tazzygirl
Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
Many people have been saying for years it would come to this. I, for one, didn't believe them. This is so beyond the pale, it is sickening. We're sliding down a slippery slope and better realize it before the government ends up having the final say on who is "viable" and who is not. Yes they have. I recall these kinds of comments when we started with advanced directives. And its as much bullshit then as it is now. Their conclusions... are quite humorous. .. and filled with flaws. The problem is that at the moment of birth, all infants are then protected the same as any adult, legally. In order for the government to "sanction" killing defective infants it would have to reverse its stance on euthanasia. Bioethics is a field that is full of unusual questions... and some people like to ask the most outrageous simply for their 15 minutes of fame. In rebuttal, this was interesting.... Any society that will not protect its children and kill threats to those children is pointless, and exercise in futility, and eventually doomed to failure and dissolution. Hence, there is no quandary about whether or not Giubilini and Minerva need, from an ethical standpoint, to be hunted down and exterminate. It’s self-evident. http://blog.jonolan.net/ethics-morality/an-ethical-quandary/
_____________________________
Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt. RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11 Duchess of Dissent 1 Dont judge me because I sin differently than you. If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.
|