RE: In response to Pat Robertson's comments, Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message

thompsonx -> RE: In response to Pat Robertson's comments, Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/7/2012 10:20:01 AM)

quote:

No! Take your failed utopian socialist/communist progressive ideology and get the hell out of my country


Which "failed utopian socialist/communist progressive ideology "are you refering to?



fucktoyprincess -> RE: In response to Pat Robertson's comments, Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/7/2012 10:21:58 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

No! Take your failed utopian socialist/communist progressive ideology and get the hell out of my country


Which "failed utopian socialist/communist progressive ideology "are you refering to?


Oh thompsonx, were you not aware that having a system of taxation constitutes socialist/communist progressive ideology in some people's minds? Sighs. [&:]



thompsonx -> RE: In response to Pat Robertson's comments, Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/7/2012 10:32:16 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967

Wrong, we don't want the safety net,


How presumptious of you to speak for 300+ million people

we want people to take responsibility for their own well being,

So that would mean that you are against corporations because the corp. shields the owners from personal responsibility.

and not rely on the government programs.

You being a cop then should instantly quit your job if you have any ethical fiber.







Yachtie -> RE: In response to Pat Robertson's comments, Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/7/2012 10:32:17 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn


Hiya again, Yatchie.

I am very well disenamored of the terms 'spread the wealth' or 're-distribute' also. But my premise is that if we were to refrain from maldistribution of the wealth in the first place, there would be no need for 're-distribution.' 



That alone speaks volumes. Generally I concur. I'd add that if people in power did not abuse that power (or their Office) and actually did what they were supposed to do we'd not as a people be having these discussions.

My motto is; if we don't like having so many poor people, then quit enacting laws that create so many of them.

I agree. See my tag line.







thompsonx -> RE: Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/7/2012 10:33:48 AM)

quote:

It's no wonder progressive talk radio is such an utter failure.



So you have never heard of npr?
Perhaps you might google it and disabuse yourself of your self imposed ignorance.



thompsonx -> RE: In response to Pat Robertson's comments, Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/7/2012 10:35:16 AM)

quote:

My motto is; if we don't like having so many poor people, then quit enacting laws that create so many of them.


Perhaps you would be so kind as to tell us which laws create so many poor people?



thompsonx -> RE: In response to Pat Robertson's comments, Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/7/2012 10:36:34 AM)

quote:

No reason to go further. You could not comprehend even that much.


Oh my, what a convenient way to avoid defending your position.



DaNewAgeViking -> RE: In response to Pat Robertson's comments, Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/7/2012 10:37:40 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie

No! Take your failed utopian socialist/communist progressive ideology and get the hell out of my country


Your country? Like Hell! It belongs to all of us, and since most of us want this nation to recover from its hurts and be great again, the minority who don't give a damn for anything but their own sick, twisted ideology are outvoted.
[sm=fingers.gif]



thompsonx -> RE: Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/7/2012 10:37:48 AM)

quote:

Ms. Rand is not the be all end all of libertarianism.

Thank you for playing.

Next.


Really? Who pray tell is?



Yachtie -> RE: In response to Pat Robertson's comments, Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/7/2012 10:38:32 AM)

fr

The contortions being exhibited in this thread by the leftist progressives is absolutely common. Most entertaining [sm=popcorn.gif]






Moonhead -> RE: In response to Pat Robertson's comments, Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/7/2012 10:39:48 AM)

Then do better instead of spouting snark and evasion.



Yachtie -> RE: In response to Pat Robertson's comments, Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/7/2012 10:45:21 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaNewAgeViking


quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie

No! Take your failed utopian socialist/communist progressive ideology and get the hell out of my country


Your country? Like Hell! It belongs to all of us, and since most of us want this nation to recover from its hurts and be great again, the minority who don't give a damn for anything but their own sick, twisted ideology are outvoted.
[sm=fingers.gif]



The brainwashed people to whom this man being interviewed are the commie progressive leftists. You've been duped. And you think yourselves intelligent. You're not.



Yachtie -> RE: In response to Pat Robertson's comments, Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/7/2012 10:46:50 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Then do better instead of spouting snark and evasion.



Why throw pearls before swine?



