluated. Until that day arrives, I believe in what I can see, touch, hear, and taste.


Hmm, just some thoughts.

Nothing can be shown beyond all doubt, especially in science.

Much of science is predicated on observations and theories that you cannot perceive with the senses listed.

Again, just some thoughts.

*meow*

(in reply to Tikkiee)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Thoughts on Dog. - 6/2/2006 6:34:23 AM   
Moloch


Posts: 1090
Joined: 6/25/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: IronBear
Crikey and here was me thinking the thread was all about "Dog The Bounty Hunter"...... Ahh well back to the glass of port..


If you watch that show   You  either  A) Get Brain cancer   or B) Move to a trailer, start doing crystal meth and humping your family tree.
Reaaaaly Bad show

(in reply to IronBear)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Thoughts on Dog. - 6/2/2006 6:54:57 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ArtCatDom



Hmm, just some thoughts.

Nothing can be shown beyond all doubt, especially in science.

Much of science is predicated on observations and theories that you cannot perceive with the senses listed.

Again, just some thoughts.

*meow*


I don't think science as ever claimed to prove things beyond doubt but enough to convince us at least temporarily that natural laws react in certain ways, at least enough for many of us to fly in an aeroplane and the like.

Now if a prophet told you to flap your arms and jump off a tall building, I wouldn't recommend it.

< Message edited by meatcleaver -- 6/2/2006 6:56:30 AM >

(in reply to ArtCatDom)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Thoughts on Dog. - 6/2/2006 7:06:04 AM   
ArtCatDom


Posts: 478
Joined: 1/20/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

quote:

ORIGINAL: ArtCatDom



Hmm, just some thoughts.

Nothing can be shown beyond all doubt, especially in science.

Much of science is predicated on observations and theories that you cannot perceive with the senses listed.

Again, just some thoughts.

*meow*


I don't think science as ever claimed to prove things beyond doubt but enough to convince us at least temporarily that natural laws react in certain ways, at least enough for many of us to fly in an aeroplane and the like.

Now if a prophet told you to flap your arms and jump off a tall building, I wouldn't recommend it.


*sighs* Read what I was responding to. Also note the cavaet "just some thoughts".

*meow*

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Thoughts on Dog. - 6/2/2006 7:06:50 AM   
Tikkiee


Posts: 1099
Joined: 4/6/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ArtCatDom


quote:

ORIGINAL: Tikkiee

I acknowledge and commend you for your beliefs.
 
As I said, I lay my cards at the table of science. One day, IF it is ever shown to me, beyond a doubt, that there is scientific evidence that a higher entity exists, my stance will probably be re-evaluated. Until that day arrives, I believe in what I can see, touch, hear, and taste.


Hmm, just some thoughts.

Nothing can be shown beyond all doubt, especially in science.

Much of science is predicated on observations and theories that you cannot perceive with the senses listed.

Again, just some thoughts.

*meow*

On the contrary, the senses are extremely scientifically based and proven, beyond a doubt.
And yes, while science is based on observations and theories; it is also backed by research and factual data.

_____________________________

~~@ cass @~~

(in reply to ArtCatDom)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Thoughts on Dog. - 6/2/2006 7:10:13 AM   
MstrTiger


Posts: 417
Joined: 1/14/2006
From: UK
Status: offline

I think the universe happened because it had to happen for us to be able to get to the point we are in, everything that has happened in the past did so because it was inevitable what is the future is built on the foundations of what has happened in the past it is just a continuing process of inevitability.

I don’t think people truly have free will since all our actions are based on what has happened before we arrive at the point in time where we have to make them. I think people can only have true free will in a vacuum with nothing in the past and where our actions will not influence the future.

“Nothing can be shown beyond all doubt, especially in science.” that is not a argument against following a scientific approach all you are saying is that nothing can be proven to truly exist and that includes god also. I think religion has more trouble proving issues beyond doubt than science does.

(in reply to Moloch)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Thoughts on Dog. - 6/2/2006 7:18:57 AM   
ArtCatDom


Posts: 478
Joined: 1/20/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tikkiee

quote:

ORIGINAL: ArtCatDom


quote:

ORIGINAL: Tikkiee

I acknowledge and commend you for your beliefs.
 
As I said, I lay my cards at the table of science. One day, IF it is ever shown to me, beyond a doubt, that there is scientific evidence that a higher entity exists, my stance will probably be re-evaluated. Until that day arrives, I believe in what I can see, touch, hear, and taste.


Hmm, just some thoughts.

Nothing can be shown beyond all doubt, especially in science.

Much of science is predicated on observations and theories that you cannot perceive with the senses listed.

Again, just some thoughts.

*meow*

On the contrary, the senses are extremely scientifically based and proven, beyond a doubt.
And yes, while science is based on observations and theories; it is also backed by research and factual data.


Now that statement, I do not disagree with. I was simply responding to your post asking for proof beyond doubt (which even science does not provide) and your statement that you rely on your simple senses (while science depends on things we cannot perceive with them).

*meow*

(in reply to Tikkiee)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Thoughts on Dog. - 6/2/2006 7:39:11 AM   
NastyDaddy


Posts: 957
Joined: 9/8/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Tikkiee

quote:

ORIGINAL: ArtCatDom


quote:

ORIGINAL: Tikkiee

I acknowledge and commend you for your beliefs.
 
