RE: Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims

RE: Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Yachtie -> RE: Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/6/2012 7:18:59 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 Look buddy....you`re knew here.....so I understand.... [blah blah blah] I apologize for not properly groveling before one of the savviest board members on CM. I, as a libertarian, should learn my place. Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa. [8\|][8\|][8\|] [sm=popcorn.gif]

fucktoyprincess -> RE: In response to Pat Robertson's comments, Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/6/2012 7:20:12 AM)
FR Yes, it happens every time. When an emergency arises the conservatives and religious right who do not support the redistribution of income and believe in people taking responsibility for themselves are then standing in line to receive federal and state assistance. Again, I support the redistribution of wealth. But for those of you who do NOT support the concept of redistribution of wealth, and vote at every turn to deny OTHERS government assistance, please explain to me WHY exactly YOU are entitled to assistance now. Why is YOUR need any greater than that of anyone else? Why is it when people attack liberals it is about unnecessary "handouts" that conservative don't feel like paying for, but when it is conservatives who are hurt, they require necessary "assistance" and I am expected to pay. I'm happy to pay my taxes to help others. BUT it really bugs me when my tax dollars go to people who actually fight the concept of redistribution at every turn. Happy to get a handout when THEY are the ones in trouble. It's just those OTHER people who shouldn't get handouts. Ah yes, hypocrisy, gotta love it.

tazzygirl -> RE: Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/6/2012 7:20:19 AM)
Its good that you are learning these things now.

Lucylastic -> RE: Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/6/2012 7:25:34 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Yachtie quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 Look buddy....you`re knew here.....so I understand.... [blah blah blah] I apologize for not properly groveling before one of the savviest board members on CM. I, as a libertarian, should learn my place. Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa. [8\|][8\|][8\|] [sm=popcorn.gif] Grovelling is not required, Unlike some, I dont need to flaunt my orientation like a badge of arrogance Edited to correct a smelling mistrake Thanks Ron:)

Owner59 -> RE: Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/6/2012 7:25:59 AM)
Definitely edited. He doesn`t bash the victims tho......but rather he`s bashing fundies. This is how rightist media works and how righties get duped. Why don`t they just cut the pretense put quotes on it next to President Obama`s name[:D]

Owner59 -> RE: Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/6/2012 7:28:04 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: Yachtie quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 Look buddy....you`re knew here.....so I understand.... [blah blah blah] I apologize for not properly groveling before one of the savviest board members on CM. I, as a libertarian, should learn my place. Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa. [8\|][8\|][8\|] [sm=popcorn.gif] Grovelling is not required, Unlike some, I dont need to flaunt my orientation like a badge of arrgogance Oh........a libertarian........my apologies..........[:D]

Owner59 -> RE: Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/6/2012 7:29:58 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Its good that you are learning these things now. And don`t be ask`n this savvy board member for quotes or links........ unless you`re prepared to debate.[;)]

Musicmystery -> RE: Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/6/2012 7:32:27 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Yachtie quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Ron Paul says they should fend for themselves..and not get any fed money!!! yay[8\|] It's evident you disagree with Paul. But I wonder if you actually understand why he holds such position? Do you? Nothing by way of a case here, just a dismissal. So what are those reasons? Then we'd have something to discuss.

mnottertail -> RE: Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/6/2012 7:32:39 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Grovelling is not required, Unlike some, I dont need to flaunt my orientation like a badge of arrgogance While I could claim to be agog at your post, if you would have spelt it arrogance, it would have been much more powerful, in my mind..... LOL, can't help it, it is how I am built, Luce.

