Damacis -> RE: Any female subs in chastity belts? (3/1/2012 10:22:34 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: kitkat105 quote:
ORIGINAL: hangemhigh1953 quote:
ORIGINAL: littlewonder no chastity belt here. Instead if he tells me no playing, no orgasms or whatever I just listen to him. No chastity belt needed. Well he could always tell you to sit perfectly still, and you'd do it, but that's not exactly the same as bondage is it? Chastity belts are a form of bondage, IMO. That said, I can see how female devices would be severely impractical and not very hygienic. So you've never heard of obedience? If your Sir or Master says no orgasms, that means NO ORGASM! May not enjoy it, but its simple. You are missing the point. It does become a bit tiresome for people to continually come into chastity threads and say "look at me, I don't need chastity." (Not saying that's you.) For many people that isn't the point. There are plenty of people who can choose not to masturbate as a form of obedience, however for them chastity adds another layer of control in and of itself and adds another layer of arousal and submission. As hangemhigh put it, you could be obedient and not move when Master says don't move, but guess what, bondage adds another layer of control and is in and of itself a source of arousal for both parties.
|
|
|
|