As I said, I lay my cards at the table of science. One day, IF it is ever shown to me, beyond a doubt, that there is scientific evidence that a higher entity exists, my stance will probably be re-evaluated. Until that day arrives, I believe in what I can see, touch, hear, and taste.


Hmm, just some thoughts.

Nothing can be shown beyond all doubt, especially in science.

Much of science is predicated on observations and theories that you cannot perceive with the senses listed.

Again, just some thoughts.

*meow*

On the contrary, the senses are extremely scientifically based and proven, beyond a doubt.
And yes, while science is based on observations and theories; it is also backed by research and factual data.


She said  IF it is ever shown to me, beyond a doubt...
He said Nothing can be shown beyond all doubt...

Beyond 'a doubt' infers a doubt could be 1 out of 100,000,000,000,000,000,000... (add zeros all day...)
Beyond 'all doubt' infers 100 percent, or very close to that affect.

This leaves quite a broad spectrum of doubt between the two criterion, so I tend to doubt that you are both speaking the same meaning of your undoubtedly spoken/stated criteria.

Personally I don't like the term 'atheist', it rings too much like 'infidel', a term used by islamic undoubters towards doubters of their fine one size fits all religion... atheist is simply a parallel term for a parallel group of often extremely overbearing and zealous undoubters who will judge you as atheist if you do not agree with their heartfelt undoubts. They tend to be a bit more passive and don't blow themselves up in crowded public places, they primarily use 'guilt trip' methodology... "I know where I'm going when I die..."

No doubt many will doubt what I'm saying but I doubt if their doubts will impact undoubters or their opposition doubters.

Which came first the ameba or the higher evolved human thinking machine organ?  Do ameba's go to heaven, or get to meet allah and get a wheelbarrow full of ameba gold and 12 browneyed virgin ameba's.... I seriously doubt it.

It is interesting so many adhere to a philosophy we are all just inhabitants of test tubes... little tests and projects to test our faith in the creator.... that wonderful entity who gave us the beautiful test tube or petre dish to live in until they pull the cord on our part of their experiments.... undoubtedly a very strange concept, regardless of the label applied, or particular flavor of undoubter zeal.

(in reply to Tikkiee)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Thoughts on Dog. - 6/2/2006 9:59:35 AM   
Tikkiee


Posts: 1099
Joined: 4/6/2006
Status: offline
quote:

atheist is simply a parallel term for a parallel group of often extremely overbearing and zealous undoubters who will judge you as atheist if you do not agree with their heartfelt undoubts.

I have to disagree with you. I do not judge any person by their own beliefs. In fact, I embrace others ideals, even when they conflict with mine. I see all sides of the coin; I choose to stand on my side, and others choose to stand on theirs. But that does not mean that I do not see, and comprehend,  all sides.
 
From the sounds of it though, you are having quite the time trying to see past your own superiority. Shame, your arguments could have been constructive; instead they come across as sounding as nothing more than the ramblings of a fanatic.

_____________________________

~~@ cass @~~

(in reply to NastyDaddy)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Thoughts on Dog. - 6/2/2006 10:58:30 AM   
ArtCatDom


Posts: 478
Joined: 1/20/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tikkiee

quote:

atheist is simply a parallel term for a parallel group of often extremely overbearing and zealous undoubters who will judge you as atheist if you do not agree with their heartfelt undoubts.

I have to disagree with you. I do not judge any person by their own beliefs. In fact, I embrace others ideals, even when they conflict with mine. I see all sides of the coin; I choose to stand on my side, and others choose to stand on theirs. But that does not mean that I do not see, and comprehend,  all sides.
 
From the sounds of it though, you are having quite the time trying to see past your own superiority. Shame, your arguments could have been constructive; instead they come across as sounding as nothing more than the ramblings of a fanatic.


In their defense, they may have painted with a broad brush but that assertion is generally true. Secular humanists (the most vocal and famous of atheists) are generally just as evangelical and irrational as any religious fundementalists.

*meow*

(in reply to Tikkiee)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Thoughts on Dog. - 6/2/2006 11:34:02 AM   
Tikkiee


Posts: 1099
Joined: 4/6/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Secular humanists (the most vocal and famous of atheists) are generally just as evangelical and irrational as any religious fundementalists.

Very true. I will not argue that point.

_____________________________

~~@ cass @~~

(in reply to ArtCatDom)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Thoughts on Dog. - 6/2/2006 11:50:58 AM   
carlsteel


Posts: 8
Joined: 5/13/2005
From: North West Arizona
Status: offline
It's a pleasure to contribute to this thread. It's especially gratifying because I'm always right. Now if I were only modest.

1. Don't shy from the word atheist. It is the correct academic term for someone does not believe in god.

2. I have, since I was a child been a member of the Unitarian Universalist churches. Plenty of atheists there, even a few of the ministers are.  There is no dogma, that is to say offical doctrine. Hence the old saying no two Unitarians believe the same thing. Each individual has to make their own religious choices and decisions. Great if you have a critical, thinking mind. Lousy if you need to be told what to believe. i.e., what is truth. I belong to the religious humanist wing of the church. In the simplest words my religion is a tool kit for discovering the truth in life, about justice, the universe, morality, economics, public policy, and ethics. Or as it was once described back in the 1960's, the use of reason and the scientific method in religion. In short, I am a religious atheist. There is no  room for superstition, bigotry or anti-intellectualism in my life.


_____________________________

The Gentleman Sadist

(in reply to Tikkiee)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Thoughts on Dog. Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094