Lucylastic -> RE: Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/6/2012 7:33:11 AM)
You Utter Utter Bastage!!! smooch

mnottertail -> RE: Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/6/2012 7:34:29 AM)
C'est le guerre, Mon Cheri. DeGaulle

Yachtie -> RE: In response to Pat Robertson's comments, Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/6/2012 7:44:48 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess FR Yes, it happens every time. When an emergency arises the conservatives and religious right who do not support the redistribution of income and believe in people taking responsibility for themselves are then standing in line to receive federal and state assistance. Again, I support the redistribution of wealth. But for those of you who do NOT support the concept of redistribution of wealth, and vote at every turn to deny OTHERS government assistance, please explain to me WHY exactly YOU are entitled to assistance now. Why is YOUR need any greater than that of anyone else? Why is it when people attack liberals it is about unnecessary "handouts" that conservative don't feel like paying for, but when it is conservatives who are hurt, they require necessary "assistance" and I am expected to pay. I'm happy to pay my taxes to help others. BUT it really bugs me when my tax dollars go to people who actually fight the concept of redistribution at every turn. Happy to get a handout when THEY are the ones in trouble. It's just those OTHER people who shouldn't get handouts. Ah yes, hypocrisy, gotta love it. That's easy. They paid for it! Government redistribution of wealth is nothing more than government sponsored insurance, force paid by the people, and doled out by government to whom it decides should receive it. BUT it really bugs me when my tax dollars* go to people who actually fight the concept of redistribution at every turn.* Well it should. On the other hand, should those whom are forced to support what they vehemently disagree with (government redistribution) be denied their claim for coverage (asking for the handout) which they have every right to make because they paid for it? There is no hypocrisy there.

kalikshama -> RE: In response to Pat Robertson's comments, Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/6/2012 7:58:45 AM)
quote: Happy to get a handout when THEY are the ones in trouble. It's just those OTHER people who shouldn't get handouts. A great example of this is Megyn Kelly's stance on maternity leave - she was against it (2008-2010) until she needed it (2011). http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-august-11-2011/lactate-intolerance "Here's the thing about entitlements," Stewart said afterwards. "They're really only entitlements when they're something other people want. When it's something you want, they're a hallmark of a civilized society, the foundation of a great people. I just had a baby and found out maternity leave strengthens society. But since I still have a job, unemployment benefits are clearly socialism." His only conclusion was that Kelly is suffering from "post-partum compassion." And now she's against contraceptive coverage [8\|] http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-march-5-2012/extremely-loud---incredibly-gross He concluded the extended segment with a final swipe at Megyn Kelly for being against insurance coverage for contraceptives when her defense of maternity was so fierce in recent times.

Owner59 -> RE: In response to Pat Robertson's comments, Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/6/2012 8:05:27 AM)
Libertarian........a republican who can`t bring himself to vote for republicans(pick a reason)but has found another way to waste their vote......[:D]

Lucylastic -> RE: In response to Pat Robertson's comments, Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/6/2012 8:07:01 AM)
"Personally, I don't get too worked up about the things Rush Limbaugh says because he is -- and has been for many years -- a terrible person." he is way to kind.

DomKen -> RE: In response to Pat Robertson's comments, Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/6/2012 8:08:54 AM)
Before this thread I'd never heard of Mike Malloy. How is some minor radio talker comparable to the leader of the conservative movement before which all GOP pols must grovel?

Lucylastic -> RE: In response to Pat Robertson's comments, Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/6/2012 8:09:38 AM)
Consider the source Ken

Yachtie -> RE: In response to Pat Robertson's comments, Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/6/2012 8:10:20 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kalikshama A great example of this is Megyn Kelly's stance on maternity leave - she was against it (2008-2010) until she needed it (2011). Stewart skewered her[8D] She deserved it[:D]

Moonhead -> RE: In response to Pat Robertson's comments, Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/6/2012 8:11:56 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen Before this thread I'd never heard of Mike Malloy. How is some minor radio talker comparable to the leader of the conservative movement before which all GOP pols must grovel? He isn't. However pointing this out doesn't seem to achieve anything.

Moonhead -> RE: In response to Pat Robertson's comments, Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/6/2012 8:13:48 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Yachtie Well it should. On the other hand, should those whom are forced to support what they vehemently disagree with (government redistribution) be denied their claim for coverage (asking for the handout) which they have every right to make because they paid for it? There is no hypocrisy there. You don't feel that their trying to claim something for themself that they're opposed to everybody else receiving is hypocrisy? WTF is it, then?

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875