Yachtie -> RE: In response to Pat Robertson's comments, Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/7/2012 10:52:58 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

No! Take your failed utopian socialist/communist progressive ideology and get the hell out of my country


Which "failed utopian socialist/communist progressive ideology "are you refering to?


The one that is currently crashing about your poor little head.



Moonhead -> RE: In response to Pat Robertson's comments, Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/7/2012 10:53:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Then do better instead of spouting snark and evasion.



Why throw pearls before swine?

If you don't think it's worth the effort, what are you doing in this forum in the first place?



Lucylastic -> RE: In response to Pat Robertson's comments, Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/7/2012 10:56:17 AM)

hahahahahhahahhahhahahhahahhahah
Talk about stomping ones foot
I cant take it seriously any of it. Commie , swine, STFU, ?
but the leftists are the problem?



Yachtie -> RE: In response to Pat Robertson's comments, Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/7/2012 11:00:12 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Then do better instead of spouting snark and evasion.



Why throw pearls before swine?

If you don't think it's worth the effort, what are you doing in this forum in the first place?


Enjoying the entertainment [sm=popcorn.gif] silly.



fucktoyprincess -> RE: In response to Pat Robertson's comments, Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/7/2012 11:05:41 AM)

So Yachtie, look at what a little investigation has brought up. (I'm assuming given your handle and your photo that you either own yachts or are into sailing generally) or in a business that relates to them. Are you telling me you (or some of your yachting buddies) have not been taking advantage of this little subsidy (either as a yacht owner or a businessman)? So payments to the poor are out. But subsidies that line your pocket are just fine. And you still want to post on this thread and claim "I don't believe in redistribution at all" (your words, not mine).

Oh I know already what you are going to say. Oh, no one I know benefits from this. Yeah, right.

http://quigley.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=480%3Aquigley-walz-peters-introduce-bill-to-end-subsidies-for-luxury-yachts&catid=19%3A2011-press-releases&Itemid=24

[sm=rofl.gif]




Yachtie -> RE: In response to Pat Robertson's comments, Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/7/2012 11:14:35 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess

So Yachtie, look at what a little investigation has brought up. (I'm assuming given your handle and your photo that you either own yachts or are into sailing generally) or in a business that relates to them. Are you telling me you (or some of your yachting buddies) have not been taking advantage of this little subsidy (either as a yacht owner or a businessman)? So payments to the poor are out. But subsidies that line your pocket are just fine. And you still want to post on this thread and claim "I don't believe in redistribution at all" (your words, not mine).

Oh I know already what you are going to say. Oh, no one I know benefits from this. Yeah, right.

http://quigley.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=480%3Aquigley-walz-peters-introduce-bill-to-end-subsidies-for-luxury-yachts&catid=19%3A2011-press-releases&Itemid=24







You goofball !!!!! ROFLMFAO... My boat is my home. My only home. You'd know that if you had read my profile.

Your "got ya" backfired sweetie.

[sm=popcorn.gif]

The laugh [sm=rofl.gif] is on you.






fucktoyprincess -> RE: In response to Pat Robertson's comments, Liberal Talk Show Host Mocks Tornado Victims (3/7/2012 11:39:21 AM)

Yachtie, it's still a subsidy. And you are still taking advantage of it. The fact that you would answer this as if you are not taking advantage of it is hilarious. So yes, you are taking a mortgage deduction for your yacht. This is a SUBSIDY.

For all your talk of not believing in redistribution, and feeling that people should be responsible for themselves, you have no problem taking handouts, do you?

Okay, this is going nowhere because you really don't know what hypocrisy means, do you? You really don't.

Also, Yachtie, throughout this entire discussion, I have stuck to trying to discuss the issues at hand. You, meanwhile, have resorted to calling me names, swearing at me, and otherwise throwing a kind of temper tantrum. Are you unable to engage in debate without resorting to ad hominem attack? Do you really think that calling me "goofball" makes you look like a rocket scientist? Or that telling me to "shut the fuck up" supports a proper exchange of ideas?

If you can't defend your position without resorting to ad hominem attack, maybe you shouldn't be on the boards. Because for some reason the things I (and others) have said have bothered you so very deeply, that you can't even engage in a civil discussion anymore.

What are you so angry about?



Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625